Davyd Chychkan, a Ukrainian artist known for his anarchist political views and socially engaged artwork, died 9 August from wounds sustained while repelling a Russian infantry assault in southern Zaporizhzhia Oblast. He was 39 years old.

Why was an anarchist artist on the front lines? Chychkan had his reasons.

When Russia launched its full-scale invasion, European cultural institutions offered him thousands of euros monthly to relocate and continue his work abroad. He refused. Making money off Ukraine’s war while safely abroad struck him as morally bankrupt, according to military colleague Mykyta Kozachynskyy.

Instead, Chychkan volunteered for a mortar crew.

The decision fit his philosophy.

“True anarchists must share the most difficult hardships that their people experience,” the Resistance Committee—an organization of anarchist fighters—quoted him saying. 

The group confirmed his death after he suffered severe injuries during combat on 8 August. His death was also confirmed by his wife Anna Wtikenwneider.

Artist’s exhibitions were attacked or canceled

Chychkan’s political views had been causing trouble for years.

His exhibitions faced repeated attacks. In 2017, more than a dozen people broke into a venue showing his work, assaulted a security guard, destroyed the exhibition, and stole four paintings.

This January, Odesa National Art Museum canceled his planned exhibition “With Ribbons and Flags” after critics claimed he equated Ukrainian and Russian soldiers.

Why the hostility? Chychkan was an anarcho-syndicalist who saw art as a tool for working-class liberation.

Born into an artistic family in 1986, he was largely self-taught and worked across graphics, posters, painting, street art, and performance. His pieces often featured political messaging that challenged conventional patriotic narratives.

“Anarchist convictions are my escapism, a wonderful world and a pillow into the existential pit, to fall more softly,” he once explained his political philosophy that advocated for decentralization and solidarity.

Devoted to his comrades and his country

BBC defense correspondent Jonathan Beale met Chychkan last December near Kupiansk in eastern Kharkiv Oblast. The encounter stuck with him.

“In many ways, he didn’t seem like an archetypal soldier,” Beale recalled. Chychkan’s unit was an eclectic mix—the artist fought alongside a vegan chef, software developer, and engineer.

But Chychkan’s commitment was clear. He shared his artwork with fellow soldiers and spoke passionately about politics and social justice.

“I didn’t know David very well, but he seemed sensitive and thoughtful to me. In many ways, he didn’t seem like an archetypal soldier, if such a thing exists. But he was clearly devoted to his comrades and his country,” Beale noted.

During their meeting, Chychkan was eagerly awaiting his son’s birth. “It pains me greatly that he won’t be with Anna to watch him grow up,” Beale said.

What he left behind

Chychkan’s wife Anna described him as someone who “loved life very much, but gave it for Ukraine, for the democratic, truly social country he dreamed of.”

Her Facebook post revealed both grief and anger—grief for the husband and father who won’t see his son grow up, anger at those who “persecuted him, insulted him, disrupted exhibitions and threatened him.”

The Resistance Committee remembered him differently than his critics did. They described someone who “always approached any work conscientiously, never hid behind others’ backs or behind his own social capital” and shared “deep thoughts about politics, ethics, and social justice” with fellow soldiers.

At the Odesa Museum of Modern Art, staff noted that visitors consistently lingered at Chychkan’s exhibits during the city’s Biennale. His art, they said, was dedicated to “the fight for freedom”—a fight he ultimately joined with more than brushes and paint.

Eight Nordic and Baltic nations just told Donald Trump exactly what they won’t accept in any Ukraine peace deal.

Their message, released four days before Trump meets Vladimir Putin in Alaska on 15 August, clearly states — don’t trade Ukrainian territory for a ceasefire.

According to Leaders of the Nordic-Baltic Eight, any diplomatic solution must protect the security interests of both Ukraine and Europe. The statement, published on the Swedish government website on 10 August, includes Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, and Sweden.

The statement emphasizes that “peace will only come through a combination of determined diplomacy, unwavering support for Ukraine, and consistent pressure on the Russian Federation to halt its unlawful war.”

The countries assert that talks can only occur within the context of a ceasefire and that Ukraine must receive “robust and credible security guarantees” to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. The statement reaffirms that “international borders must not be changed by force.”

“No decisions on Ukraine without Ukraine, and no decisions on Europe without Europe,” their joint statement declares.

This position aligns with President Zelenskyy’s stated readiness for peace talks conducted with full respect for Ukrainian sovereignty and right to determine its own future.

Earlier, other EU leaders, including France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Britain also warned Trump against pressuring Ukraine into making territorial concessions and emphasized their commitment to maintaining military support for Ukraine regardless of any such pressure.

But why do these countries even care?

The Nordic-Baltic countries have provided billions in military aid to Ukraine and maintain some of Europe’s most advanced defense industries.

Their assistance includes financial aid, training and equipment for Ukrainian brigades. They also uphold sanctions against Russia and work closely with the US and other partners to maintain strong diplomatic pressure on Russia to end the conflict.

Moreover, Finland shares an 830-mile border with Russia and the Baltic states lived under Soviet occupation for five decades so they are threatened by a potential future Russian attack.

Can Trump ignore these appeals?

Technically, yes. Practically, much harder. Any sustainable peace deal needs European buy-in for reconstruction funding, security guarantees, and long-term deterrence.

The Nordic-Baltic countries are betting Trump understands this. Their statement commits to continued military aid and sanctions against Russia while offering to help diplomatically—if their conditions are met.

Azerbaijan condemned Russian attacks on Azerbaijan’s energy infrastructure in Ukraine and ordered $2 million in humanitarian assistance to Kyiv.

The announcement follows a phone conversation on 10 August between Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, during which the Ukrainian president reported on Russian strikes against energy facilities.

The next day, Aliyev signed a decree directing Azerbaijan’s Energy Ministry to spend $2 million from the presidential reserve fund on electrical equipment manufactured in Azerbaijan. The decree cited “principles of humanism” but the timing sent a different message.

According to the presidential administration, Ukraine considers these attacks “a deliberate attempt by Russia to block pathways that guarantee energy independence for Ukraine and other European countries.”

Aliyev’s office stated that he specifically condemned Russian airstrikes on an oil depot belonging to Azerbaijani state company SOCAR and a gas compressor station that transports Azerbaijani gas to Ukraine. Russian forces struck the compressor station on the night of 6 August and the SOCAR oil depot on the night of 8 August.

The timing of these attacks is significant as Ukraine had recently begun receiving gas from Azerbaijan via the Trans-Balkan corridor for the first time. Despite the strikes, Aliyev emphasized that the attacks “will in no way lead to a suspension of energy cooperation between Azerbaijan and Ukraine.”

Why does this matter to Azerbaijan? The country spent years building energy partnerships with Europe to reduce dependence on Russian transit routes. Russia’s missiles effectively targeted Azerbaijan’s strategic pivot away from Moscow.

The condemnation may signal a broader shift in Azerbaijan’s support for Ukraine. Azerbaijani Telegram channels close to President Aliyev’s circle report that authorities may lift restrictions on transferring weapons from Azerbaijani stockpiles to Kyiv if Russian strikes on Azerbaijan-related energy facilities continue.

Russian military bloggers are already reporting that Baku has started producing 122mm and 155mm artillery shells for Ukraine.

The energy infrastructure attacks occur against a backdrop of deteriorating relations between Moscow and Baku.

On 27 June, representatives of the Azerbaijani diaspora were detained in Russia’s Yekaterinburg, with two people dying. In response, Baku detained and arrested approximately two dozen Russian citizens, including journalists from the pro-Kremlin agency “Sputnik Azerbaijan,” whose license was revoked in February. Some detainees face charges of drug smuggling and cyber fraud.

Aliyev also previously advised Ukraine to “not accept” Russian occupation of its territories. Now he’s putting resources behind those words.

Will NATO abandon Ukraine if Trump and Putin shake hands in Alaska on 15 August?

Not happening, says NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

“NATO has not abandoned its commitment to provide Ukraine with everything necessary so that it remains in the fight,” Rutte told CBS News. 

The weapons deliveries continue regardless of whatever emerges from the Trump-Putin summit, Rutte claims.

But why meet Putin at all? Trump’s calculation is simple: test whether the Russian leader actually wants peace talks or just more stalling time.

“It’s really crucial that a meeting takes place,” Rutte explained. “President Trump is making sure that Putin is serious.”

The stakes couldn’t be clearer. If Putin proves he’s genuinely interested in negotiations, talks expand to include Ukraine and European allies. If not? “Then it will stop there,” Rutte said.

Ukraine gets left out—for now

Here’s the immediate controversy: Ukraine won’t have a seat at Friday’s table. Putin specifically requested the bilateral format, and Trump agreed to “start off with Russia” before potentially bringing in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy later.

Does this worry NATO? Rutte brushes off the concern. Ukraine “will have to be—and will be—involved” when discussions turn to territory, security guarantees, and actual peace frameworks. The Friday meeting isn’t meant to decide Ukraine’s fate. It’s meant to figure out if serious negotiations are even possible.

