The Supreme Court has said the Federal Reserve Board’s independence warrants protection. President Trump’s effort to fire a member will test that commitment.

© Haiyun Jiang /The New York Times

The Supreme Court has indicated that there are distinctive reasons to shield the Federal Reserve from political interference.

© Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The court’s order was fractured, with the justices splitting over whether individual cancellations and the policy behind them could be challenged in a federal trial court.

© Michael A. McCoy for The New York Times

Rubio, a son of immigrants and now secretary of state, was responding to a 2016 lawsuit questioning his eligibility for the presidency.

© Eric Lee/The New York Times

A trade group representing sites like Facebook and X said the law ran afoul of the First Amendment.

© Eric Lee for The New York Times

Adam Liptak, a New York Times reporter covering the Supreme Court, explains a recent decision by the court on gerrymandering. He spells out how the justices may be poised to eliminate the remaining pillar of the Voting Rights Act.

The justices, having effectively blessed partisan gerrymandering, may be poised to eliminate the remaining pillar of the Voting Rights Act.

© Associated Press