Vue lecture

Trump Says U.S. Military Attacked a Third Suspected Drug Boat, Killing Three

It was the third time this month that the president said the United States had struck a vessel in the Caribbean Sea.

© Kenny Holston/The New York Times

President Trump boarding Marine One this week. On Friday, the president announced another American attack on a boat in the Caribbean Sea that he said was “trafficking illicit narcotics.” He also posted a one-minute surveillance video showing a speedboat being blown up.
  •  

Draft Bill Would Authorize Trump to Kill People He Deems Narco-Terrorists

Potential legislation circulating in the executive branch and Congress would grant President Trump sweeping military powers.

© Kenny Holston/The New York Times

President Trump has claimed that the Constitution gave him the power he needed to authorize deadly strikes against boats in the Caribbean this month.
  •  

Can Trump Actually Designate Antifa a Terrorist Group? Here Are the Facts.

The president made the same declaration in 2020, but nothing came of it. His new declaration came amid broader threats against liberals after the Charlie Kirk killing.

© Kenny Holston/The New York Times

Major factual and legal challenges complicate President Trump’s plans to designate the antifa movement a terrorist group.
  •  

U.S. Strikes a 2nd Venezuela Boat, Killing 3, Trump Says

The president said the vessel was heading to the United States, but he did not offer details about its location. Legal specialists condemned the action as illegal.

© Eric Lee for The New York Times

President Trump said that the strike on Monday occurred in international waters and that the boat was heading to the United States.
  •  

Venezuelan Boat Suspected of Drug Smuggling Is Said to Have Turned Before U.S. Strike

The Trump administration has argued that the summary killing of 11 people it accused of running drugs was legal under the laws of war.

© Anna Rose Layden for The New York Times

The White House argument that using military force was permissible under the laws of armed conflict has raised questions from many legal specialists, including retired top military lawyers.
  •  

The Supreme Court Decision on ICE and Racial Profiling, Explained

The ruling allowed immigration agents to stop people for reasons that lower courts had deemed likely unconstitutional.

© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

Civil rights organizations and several U.S. citizens accused federal agents of engaging in “blatant racial profiling” by carrying out “indiscriminate immigration operations” with no individualized basis for suspicion.
  •