Europe pays, America arms Ukraine

Meanwhile, the military support machine keeps churning. Trump’s Priority Ukraine Requirements List system—where European allies buy American weapons for Ukraine—has unlocked hundreds of millions in new commitments. The Netherlands ponied up 500 million euros. Denmark, Norway, and Sweden jointly matched that figure.

Why this matters: European allies are essentially funding American defense contractors to arm Ukraine. It’s politically genius for Trump—he can claim Europeans are paying while keeping American weapons factories humming.

Rutte credits Trump with “opening the floodgates” on weapons deliveries and breaking diplomatic deadlock through direct Putin engagement. Not exactly the criticism many expected from NATO leadership.

The territorial deadlock persists

Can any deal actually work? Here’s where things get complicated fast.

Trump has floated a controversial territorial swap proposal—Ukraine gives up some occupied land to Russia while potentially regaining other territory. The idea aims to break the current stalemate through mutual concessions.

Zelenskyy’s response? Absolutely not. The Ukrainian president firmly rejected any land concessions, stating that Ukrainians will not cede territory to occupiers. Ukraine’s constitution declares its territory “indivisible and inviolable”—making any swap legally problematic even if Zelenskyy wanted to consider it.

The proposal sparked outrage across Ukraine, with many viewing territorial concessions as outright betrayal. Yet polling reveals growing war fatigue: some Ukrainians show slight increased tolerance for territorial compromises following military setbacks in 2023.

Rutte threads this needle carefully. Russian occupation can never be legally recognized, he insists. But negotiations might address “how to deal with the factual situation that the Russians are holding, at this moment, Ukrainian territory.”

European allies echo this tension—supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty while recognizing that frozen conflicts might be the only path to stopping active warfare.

What Trump-Putin meeting actually tests

The 15 August Alaska meeting won’t solve anything definitively. Zelenskyy hasn’t confirmed whether he’ll attend any subsequent talks, adding another layer of uncertainty.

Instead, Friday probes a fundamental question: Does Putin want to end this war or just reset it on better terms?

If Putin arrives ready for genuine concessions, talks could expand quickly. If he’s fishing for sanctions relief while planning more offensives, Trump will likely walk away and let the weapons deliveries speak for themselves.

Either way, NATO’s position is locked: Ukraine gets armed until this ends, regardless of what happens between the world’s two most unpredictable leaders in an Alaskan conference room.

On the night of 11 August, drones reportedly struck the Arzamas Instrument-Making Plant in Russia’s Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, over 1000 km away from Ukraine’s border.

The targeted plant manufactures equipment for aviation and aerospace industries, producing gyroscopic instruments, control systems, onboard computers, steering mechanisms, and testing equipment. The facility also produces flow measurement devices and medical equipment.

The regional governor Gleb Nikitin described the strike as aimed at “industrial facilities” and said the casualties occurred among plant workers. He reported that the attack killed one worker and injured two others.

According to Russian news Telegram channels Astra and Mash, local residents reported hearing explosions throughout the city, with social media posts including video footage of the moments during the attack on the facility.

Ukrainian Telegram channels claimed responsibility for the strike on the Arzamas plant.

[UPDATE] Ukraine’s Security Service confirmed responsibility for the drone strike, with an informed SBU source telling Ukrainian news agency Hromadske that the attack specifically targeted the plant’s production of components for X-32 and X-101 cruise missiles.

“Russian defense industry enterprises that work for the war against Ukraine are absolutely legitimate military targets,” the SBU source stated, adding that the service continues efforts to demilitarize facilities that produce weapons used to attack Ukrainian cities.

Astra also established that the targeted facility positions itself as “one of the leading enterprises of the country’s defense-industrial complex.” Astra’s investigation revealed that 20% of the plant is owned by the Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern and that the facility operates under US and European Union sanctions. The channel also noted that the plant received the national “Golden Idea” award in 2020 for military-technical cooperation, and that as recently as Sunday, the facility had acquired new equipment.

Meanwhile, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that air defense systems intercepted 32 Ukrainian drones overnight, according to their official statement, though this figure could not be independently verified.

Just a day before, Ukrainian military intelligence (HUR) conducted a historic drone strike on the Lukoil-Ukhta oil refinery in Russia’s Komi Republic, approximately 2,000 km from the Ukrainian border.

The attack targeted and damaged a petroleum tank causing a spill, as well as a gas and gas condensate processing plant producing propane, butane, and gasoline. This refinery supplies fuel and lubricants to Russian forces, making it a strategic target in Ukraine’s efforts to degrade Russia’s war capabilities. 

Dozens of parliamentarians from various countries staged a coordinated walkout during a speech by Russian Federation Council Chairwoman Valentina Matvienko at the World Conference of Speakers of Parliaments in Switzerland on 30 July.

Why the mass walkout? According to Ukrainian Parliament Vice-Speaker Olena Kondratiuk, it sent a clear message about Russian aggression.

“This is a walkout against the aggressor,” Kondratiuk said, describing tears in her eyes as she watched international colleagues leave.

The half-empty hall, she argued, showed exactly how democratic parliaments view Russia.

Czech Parliament’s Chamber of Deputies Speaker Marketa Pekarova Adamova also made her reasoning explicit. She refused to be “a prop in the lies on which the criminal Kremlin regime is based.”

“She herself bears personal responsibility for the crime of aggression and all subsequent Russian atrocities after publicly approving the use of armed forces on Ukrainian territory,” Adamova wrote.

Better to spend time with colleagues “who support Ukraine in its fight for freedom and democracy,” she added.

But why was Matvienko allowed into Geneva at all? Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry had called her conference participation “disgraceful.” Spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi put it bluntly: her place should be “in the dock, not at international conferences.”

Here’s the problem: Matvienko appears on EU sanctions lists related to Russia’s invasion. So does much of the Russian delegation. Switzerland honors these sanctions—with one exception. The country permits sanctioned individuals to enter when visiting international organizations based there.

What had Matvienko been saying? Two days earlier, she invited international parliamentarians to visit occupied Ukrainian territories and see the “Alley of Angels.” This is a memorial in Donetsk that Russian forces erected allegedly commemorating children killed by Ukrainian forces in the conflict, which is considered a Russian propaganda narrative as there is no independent proof and convincing evidence. 

Earlier, Ukraine’s Security Service charged Matvienko in absentia in 2024 under multiple articles. According to investigators, she signed parliamentary decisions authorizing Russian troop deployment in Ukraine. She also approved ratification agreements for annexing occupied Ukrainian territories. She faces additional charges including incitement to wage aggressive war, for which Ukraine plans to prosecute her at a Special Tribunal.

A pilot trusted with Ukraine’s most sensitive air operations was secretly feeding targeting data to Russian intelligence, Ukraine’s Security Service says.

The major worked as a flight instructor in an air brigade responsible for shooting down Russian missiles and drones. His unit also conducted ground strikes supporting Ukrainian army operations. Perfect access.

What was he selling? Coordinates of F-16 and Mirage 2000 airbases. Flight schedules. Aircraft tail numbers. Even pilot names.

The Security Service of Ukraine announced the arrest on 30 July, revealing how military counterintelligence tracked the officer as he prepared to pass another batch of classified information to Russia’s GRU military intelligence service.

But the betrayal went deeper than basic intelligence gathering.

The major authored analytical reports for his Russian handlers, outlining specific tactics for combined missile and drone strikes designed to penetrate Ukrainian air defenses. Essentially providing a how-to guide for destroying the aircraft he was supposed to protect.

How did he communicate with Moscow? Anonymous email channels and encrypted messaging apps, according to investigators.

The timing matters. Ukraine has been integrating Western fighters including F-16s and Mirage 2000s into its air force operations. Russia has repeatedly targeted these aircraft with long-range strikes, making the intelligence particularly valuable.

The major faces life imprisonment with property confiscation under Ukraine’s wartime treason laws. The Security Service in western Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast is handling the investigation.

Ten days. That’s how long Donald Trump gave Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine before facing new American punishment.

But will Congress wait that long?

Senator Richard Blumenthal thinks not. The Connecticut Democrat wants an immediate vote on sweeping Russia sanctions legislation, telling Suspilne News that Putin “does not deserve additional time.”

Blumenthal and his Republican co-author Lindsey Graham have been pushing the sanctions bill since April. Eighty-one senators support it. Yet it sits in limbo while Trump experiments with presidential ultimatums.

“Everything the president is doing is in the right direction, but I strongly advocate for sanctions to be 500%, not 100%,” Blumenthal said. 

Blumenthal emphasized the importance of demonstrating unity between the executive branch and Congress on Ukraine policy.

Republican Senator Roger Marshall offered a different perspective, telling Suspilne News that Trump should be given “maximum flexibility” during the 10-day period. However, Marshall acknowledged that “Putin is not responding to anything” and advocated for comprehensive sanctions including potential banking sector measures and secondary sanctions.

