Learning Resources and hand2mind, the toy companies suing the administration, argued that the law President Trump relied on, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, does not authorize tariffs.
The question for the justices is whether the centers may pursue a First Amendment challenge to a state subpoena seeking donor information in federal court.
The question for the justices is whether the centers may pursue a First Amendment challenge to a state subpoena seeking donor information in federal court.
The precise question the Supreme Court agreed to hear in the case involving First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, which runs five centers that say they “offer free medical services and material support to women facing unplanned pregnancies,” is a narrow one.
The handful of notable firms that were targeted by the president for punishment but chose to fight have uniformly won. Nine others have nonetheless pledged almost $1 billion in free legal work.
The handful of notable firms that were targeted by the president for punishment but chose to fight have uniformly won. Nine others have nonetheless pledged almost $1 billion in free legal work.
Several law firms chose to capitulate to President Trump’s demands in the face of threats to lift security clearances, cancel contracts and bar entry to government buildings.
The Trump administration said the Department of Government Efficiency, formed by Elon Musk, needed sensitive records of the Social Security Administration to root out waste and fraud and to modernize the agency’s operations.
The justices rejected an appeals court’s requirement that members of majority groups meet a heightened standard to win employment discrimination cases.
The justices rejected an appeals court’s requirement that members of majority groups meet a heightened standard to win employment discrimination cases.
The justices rejected an appeals court’s requirement that members of majority groups meet a heightened standard to win employment discrimination cases.
The justices rejected an appeals court’s requirement that members of majority groups meet a heightened standard to win employment discrimination cases.
Connexion