Graham takes a harder line. If Putin won’t negotiate, Trump should target China and India—Russia’s biggest oil customers.

“He can do this through an executive order or through legislative initiative in Congress,” Graham told Suspilne News.

Can they actually pass this thing? The numbers look good. Blumenthal counts 85 Senate supporters and believes they can reach 90 votes if needed.

Despite this backing and failed ceasefire negotiations in Istanbul, Trump had previously stated in May that Washington would not impose additional Russia sanctions.

Moscow’s response? Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov acknowledged the deadline but said Russia’s “special military operation” continues and negotiations require momentum from both sides.

This stance reflects their determination to sustain the war despite international pressure and economic measures intended to weaken Russia. 

Meanwhile, Ukraine keeps destroying Russian military assets faster than Moscow can replace them. The senators argue economic pressure should match that pace.

Graham puts it simply: “The president will increase pressure on Russia’s clients to get Putin to the negotiating table.”

Whether that pressure comes through congressional action or Trump’s executive measures may depend on how the next few days unfold. Putin’s silence on Trump’s deadline suggests he’s betting the president won’t follow through.

Ukrainian special forces landed on a Russian-controlled island in the Black Sea on 28 July night and wiped out the entire garrison without any Ukrainian casualties.

The target? Tendrivska Spit, a 65-kilometer sliver of land jutting into the Black Sea near occupied Kherson. Why this particular piece of sand and scrub?

The Russians had turned it into an electronic warfare hub. Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate says their commandos destroyed a “Zont” jamming complex and a “Rosa” radar station along with the troops manning them.

Here’s what makes this operation notable: Tendrivska Spit sits in contested waters where both sides have been trading blows for months. The narrow island—barely 1.8 kilometers wide at its broadest point—gave Russian forces eyes and electronic ears across a significant chunk of the northern Black Sea.

Not anymore. Ukrainian intelligence released footage showing their blue and yellow flag flying over the position.

How did they pull it off? The operation relied on boats funded through a private initiative called “Boats for HUR,” run by the Ukrainian Diana Podolyanchuk Charitable Foundation. International donors helped pay for the watercraft that carried the assault team to their target.

The timing matters. Ukrainian forces have been systematically targeting Russian positions on isolated islands and coastal areas, using their advantage in small boat operations. Each successful raid forces Russia to commit more resources to defending scattered outposts.

Can Russia replace what they lost? The electronic warfare equipment destroyed in the raid represents sophisticated gear that takes months to produce and deploy. The radar station gave Russian forces advance warning of Ukrainian naval movements—a capability now gone.

The operation signals Ukraine’s growing confidence in conducting amphibious raids deep behind Russian lines. Previous strikes hit Zmiinyi (Snake) Island and other Black Sea positions, but Tendrivska Spit sits closer to the Ukrainian mainland, suggesting expanded operational reach.

Russian forces targeted a Ukrainian Ground Forces training unit in a missile attack that reportedly left three military personnel dead and 18 wounded, according to an official statement from the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

The military command has not disclosed the specific location or identity of the targeted unit for operational security reasons. However, military analyst Serhii Bezkrestnov, known by his call sign “Flash,” identified the site as the Honcharivskyi training ground in Chernihiv Oblast.

Bezkrestnov suggested that safety protocol violations may have contributed to the casualties, stating that personnel were aware of reconnaissance drone activity in the area and had received air raid warnings.

“Everyone knew that a UAV-spotter was hanging over the object. Everyone heard the alarm,” he wrote in his assessment of the incident.

The Ground Forces have established an investigative commission led by the chief of the Military Law Enforcement Service to determine the circumstances surrounding the personnel losses. Military officials indicated that any commanders found responsible for actions or negligence leading to casualties will face accountability measures.

This attack continues a pattern of Russian strikes against Ukrainian military training facilities.

On 22 June, Russian forces hit a mechanized brigade training ground in southern Kherson Oblast, resulting in three deaths and 11 injuries. Earlier incidents occurred on 4 June in Poltava Oblast and 1 June in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, where an Iskander missile struck a training facility.

Russian forces launched a large-scale drone attack against Ukraine during the night of 30 July, causing civilian casualties and infrastructure damage across multiple regions. The assault injured at least five people and sparked fires at several enterprises.

The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Russia deployed 78 unmanned aerial vehicles of various types, including strike drones of the Iranian-designed Shahed type and decoy drones.

Ukrainian air defense systems successfully neutralized 51 of the attacking drones, with 27 recorded as hitting targets across seven locations and debris from destroyed drones falling in two additional areas.

Three civilians injured in Kharkiv 

The northeastern city of Kharkiv sustained significant damage when Russian drones struck the Shevchenkivskyi and Slobidskyi districts at approximately 1:55 a.m. Three people were injured in the attacks, according to Kharkiv Mayor Ihor Terekhov.

In the Shevchenkivskyi district, drone strikes damaged a car wash, shattered windows in apartment buildings, and hit a supermarket, while several vehicles caught fire. The Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor’s Office confirmed that drone debris injured a 24-year-old woman, a 33-year-old man, and a 62-year-old woman.

Russian forces used “Geran-2” type drones for the city attack. A second strike hit the Slobidskyi district around 2:40 a.m., damaging a non-residential building. Local prosecutors have opened war crimes investigations into both incidents.

Dnipropetrovsk Oblast suffers enterprise damage

Russian attacks on Dnipropetrovsk region resulted in two civilian injuries and significant agricultural losses, according to regional military administration head Serhii Lysak. Ukrainian forces intercepted 24 drones targeting the region, but several strikes reached their intended targets.

In Pavlohrad, a 70-year-old man sustained injuries and required hospitalization after attacks damaged a transport enterprise and triggered multiple fires.

The assault also struck the local railway station, disrupting tracks and contact networks, though Ukraine’s national railway company Ukrzaliznytsia reported no casualties among passengers or staff.

Russian forces deployed FPV drones against three communities in the Synelnykivskyi district, destroying a farm and killing approximately 20 head of cattle, while damaging private enterprises.

In Mezhivska community, FPV drone attacks wounded one woman and destroyed five vehicles.

Previous day’s deadly strike

The latest assault followed a devastating missile attack on 29 July that struck Kamianske in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.

That attack partially destroyed a three-story non-residential building and damaged nearby medical facilities, including a maternity hospital and city hospital department.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed the death toll reached three people, including 23-year-old pregnant woman Diana, with the total number of casualties rising to 22.

Soldiers of Song (2024)

Director: Ryan Smith (American)
Awards: Tribeca Film Festival premiere, Warsaw International Film Festival nomination (Best Documentary Feature)

What is it about? The film follows Ukrainian musicians who transformed their art into weapons of resistance against Russian aggression.

The documentary weaves together multiple extraordinary narratives: paramedic “Ptashka” (“Bird”) singing folk songs in Azovstal’s basement to lift survivor’s spirits during the siege of Mariupol in 2022; Slava Vakarchuk of the band Okean Elzy performing atop bombed buildings to raise awareness and visiting wounded children in hospitals; Andriy Khlyvnyuk of Boombox who joined the armed forces while continuing to raise funds for his unit through concerts, balancing his dual roles as drone operator and musician.

Through the Cultural Forces initiative, the film shows how music reaches soldiers directly at the front, where performances become vital sources of motivation and spiritual strength, embodying the philosophy that “Beauty urges us to align ourselves to experience the triumph of soul over body.”

Where to watch: Apple TV, Prime Video, Google Play

Why should you watch it? This shows how culture itself becomes a battlefield. Ukrainian artists fight for the freedom to create in Ukrainian language as Russians ban it on occupied territories. Making beauty becomes an act of defiance against cultural genocide while the film asks crucial questions: “How many Ukrainian musicians has Russia killed, and how many more will it kill if not stopped?”

Quote from the song in the film:

“And here we walk in the battle of life—Solid, durable, unbreakable, like granite, For crying hasn’t given freedom to anyone yet, But whoever is a fighter, he conquers the world.” 

Faith Under Siege (2025)

Director: Yaroslav Lodygin (Ukrainian)

What is it about? The film exposes brutal persecution of Christians in Russian-occupied Ukraine, documenting bombed churches, imprisoned or killed pastors, and the abduction of over 19,000 Ukrainian children. It follows Evangelical and Protestant believers in what was once called the post-Soviet “Bible Belt” as they struggle to keep faith alive in secret.

While Russia spreads propaganda claiming Ukraine persecutes Christians by restricting Kremlin-linked Orthodox churches amid the war, the film exposes the brutal reality: it’s Russian occupation forces systematically pressuring, torturing, imprisoning, and killing Christians in occupied Ukrainian territories, especially those who refuse to collaborate with the FSB.

Where to watch: YouTube

Why should you watch it? This exposes a classic authoritarian tactic of accusing your opponent of your own sins while the international community’s attention is divided. The film calls believers to prayer, awareness, and solidarity while showing how Ukrainian Christians stand strong against religious persecution, proving that faith can survive even under the most brutal conditions and revealing the true face of Russia’s so-called “defense” of Christianity.

Porcelain War (2024)

Director: Brendan Bellomo & Slava Leontyev (Ukrainian-American)
Awards: Sundance Grand Jury Prize winner, Oscar nominated 2025 (Best documentary feature)

What is it about? Set in war-torn Kharkiv close to the Russian border, the film follows three Ukrainian artists who create delicate porcelain figurines while living through the brutal reality of Russian invasion, filled with destruction and terror.

Slava, a former Ukrainian Special Forces soldier, transforms from artist to weapons instructor, teaching civilians how to fight while continuing to craft ceramics with his wife Anya. She developed her unique style of painting on ceramic miniatures at Kharkiv School of Arts and channels her resistance through art that captures their “idyllic past, uncertain present, and hope for the future.” Meanwhile, Andrey, originally from annexed Crimea (Feodosia), serves as first-time cinematographer documenting their story while simultaneously working to get his family to safety abroad.

The film contrasts stunning Ukrainian landscapes with the wreckage caused by war missiles, showing how these artists defiantly find beauty amid destruction while some take up guns alongside their brushes.

The jury called the filmmaking “the ultimate pursuit of good” while resisting totalitarian aggression.

Where to watch: Prime Video, Takflix

Why should you watch it? This film embodies how artists put beauty back into a crumbling world, showing that while it’s easy to make people afraid, it’s hard to destroy their passion for living. It’s both an intimate love story and a powerful statement about art’s role in resistance.

No Sleep Til Kyiv (2025)

Director: Eric Liebman (American)

What is it about? The documentary follows international volunteers, including American homebuilder Peter Duke from Orlando, who leave their comfortable lives to join convoys delivering military trucks and other essential aid from Estonia to Ukrainian soldiers in Kyiv.

Working with the 69th Sniffing Brigade (NAFO), volunteers drive 30+ hours straight through Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, sleeping through air raid sirens and witnessing Russian destruction firsthand.

Stories of ordinary Ukrainians who paused their jobs to defend their homes are woven throughout the film, alongside international volunteers who take time from their lives to assist them.

Duke draws powerful parallels between Ukraine’s fight and America’s birth in 1776, saying “All of us in Western democracies that hope for peace and security need Ukraine to succeed.”

Where to watch: Here

Why should you watch it? The film offers an American perspective on why Ukraine’s fight matters globally—if Russia succeeds, the authoritarianism will spread further, possibly affecting countries like Taiwan and South Korea.

The film also shows how ordinary citizens can get involved in fighting Russian aggression without wearing a uniform, demonstrating that remarkable acts of selflessness and purpose transcend borders and politics.

20 Days in Mariupol (2023)

Director: Mstyslav Chernov (Ukraine)
Awards: Ukraine’s first-ever Academy Award (Best Documentary 2024), BAFTA winner, Pulitzer Prize, Sundance Audience Award

What is it about? The film follows Ukrainian journalists working for Associated Press who remained the last and only international reporters in besieged Mariupol during the first weeks of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.

Chernov and his team documented Russian airstrikes on a maternity hospital, mass graves, frightened people huddled in shelters, and the deaths of civilians, including a 4-year-old girl as the doctors desperately tried to save her life, while Russian officials dismissed all their footage as “fakes.”

Many conversations in the film are conducted in Russian, exposing the cynicism of Moscow’s claim to be “saving Russian speakers.” 

Chernov said he wishes he never had to make this film and would exchange all recognition for Russia never invading Ukraine.

“My brain desperately wants to forget this, but the camera won’t let it happen,” the director says in the film.

Where to watch:  Prime Video, Apple TV, Netflix, Takflix

Why should you watch it? This is raw historical documentation at its finest—no contrived drama, just authentic footage that speaks for itself. As Chernov notes, “This is painful to watch—but it must be painful to watch.” It stands as crucial evidence of Russian war crimes and the price Ukrainians pay for freedom.

Quote from the film:

“War is like an X-ray — all human insides become visible. Good people become better, bad people become worse.”

A House Made of Splinters (2022)

Director: Simon Lereng Wilmont (Danish)
Awards: Sundance Best Director Award, Oscar nominated in 2023, FIPRESCI Award

What is it about? Set in a special orphanage in Lysychansk, an eastern Ukrainian town exhausted by Russia’s war, the film follows three children temporarily separated from their parents and living in danger near the frontlines in Donetsk Oblast. 

While they wait for custody decisions from authorities and courts that will determine whether they return home or move to new families, a small group of strong-willed social workers work tirelessly to create an almost magical safe space. These selfless caregivers give moments of joy and calm to children, bringing them back to their childhood that has almost been lost amid the family drama and ongoing conflict around them.

Where to watch: Apple TV+, Amazon Prime Video, Takflix

Why should you watch it? This deeply intimate portrait shows war’s long-term impact on society’s most vulnerable members through an extraordinarily poignant lens. Danish director explores how conflict affects children, offering a profoundly moving look at resilience, hope, and the power of human compassion even in the darkest circumstances.

Us, Our Pets and the War (2024)

Director: Anton Ptushkin (Ukrainian YouTuber)

What is it about? The documentary tells stories of people and their animals when Russia’s full-scale invasion began in 2022—from cats and dogs in abandoned apartments and shelters to lions, tigers, bears, lemurs, and even Igoryok the Yemeni chameleon in zoos.

It features famous pets like Patron the dog and Shafa the cat, plus soldiers, volunteers, foreigners, and Ukrainians participating in rescue missions everywhere from bomb shelters to the front lines.

The main idea of the film comes from shelter founder Asia Serpinska: “Save animals to stay human.” 

Where to watch: Netflix

Why should you watch it? It shows how rescuing animals becomes both a way to preserve humanity amid violence and a form of mutual salvation—revealing the extraordinary close connection between people and animals that war has only strengthened. 

Quote from the film:

“When it seemed that we were saving animals, in reality, it was animals that saved us.”

Why would Ukraine’s foreign ministry call an international conference attendance “disgraceful”?

The answer sits in a Geneva conference hall where Valentina Matvienko, head of Russia’s Federation Council, addressed fellow parliamentarians this week at the Inter-Parliamentary Union conference. Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi didn’t mince words: her place is “in the dock, not at international conferences.”

From the podium in Switzerland, Matvienko invited foreign colleagues to visit Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory.

“Please come to Donbas, look at the ‘Alley of Angels,’ which is dedicated to the memory of these murdered children,” she told the assembly an old Russian propaganda narrative. “Russia was forced to intervene to stop this bloodshed.”

This narrative presents Russia as a rescuer and frames its aggression as a “humanitarian mission” while providing highly questionable or fabricated stories.

How did a sanctioned Russian official even reach Switzerland? The country joined EU sanctions targeting Matvienko and other Russian officials. But Swiss policy includes a loophole—sanctioned individuals can enter when participating in international organizations headquartered there.

Matvienko didn’t travel alone. Her delegation included State Duma Deputy Chairman Pyotr Tolstoy and “LDNR” leader Leonid Slutsky—multiple members appear on Western sanctions lists connected to Ukraine’s invasion, Radio Free Europe reported.

Ukraine’s foreign minister went further than diplomatic protests. He urged conference participants with “self-respect” to avoid shaking hands with Matvienko, calling her hands “stained with Ukrainian blood.” Ukraine plans to pursue her prosecution at a Special Tribunal for Russian aggression.

“The Genocidal Matvienko bears personal responsibility for the crime of aggression and all subsequent atrocities after publicly endorsing the use of Russian armed forces on Ukrainian territory,” he wrote.

Ukraine and the Council of Europe established a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine on 25 June 2025, to prosecute Russian leaders for the invasion. The tribunal fills a gap left by the International Criminal Court, which lacks jurisdiction over aggression crimes in this case because Russia doesn’t recognize the relevant ICC provisions.

According to investigation findings reported by Ukrainian security services, Matvienko signed parliamentary decisions authorizing Russian military deployment in Ukraine before the full-scale invasion began.

She also reportedly approved ratification agreements for annexing occupied portions of Ukrainian regions to Russia. The Security Service of Ukraine has filed charges against her in absentia under multiple articles, including incitement to wage aggressive war.

Pro-Ukrainian hackers launched a devastating cyberattack against Aeroflot, Russia’s government-owned flagship airline, canceling 50 flights and leaving hundreds of passengers stranded at Moscow airports on 28 July.

Two hacker groups claimed responsibility for a cyberattack that allegedly destroyed the carrier’s internal IT infrastructure.

The flight disruptions affected routes from Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport to destinations including Minsk, Yerevan, Yekaterinburg, Kaliningrad, and St. Petersburg.

Hundreds of passengers stuck at Moscow airport

Chaos erupted at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport as hundreds of frustrated Aeroflot passengers found themselves trapped in a digital nightmare. After waiting hours for flights that would never depart, travelers discovered they couldn’t even leave the airport easily—bottlenecks formed at exit passages, forcing people to stand in line just to get out of the building.

Traffic jams clogged roads outside as passengers abandoned their travel plans en masse, with many unable to secure refunds since the airline’s systems were down and only call centers could process requests.

According to Russian Telegram channel Baza, the scene resembled a mass evacuation as Aeroflot representatives urged people with canceled flights to simply go home rather than wait at the airport, leaving travelers stranded with no clear timeline for when normal operations might resume or whether their money could be recovered.

Pro-Ukrainian hackers claim responsibility

Anti-Russian groups Silent Crow and Belarusian Cyber Partisans BY claimed they spent a year infiltrating the airline’s network before destroying approximately 7,000 servers, explicitly linking their attack to Russia’s war against Ukraine and signing off with “Glory to Ukraine! Long live Belarus!”

The hackers say they accessed 122 hypervisors and 43 virtualization systems. They allegedly copied 12 terabytes of flight databases, 8 terabytes of corporate files, and 2 terabytes of email. Personal data of every Russian who ever flew Aeroflot? Gone, according to their statement.

“All these resources are now inaccessible or destroyed, restoration will require possibly tens of millions of dollars. The damage is strategic,” the hackers stated in their message.

Cyberattack causes chaos in Aeroflot’s work

The attack’s immediate impact was evident in Aeroflot’s operations. According to Baza’s source within the airline, employees could not access flight plans, contact crew members, or determine aircraft locations. 

One Aeroflot employee described the scene: “I came to work, but we can’t print flight plans, nobody knows anything. I can’t even find the crew number, can’t call the captain.”

The employee continued: “All planes are grounded, management knows nothing: where the plane is, who’s flying, where they’re flying, crew numbers. There’s absolutely nothing.”

Only flights with pre-calculated plans could depart. Everyone else waited. Some crews spent hours sitting in aircraft with no instructions. Many employees were simply sent home.

Russia’s General Prosecutor’s Office confirmed the disruption was a cyberattack, not technical failure, as the hackers promised to publish stolen personal data from every Russian who ever flew the country’s largest airline.

Hackers expose vulnerabilities of Russian security services

Here’s what makes this attack different: The hackers claim they maintained access for an entire year before striking. That’s not opportunistic hacking—that’s patient intelligence work. They allegedly penetrated what they call “Tier0” systems, the core infrastructure that keeps airlines running.

Why target an airline? The hackers were explicit. Their statement addressed Russian security services directly: “You are incapable of protecting even your key infrastructures.” They called it a message to “all employees of the repressive apparatus.”

The groups signed off with “Glory to Ukraine! Long live Belarus!”—making their allegiances clear.

The attack occurred as Russia’s aviation sector already struggles under international sanctions and limited access to Western aircraft and parts. Adding cyberattacks from Ukraine-aligned groups to that list creates a new vulnerability Moscow hadn’t fully considered.

An unidentified unmanned aircraft violated Lithuania’s airspace on 28 July, likely originating from Belarusian territory, prompting a full-scale security response.

According to LRT, residents began reporting drone sightings to police early 28 July morning, with witnesses describing an aircraft flying at approximately 200 meters altitude near the capital Vilnius.

“In the morning, reports came from residents about an unmanned aircraft that most likely flew into Lithuania from Belarus,” said Darius Buta, representative of the National Crisis Center. “According to reports, the drone was seen at an altitude of about 200 meters, last time – near Vilnius.”

Lithuanian police activated all available forces and notified other security services following the reports. Authorities have urged citizens to report any new sightings while warning against approaching the aircraft if spotted on the ground.

Video footage circulating online suggests the aircraft may be a Russia “Geran” or “Gerbera” type drone, identifiable by its distinctive sound signature. Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė told LRT that officials are still working to determine the aircraft type.

“Given that Belarus is preparing for exercises, the probability of incidents, including unintentional ones, is increasing,” Šakalienė added.

This marks the second such violation in recent weeks. On 10 July, a Russian “Gerbera” drone entered Lithuanian territory via Belarus, prompting Lithuania to file a formal protest note with Belarusian authorities.

Poland deploys aircraft to patrol its airspace as Russia attacks Ukraine

Meanwhile, Poland scrambled aircraft to patrol its airspace overnight Sunday into Monday as Russia launched missile attacks against Ukraine.

According to the Polish Armed Forces Operational Command, both Polish and allied aircraft were deployed while ground-based air defense systems reached maximum readiness in areas close to Ukraine’s border.

“These actions are preventive in nature and are aimed at securing the airspace and protecting citizens, especially in areas adjacent to the threatened region,” the Operational Command wrote.

Recently, Ukraine, Poland, and Lithuania formed a new alliance within the Lublin Triangle to counter Russia’s manipulation of shared history. They established a Historians’ Forum aimed at preventing Moscow from exploiting historical events to sow discord among the countries amid the ongoing war with Russia.

The alliance also focuses on strengthening military and cultural ties and supporting Ukraine’s EU and NATO integration, with regular foreign minister meetings planned at least twice a year.

A Boeing-777 lifted off from Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport on 27 July evening bound for Pyongyang. On board: Russia’s natural resources minister and dozens of passengers making aviation history.

Why does this matter? Russia just launched its first direct commercial flight from its capital to North Korea—a route that didn’t exist until now.

The Nordwind Airlines jet departed at 7:30 p.m. Moscow time for the eight-hour journey. Russian Minister of Natural Resources and Ecology Alexander Kozlov occupied one of the seats, according to TASS news agency. The return flight is scheduled for 29 July.

Rosaviation granted the airline permission to operate flights to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in early July. The Moscow-Pyongyang route will operate monthly, with officials citing the need to “build sustainable demand and flight occupancy.”

The new service represents the first direct commercial link between the Russian capital and Pyongyang, though limited flight connections already exist between Vladivostok and the North Korean capital. Those flights are operated by North Korean carrier Air Koryo, with tickets available only through organized tours to North Korea.

The flight’s timing coincides with North Korea’s Victory Day commemorations on 27 July, marking the 70th anniversary of the Korean War armistice in 1953. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un participated in the celebrations and referenced Russia’s role in what he termed the “anti-imperialist struggle.”

The expanded flight connections come as Western sanctions have severely restricted Russia’s aviation access to Europe and North America since 2022. Russian travelers to Europe now must transit through third countries, typically Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates, or Azerbaijan.

Russia-North Korea relations

North Korea has openly supported Russia’s military actions in Ukraine and signed a strategic partnership agreement with Moscow that functions as a military alliance.

Last year, the two countries resumed regular passenger rail service that had been suspended during the pandemic.

North Korean soldiers also participated in combat operations alongside Russian forces in Kursk Oblast.

According to Forbes, North Korea is dramatically increasing its military presence in Russia’s war against Ukraine, preparing to send 25,000–30,000 more troops—tripling its original deployment.

This escalation highlights Russia’s growing dependence on foreign soldiers to compensate for enormous battlefield losses, as President Putin seeks to avoid domestic mobilization. North Korean troops, who have already suffered thousands of casualties, are being deployed alongside substantial shipments of artillery, shells, and missiles—deliveries that now fuel about 70% of Russia’s artillery fire.

Russian forces conducted a large-scale aerial assault on Ukraine during the night of 28 July, targeting multiple regions across the country, with Kyiv, Kropyvnytskyi, Khmelnytskyi and Dnipropetrovsk oblasts sustaining the most damage and casualties.

According to regional authorities, at least 10 people were injured in the attacks, including three children aged 2, 3, and 15 years old.

On 27 and 28 July, Russia launched 331 aerial weapons, comprising 324 strike drones of Shahed type and decoy drones, 4 Kh-101 cruise missiles, and 3 Kh-47 M2 “Kinzhal” aeroballistic missiles, the Air Force reported.

Ukrainian air defenses successfully intercepted 311 of the attacking weapons by 09:30, including 309 strike drones and 2 cruise missiles. The primary target direction was Starokostiantyniv in Khmelnytskyi Oblast, according to the military.

Eight civilians injured in Kyiv

In the capital, the Darnytskyi district bore the brunt of the attack when a residential 25-story building was struck.

According to Kyiv City Military Administration head Tymur Tkachenko, the blast wave shattered windows and damaged balcony glazing from the 3rd to 11th floors in one entrance, with additional window damage throughout the building.

The National Police reported five people injured by shrapnel, including a 2-year-old girl who suffered lacerations to her foot. However, Tkachenko provided updated casualty figures, stating that eight people were injured overall, with four requiring hospitalization, one in serious condition. Among the hospitalized was a 3-year-old child with shrapnel wounds.

“The Russians cynically once again launch enemy strike UAVs at civilian objects, at our people,” Tkachenko wrote.

The courtyard and several cars parked near the building were also damaged, according to both the National Police and city administration. 

Philharmonic hall damaged in Kropyvnytskyi

The city of Kropyvnytskyi in central Ukraine experienced a drone attack that resulted in a fire, according to local authorities. No casualties were reported, but the blast wave damaged the premises of the regional philharmonic hall. Emergency services continued firefighting operations as of the morning report.

Two people injured in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast

Two people were injured in drone and artillery attacks on the Nikopol district, according to Regional Administration Head Serhii Lysak. The casualties included a 15-year-old girl and a 49-year-old woman, both receiving outpatient treatment.

Lysak reported that Russian forces attacked the area with drones and artillery, affecting the district center and several communities including Marhanets, Myriv, Chervonohryhorivka, and Pokrovsk.

The attacks damaged an educational institution, one apartment building, three private houses, three utility buildings, and power lines, while also causing fires.

He looks just like an ordinary man who shares on social media how he loves and adores his “wifey” and two kids, takes pride in his medical career and celebrates national holidays.

However, this 34-year-old Russian man has a dark secret.

Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) know him as “Doctor Evil” — a medical professional who systematically shocked them witsh stun guns instead of treating their injuries. Who forced them to bark like dogs. Who refused medical care to dying prisoners.

Social media helps identify Doctor Evil

An investigation by Schemes, the investigative unit of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, traced the identity of Doctor Evil through meticulous research, while Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project translated it into English.

Reporters obtained a list of 177 Ukrainian POWs who had been held at Colony No. 10 from Ukrainian law enforcement sources. Many of them were captured during the siege of Mariupol in 2022 and sent deep into Russia.

Mordovia is a forested region in central Russia known for its extensive network of prisons and detention centers, a legacy of the Soviet gulag system that has made it synonymous with harsh incarceration conditions.

But how do you identify someone when the doctor usually wore masks and prisoners often had bags over their heads? The investigators faced a significant challenge: identifying someone based primarily on voice and behavior, with only brief glimpses of his face.

The breakthrough came from social media. Medical services for Colony No. 10 come from one unit: Medical-Sanitary Unit No. 13. Schemes found their VKontakte [Russian version of Facebook] pages filled with photos from award ceremonies and videos of doctors singing at workplace parties, their faces clearly visible.

As soon as former POW Pavlo Afisov heard the voice in one of the video clips, he started calling reporters before they’d even finished watching, his voice shaking with recognition. “That’s him.” The voice that had haunted him for months—manic, screechy, “indescribable” as prisoners called it—was unmistakable. Another, Yulian Pylypey, cropped a photo and circled a blonde man in a white coat. “The psychopath is the one on the left.”

All fifty former prisoners who agreed to speak identified the same person: Ilya Sorokin, the man they knew as “Doctor Evil.”

“Worse than beatings”: the psychological torture that cut deepest

Prisoners described how Sorokin forced them to perform degrading acts. He made prisoners crawl across the floor and bark like dogs, according to multiple testimonies. One Ukrainian prisoner became known for his barking ability and received special attention that revealed the doctor’s psychological sadism.

“Every time someone passed by, he had to bark. God forbid he didn’t. The doctor would immediately shout: ‘You, bark!'” recalled Yulian Pylypey, who spent 171 days in the colony.

The degradation followed carefully crafted patterns designed to strip away human dignity. Prisoners were forced to mimic roosters: “Cock-a-doodle-doo, guys, cock-a-doodle-doo!” They had to answer commercial jingles like trained animals responding to cues.

“He would shout ‘Yogurt!’ and we would have to shout ‘Danone!'” said Pavlo Afisov, who endured 614 days of this treatment. “Pepsi!” would be met with “Pshhhhh!” and “Who lives under the sea?” required the response “Spongebob SquarePants!”

Why children’s cartoons and advertisements? Former prisoners realized the randomness was precisely the point and that the absurdity amplified the humiliation.

But the most psychologically devastating question came repeatedly, designed to attack their very identity: “His favorite question for all of us was, ‘Who are you?’ We had to reply, ‘Faggots,'” Afisov recalled.

This wasn’t interrogation or even punishment for specific infractions. Former prisoners described recognizing something far more disturbing—pure cruelty without purpose.

“You could see he was a psychopath,” said Nikita Pikulyk, who spent 336 days in the colony. “He got pleasure from this. Normal people, even cruel ones, usually have a reason. But with him, the cruelty was the reason.”

The psychological torture revealed a mind that found satisfaction in the systematic destruction of human dignity, making prisoners understand they were dealing with someone who tortured not because he had to, but because he wanted to.

Sorokin demanded prisoners shout “Glory to Russian medicine!” If they refused, consequences followed. “Best case, you get shocked a few times by the doctor,” said Pylypey. “In the worst cases, special forces would be called into the cell to ‘educate’ the prisoners.”

“Screaming nonsense, reciting poems or songs—to me, it was one of the most degrading things. Honestly, I would rather be hit with a baton 10 times than do that,” Pylypey shared.

Sorokin seemed to understand this. “He gets aesthetic pleasure from the fact that you stand before him on all fours, your hands raised, eyes closed, you have nothing,” Afisov testified.

Explore further

United24: Ukrainian soldier tells how Russian surgeon burnt Glory to Russia on his body while in captivity

Pills replaced by electric shocks

Doctor Evil used his medical position to gain access to prisoners, then administered electric shocks instead of treatment. When prisoners requested medical help, he would order them to extend their hands through cell windows.

“Hand, bitch!” prisoners recalled him shouting. Instead of receiving pills, their outstretched hands would be shocked with a stun gun.

“Now I’ll experiment,” Pylypey remembered Sorokin saying before turning the stun gun to “maximum.”

One former POW Oleksandr Kiriienko described the pattern: “Whoever turned to him, he always carried a stun gun. Yes, the door would open, and whoever had asked for him — he’d hit them with the stun gun and say, ‘Will you ask for a pill again?’ Of course, the answer was ‘no.'”

Sorokin’s denial of medical care extended to life-threatening situations. Prisoners reported being refused basic medical supplies and pain relief for serious conditions.

One prisoner with a rotting tooth that caused “agonizing pain” was denied painkillers, according to testimony.

Another case involved Volodymyr Yykhymenko, who died at the prison. His cellmate, Valentyn Poliansky, told investigators that prisoners asked Sorokin to examine Yykhymenko’s bleeding, swollen ear before his death, but the doctor refused.

“You could absolutely never approach Dr. Evil. He didn’t treat anyone,” Afisov stated.

Deaths in Russian captivity are not rare. Four Ukrainian servicemen died at Colony No. 10—two in 2023, two in 2024. Official causes: pneumonia, exhaustion, malnutrition.

However, former prisoners provided starker details: “My cellmate died in front of me—from dystrophy. He died because his legs were badly rotting and there were heart complaints.”

Another wrote to journalists: “Through systematic torture he died before my eyes.”

Russians turn service dogs into torture tools

The colony staff found new ways to terrorize prisoners as months passed. Service dogs, meant for security, became instruments of torture—with Doctor Evil often present to watch the violence unfold.

During what should have been a routine morning inspection, guards forced prisoners to crawl out of their cells on hands and knees. At that moment, staff released a service dog without a leash or muzzle.

“The dog reacted to sharp movements, and since we were crawling, it tried to grab everyone, bite, switched from one to another. It mostly bit hands and legs,” recalled Nikita Pikulyk. “Because of this, the guys had very terrible injuries—wounds that rot and in such conditions will never heal on their own.”

The attacks followed a sadistic ritual. Pavlo Afisov described how guards would position prisoners on all fours while the dog circled them, sniffing. “The dog begins, while you stand on all fours, sniffing you—legs, butt and so on. And then the doctor just tells it the phrase: ‘Try.’ ‘Try carefully or try as you like.'”

The targeting was deliberate and cruel. “One time I felt this on myself. The dog approached, sniffed, chose a place for itself and bit my buttock,” Afisov recalled. “Someone was bitten, I heard, in the balls. Some were bitten to blood.”

Guards controlled the violence like a twisted game, giving commands that turned medical examinations into torture sessions. The psychological impact matched the physical wounds—prisoners never knew when the next “inspection” would bring teeth instead of routine checks.

“I love my wifey” – the torturer next door

So who is Ilya Sorokin, aka Doctor Evil, when he’s not torturing prisoners? Schemes found years of social media posts. A 34-year-old from Potma village. Married with two daughters. Salary: 680,000 rubles ($8600) annually by 2021.

His posts show a typical provincial Russian. Sorokin participated in May 9 military parades wearing Soviet-era uniforms, visited the Crimean Bridge shortly after its opening in 2018, and posted messages supporting Russia’s military with Z-symbolism.

Professional pride also runs through his online presence. He celebrates Medical Worker Day. Posts comedy skits with nurses. Receives awards as “best paramedic” for “conscientious fulfillment of civic duties.”

This ordinariness reflects what philosopher Hannah Arendt called “the banality of evil” in her study of Nazi official Adolf Eichmann — how perpetrators of systematic atrocities often appear as “terrifyingly normal” bureaucrats rather than obvious fanatics.

Sorokin fits perfectly. An enthusiastic joiner of committees and trade unions. Amateur performer at workplace parties. Devoted family man “I love and adore my wifey!” he writes on his Vkontake page.

Who becomes a torturer? Sometimes, just ordinary people given permission.

Sorokin denies accusations

When Schemes reporters contacted Sorokin directly, the conversation lasted only moments.

“Ukrainian servicemen returning from captivity in Russia, who were held at Penal Colony No. 10, identify you as the person who tortured and beat them,” the journalist stated.

“That can’t be true. I don’t work there,” Sorokin replied before hanging up. He blocked the number after two additional contact attempts.

The Federal Penitentiary Service and Colony No. 10 administration did not respond to requests for comment.

Orders from above: systematic cruelty in Russian prisons

The reporters found that the abuse at Colony No. 10 was not the result of individual initiative but part of coordinated policy. Former prisoners reported that guards explicitly stated they were following orders.

“This is all from their initiative. The ‘guards’ said this repeatedly. Like, we didn’t invent the regime. But it’s an instruction,” one prisoner testified.

Earlier, The Wall Street Journal also reported that elite prison guards received orders that “normal rules” would not apply to Ukrainian prisoners of war, with these guards then circulated to prisons across Russia.

Russian prisons were known for harsh conditions and abuse of their own citizens even before 2022. However, the systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war represents an escalation of these practices under official sanction.

As prisoner rights advocate Olga Romanova noted, prison doctors in Russia become “Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia (FSIN) staff first, and doctors second,” reporting to military rather than medical leadership. This structure enabled medical professionals like Sorokin to abandon their healing mission in favor of systematic torture.

The case of “Doctor Evil” demonstrates how ordinary individuals can become instruments of state-sponsored war crimes when institutional structures provide both permission and protection for such behavior.

Not surprisingly, Sorokin recently joined the Russian army as a company medical instructor. His call sign? “Doctor.” Without the “evil” part.

However, his old job waits for him when the war ends.

How many more “ordinary” people are committing war crimes while planning their return to normal life? The investigation into Colony No. 10 suggests this case isn’t unique—it’s systematic.

Healing after hell: Ukraine opens mental facility for torture survivors

The scale of documented abuse led Ukraine to establish its first mental health facility dedicated specifically to released POWs and torture survivors.

The Saint Leo the Great Mental Health Center opened in Lviv on 24 June, designed to serve approximately 1,000 patients annually. The facility includes 30 beds, individual and group therapy spaces, and art therapy workshops. Patient rooms resemble residential spaces rather than hospital environments—a deliberate choice for people who’ve endured institutional abuse.

The center targets individuals returning from captivity, those recovering from losses, and people managing trauma from wartime experiences. For survivors like those from Colony No. 10, healing means confronting not just physical wounds but the systematic degradation designed to destroy their humanity.

Some carry permanent reminders. Others, like the former prisoners who spoke to Schemes, work to expose their tormentors. All face the long process of rebuilding their psychological health after systematic efforts to break their spirits.

Three Czech citizens who publicly questioned media coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian war and supported Russia’s position have traveled to eastern Ukraine as part of a documentary film project that aimed at showing them the reality of Russian aggression.

The participants, two men and one woman, had previously dismissed the war as a “special operation” and promoted conspiracy theories about media collusion, according to Gromada.

One participant stated at the beginning of the film’s trailer that “pointing a finger at Russia and saying it’s an aggressor and guilty is extraordinary stupidity.”

Another claimed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy “travels the world and begs for money so someone will finance his war.”

Director Robin Kvapil initiated the project by issuing a public call on social media for skeptics to witness the situation directly. The three volunteers agreed to travel from Prague to Kharkiv and cities in the Donbas region. Reality struck quickly—literally.

Psychiatrist was involved for support when seeing harsh realities of war

The group experienced rocket attacks during filming.

They interviewed wounded civilians in hospitals.

They walked through mass burial sites.

They descended into metro stations converted into underground schools where children study between air raid sirens.

The film crew documented the participants’ reactions throughout these encounters. The production included security analyst Petr Pojman, psychiatrist Petr Pjote, and translator Lucie Řehošíková, who previously directed the Czech Center in Kyiv.

Was the psychological support necessary? Given that participants had spent months believing the war was staged, witnessing actual destruction required professional guidance.

The filming also required coordination with both the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ukraine’s Security Service due to security concerns.

The Great Patriotic Trip premieres 21 August

The resulting documentary, “Velký vlastenecký výlet” (“The Great Patriotic Trip”), premieres 21 August. The title carries deliberate irony—borrowing Soviet-era language for a journey that challenges Russian propaganda narratives.

Can one trip change minds shaped by months of conspiracy theories? The film will reveal whether firsthand experience trumps social media disinformation.

However, the broader question remains: how many others refuse to believe what’s happening in Ukraine until they see destroyed buildings and grieving families themselves?

Donald Trump’s spiritual advisor Pastor Mark Burns followed a similar trajectory after visiting Bucha on 31 March. The former vocal Ukraine aid opponent called Putin “pure evil” following his tour of war crime sites.

Deeply affected by witnessing evidence of Russian atrocities, destruction of religious sites, and hearing testimonies from religious leaders, Burns called for increased military support for Ukraine and dismissed prior allegations that Ukraine restricts religious organizations.

He stressed that supporting Ukraine is a matter of humanitarian urgency above politics, highlighting Russian attacks on civilians and churches and urging fellow Republicans to reconsider their stance. 

Explore further

Trump’s spiritual advisor turns from Ukraine aid opponent to staunch supporter after seeing war impact

Keith Kellogg got an uncomfortable look at how Western sanctions on Russia are failing. During his visit to Kyiv, the US Special Representative to Ukraine examined Western-made electronics that Ukrainian intelligence pulled from destroyed Russian weapons—the same components fueling attacks on Ukrainian cities.

The exhibition was coordinated by the War&Sanctions portal of the Main Intelligence Directorate, working alongside the Defense Forces of Ukraine and the Kyiv Research Institute of Forensic Expertise. The display featured components extracted from destroyed or captured Russian weaponry by Ukrainian military intelligence personnel.

Among the items presented to Kellogg were Western elements found in Iranian-Russian Shahed kamikaze drones, also known as “geranium” drones, and Russian “gerbera” drones. These weapons systems have been consistently deployed against civilian targets in Ukraine.

But the problem runs deeper than drone components. Ukrainian analysts identified precision microelectronics critical for manufacturing high-accuracy weapons systems. Russia’s defense industry acquired these through what intelligence officials call “gray schemes”—unofficial networks designed to bypass sanctions.

“The international community must strengthen control over compliance with sanctions imposed on Moscow,” said Cipher, a Main Intelligence Directorate serviceman. “Manufacturers should take a more responsible approach to controlling their products in international markets.”

Head of Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence Kyrylo Budanov also warned Kellogg during their meeting in Kyiv that Russia’s war ambitions extend far beyond Ukraine and are projected to last until 2036, including preparations for a major conflict not only against Ukraine but also NATO. 

Earlier, President Zelenskyy highlighted a significant loophole in international sanctions that allows Russia to continue producing its nuclear-capable Oreshnik intercontinental ballistic missiles using Western technology. 

In 2024, Russia increasingly relied on North Korean KN-23 ballistic missiles to strike Ukraine, while analysis of missile fragments revealed that these weapons contain significant Western-made electronic components, primarily produced by companies from the US, the Netherlands, the UK, and Switzerland, some manufactured as recently as 2023.

These foreign parts include crucial guidance system circuitry without which the missiles could not function, highlighting that the missiles are reliant on imported Western technology despite sanctions.

Experts believe China acts as an intermediary in supplying these components to North Korea, raising concerns about loopholes in export controls and the illicit trade fueling Russian missile capabilities.

Seven months after an Azerbaijan Airlines plane crashed near Kazakhstan, killing 38 people, President Ilham Aliyev has had enough of Russia’s stonewalling.

Azerbaijan is preparing legal documents for international courts, targeting Russia over what Baku calls the deliberate downing of its civilian aircraft. The move escalates a diplomatic crisis that has simmered since 25 December, when flight J2-8243 was went down near Aktau.

Why the dramatic step? Russia’s investigation has produced nothing but bureaucratic delays, according to President Aliyev.

“Azerbaijan’s Prosecutor General keeps writing to Russia’s Investigative Committee,” Aliyev told reporters, as reported by AZERTAC. “The response is always the same: ‘the investigation continues.'”

But Azerbaijan isn’t buying it. “For us, everything is clear. We know what happened, and we can prove it. And we know that Russian officials also know what happened,” Aliyev said bluntly.

Russian air defense most likely led to plane crash

Flight J2-8243 left Baku bound for Grozny, Russia’s republic of Chechnya, that December morning. It never arrived.

Instead, after multiple course changes, the plane crashed hundreds of miles off course near Aktau, Kazakhstan, killing 38 people aboard.

Russian authorities quickly blamed bird strikes and bad weather—fog had closed Grozny airport, they said, forcing the reroute.

The explanation unraveled under scrutiny. Flight tracking data from Flightradar24 showed the plane’s GPS signal had been jammed near Grozny. More damaging: social media photos revealed puncture marks across the aircraft’s tail section that looked suspiciously like shrapnel damage.

OSINT analysts compared the damage patterns to known effects of Pantsir air defense missiles. The same morning, Grozny airport had implemented “Carpet” protocols—emergency closures during Ukrainian drone attacks.

Explore further

US confirms evidence Russia downed civilian Azeri plane that killed 38

Earlier, Azerbaijan’s President already stated that the aircraft was damaged by external fire, caused by electronic warfare systems that rendered the plane uncontrollable, and ground fire that severely damaged its tail. 

Aliyev emphasized that the plane was shot down accidentally by Russian air defenses responding to threats in the area, and he condemned the poor coordination and failure to close Russian airspace.

The Azerbaijani president also dismissed Russian explanations that a Ukrainian drone was responsible. “There were two attacks on the aircraft. So imagine: a Ukrainian drone flies in, targets the Azerbaijani aircraft, hits it, falls, and then attacks again. This is a kindergarten story,” he said.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov stated flatly that a Russian missile caused the crash, likely fired during anti-drone operations around Grozny.

Azerbaijan ready to wait for years to get justice

Baku has outlined four non-negotiable demands:

• Russia must admit responsibility
• punish those who fired the missile
• compensate victims’ families
• reimburse Azerbaijan Airlines for the lost aircraft.

Russia’s response? More delays.

Aliyev referenced the decade-long legal battle over Malaysian Airlines flight MH17, which Russia shot down over Ukraine in 2014.

“We are ready to wait ten years, but justice must prevail,” he said.

Only in 2025, after more than ten years, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued a historic ruling holding Russia responsible for the downing of MH17, recognizing Russia’s effective control over separatist territories.

Explore further

European court makes history: Russia guilty of Ukraine human rights violations since 2014 and plane downing MH17

In February 2025, Azerbaijan also officially expelled Rossotrudnichestvo, the main Kremlin propaganda and soft power agency, from its territory, citing the protection of national interests and refusal to tolerate external interference. Azerbaijani authorities took control of the agency’s headquarters in Baku, the so-called Russian House, after discovering it operated without proper registration.

Rossotrudnichestvo, known for orchestrating pro-Russian rallies and suspected intelligence activities, was seen as an instrument of Kremlin influence and disinformation.

Azerbaijan expressed growing tensions and openly criticized Russia, including suspending cultural events linked to Russia and detaining Russian journalists suspected of intelligence activities, so their relations have sharply deteriorated.

German Major General Christian Freuding urged Ukraine to develop more efficient air defense systems, warning that Russia aims to launch 2,000 drones simultaneously in future attacks.

So far, the largest single drone assault by Russia on Ukraine since the start of the full-scale invasion involved 728 Shahed-type and decoy drones, alongside 13 missiles, and occurred on 9 July.

Speaking on the Bundeswehr program “Nachgefragt,” General Freuding highlighted the economic disparity in current defense methods. The former chief military coordinator of German aid to Ukraine noted that using Patriot missiles costing over 5 million euros to intercept Shahed drones worth 30,000 to 50,000 euros represents an unsustainable approach.

“We must consider intelligent countermeasures,” Freuding stated, advocating for defensive systems priced between 2,000 and 4,000 euros per unit.

The general also suggested preemptive strikes targeting Russian aircraft, airfields, and military-industrial facilities as an alternative strategy. Ukraine has already demonstrated this approach works.

In response, Ukraine is rapidly accelerating the development and deployment of low-cost interceptor drones to counter increasingly frequent Russian drone attacks, especially the Iranian-designed Shahed kamikaze UAVs.

They’re capable of shooting down about 70% of incoming threats, nearly doubling the success rate of traditional mobile fire teams.

President Zelenskyy emphasized that while the technology is proven, Ukraine urgently needs international financial support to mass-produce and deploy these interceptors to defend against the escalating drone assaults.

In June, Ukraine received a significant $4 billion boost from the G7 summit to accelerate the mass production of these advanced drone interceptors. Four Ukrainian companies are engaged in developing these interceptors, two showing notable success, with large-scale production agreements secured with Germany and Canada. 

The top Ukrainian UAV commander Robert Brovdi (aka Madiar) stated earlier that the war with Russia will continue beyond 2025, as Russian forces still send more infantry than Ukraine can destroy, while Ukraine faces shortages in mobilization resources and numerical inferiority.

He emphasized that “everyone who wanted to fight is already fighting,” so Ukraine’s strategy is shifting towards replacing infantry with unmanned ground-based drones and constructing a massive, multi-layered “drone wall” to intercept incoming Russian attacks. His Drone Line project aims to create a 10-15 kilometer “kill zone” to prevent enemy advances and includes boosting domestic production of drone munitions.

On the night of 20 July, drones targeted multiple Russian regions, including Moscow, in what officials described as the most significant drone assault on the capital since early May.

Russian air defenses shot down 19 drones over the Moscow Oblast during the overnight assault, with debris igniting vehicles and striking the upper floors of a residential building in the suburb of Zelenograd, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense.

In total, 98 Ukrainian drones were intercepted across eight regions during the 20 July attack.

According to Russian news agency Agentstvo, Telegram channels linked to Russian security forces shared video footage of the burning cars and building damage. However, it remains unclear where the drones were heading exactly before their fragments hit civilian areas.

“There were no serious damages or casualties,” Moscow Mayor Sobyanin stated, according to reports from Russian media outlets.

However, the attack significantly disrupted air traffic across the region, with authorities implementing flight restrictions at four major airports: Domodedovo, Sheremetyevo, Vnukovo and Zhukovsky. Additional restrictions affected airports in Yaroslavl, Nizhny Novgorod and Kaluga. Russian aviation authority Rosaviatsia reported that 134 flights were diverted to alternative airfields due to these safety measures.

According to Russian Telegram channel Astra, passenger crowds formed at Sheremetyevo airport, though Rosaviatsia’s press service disputed claims of significant passenger accumulations at Vnukovo airport.

This marks the ninth day Moscow has faced drone attacks since early July, representing a significant escalation in Ukraine’s aerial campaign against the Russian capital.

Meanwhile, Russian forces launched widespread drone attacks across several Ukrainian regions on the night of 20 July, using 57 Shahed drones and decoy aircraft, resulting in at least one civilian death and several injuries while causing extensive damage to residential areas.

The deadliest incidents occurred in Sumy Oblast, where a 78-year-old woman died and three homes were destroyed, and rescue efforts were hampered by follow-up Russian strikes targeting first responders.

Russian forces conducted widespread drone attacks across multiple Ukrainian regions overnight on 20 July, killing at least one person and injuring several others while causing significant damage to residential areas.

The assault involved 57 Shahed strike drones and decoy aircraft, representing a relatively modest scale compared to Russia’s typical mass drone attacks, which often involve hundreds of aircraft and have reached over 700 drones in a single night.

According to the Air Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ukrainian air defenses successfully intercepted 18 of the attacking drones, while electronic warfare systems suppressed or caused the loss of seven additional aircraft. The military reported that 32 drones struck targets across 10 locations, with debris from intercepted aircraft falling in six areas. 

Russian strike kills one civilian, destroys three homes

The deadliest impact occurred in northeastern Sumy Oblast near the front line, where a 78-year-old woman was killed during a Russian drone attack on residential areas in Svesa community, according to the State Emergency Service. Four strike drones targeted a village, causing three residential buildings to ignite immediately upon impact.

Rescue operations faced significant delays because Russian forces conducted follow-up strikes on the same locations where emergency workers needed to operate. Despite the dangerous circumstances and intense fire conditions, emergency personnel successfully extinguished all blazes and prevented the fire from reaching two nearby residential buildings.

Residential areas sustain damage

Southern Zaporizhzhia and surrounding areas faced intensive attacks involving at least 14 strike drones and two multiple rocket launcher system strikes, according to Regional Military Administration head Ivan Fedorov. The bombardment damaged seven private residences and caused window and facade damage to apartment buildings, while also sparking multiple fires. A 69-year-old woman sustained injuries in the attacks.

The nearby settlement of Prymorske also came under assault, where a Russian drone directly struck a residential building, injuring two elderly women aged 64 and 73.

Father and daughter injured

In southern Kherson Oblast, Russian forces targeted the settlement of Zymivnyk, resulting in injuries to a 17-year-old girl and her 51-year-old father, both of whom required hospitalization, according to Regional Military Administration head Oleksandr Prokudin.

“As a result of the enemy attack, the 17-year-old girl sustained explosive and traumatic brain injuries, concussion, and shrapnel wounds to the shin. The 51-year-old man sustained explosive trauma, thermal burns to the chest and poisoning from combustion products,” Prokudin reported. Both victims are receiving medical treatment at local hospitals.