Ukraine's energy ministry reported that Russia fired more than 150 missiles and over 2,000 drones at the country's power system during October and early November.
Russia escalates freeze-out campaign as temperatures drop
As winter approaches, Russia has intensified attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure, mirroring tactics from previous years aimed at causing blackouts and disrupting daily life. The strikes focus on critical nodes in the grid, aiming to strain repair crews and threaten civilian safety.
The ministry said that Russia targeted power generation sites, transmission lines, distribution networks, and gas infrastructure.
Ukrainian energy infrastructure damaged after a Russian attack. Screenshot from video: Ukrainian Ministry of Energy
Recent attacks force nationwide blackouts and kill energy workers
The October-November assault represents Russia's fourth consecutive winter targeting Ukraine's power system.
Among the major strikes: on 8 November, Russian forces launched over 450 drones and 45 missiles, forcing all three Centrenergo thermal plants offline and leaving Kyiv residents without electricity for up to 12 hours.
Strikes on 2 November plunged the entire Ukraine-controlled part of Donetsk Oblast into a full blackout, while other attacks have killed energy workers using double-strike tactics - hitting infrastructure sites, then attacking again as repair workers arrive.
Earlier strikes in October destroyed 60% of Ukraine's gas production capacity, forcing Ukraine to import gas at emergency winter prices and spend nearly €2 billion to maintain heating for 12 million Ukrainians.
Ukrainian energy infrastructure damaged after a Russian attack. Screenshot from video: Ukrainian Ministry of Energy
Rolling blackouts persist despite heroic repair efforts
The ministry expressed gratitude to energy workers and highlighted newly installed anti-drone shelters at key facilities and international support in limiting damage.
Yet, Ukraine continues to experience severe rolling blackouts across the country. Some regions face power cuts for up to 12 hours daily as Russian strikes outpace repair work.
Energy workers operate around the clock under dangerous conditions, racing to prevent complete grid collapse.
"Compared to the first attacks in 2022, we're now like ants: we run in, everyone takes their task," said Oleh, a master technician repairing transformer equipment, in a ministry video.
Repair workers at a Ukrainian energy site damaged after a Russian attack. Screenshot from video: Ukrainian Ministry of Energy
The workers' coordination has improved dramatically since 2022. But improved efficiency can't overcome the math: when Russia fires 2,000 drones and 150 missiles in six weeks, repair crews struggle to keep pace.
"It often happens: we just got home and immediately need to leave again to fix an emergency," added Ivan, head of the overhead line repair section at the facility featured in the video.
The accumulated experience from years of war allows crews to work faster, but the exhaustion is mounting, the blackouts continue, and winter has not even begun.
Operation Midas revealed a systemic management failure at Energoatom, one of Ukraine’s largest state companies. But things can get much, much worse.
How the government responds will determine if this scandal only affects the nuclear operator, or every other state company, destroying years of hard-won reforms that tried to lift Ukraine out of its Soviet past. For now, the government is not off to a great start.
Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko announced three decisions after news of the corruption scandal broke:
Energoatom’s supervisory board was fired without following the legal framework
The Ministry of Economy was told to find new board members in just a week
An urgent audit of Energoatom was launched
However, it later emerged that another decision was adopted on the same day, without being announced — effectively nullifying independent performance evaluation for supervisory boards of all strategic state-owned enterprises (SOEs), not just Energoatom.
These steps, in combination, raise serious concerns that a reform rollback is possible. If that happens, it can lead to more political meddling at SOEs, paving the way for a new wave of systemic scandals in the future.
This can weaken the greatest pillars of Ukraine’s economy during a time of war, compromise the country’s future recovery, erode its integration into the EU, and make it more like Russia, something that thousands of volunteers fought tooth and nail to prevent.
Corporate governance reform is meant to fix Ukraine’s post-Soviet dysfunction
Energoatom runs the nuclear plants and is responsible for more than half of the country’s power generation.
Like other strategic SOEs, Energoatom went through corporate governance reform in 2023 and 2024, to establish efficiency and transparency. Part of this reform involved creating a supervisory board — the first one Energoatom had in history.
This was supposed to break Ukraine's Soviet legacy of state enterprises where ministers acted as owner, manager, and controller simultaneously — a system where only 15% of Ukraine's 3,100 state enterprises turned a profit, while the rest accumulated $16.7 billion in debt between 2018 and 2023.
The 2024 reform, a prerequisite for EU membership and IMF funding, aimed to replace political appointments and extraction schemes with independent boards selected through transparent competition. It was meant to finally complete what reformers started in 2014.
The failures of Energoatom’s supervisory board
For Energoatom, proving Ukraine could manage strategic assets to OECD standards is essential for attracting the billions in reconstruction investment the country desperately needs.
In theory, the system should work as follows: the state sets strategic goals and appoints a supervisory board to ensure their implementation. The board hires and oversees management. The state then evaluates whether the board has fulfilled its mandate.
In practice, however, the board’s independence was compromised from the start.
Despite official statements denying political interference, real events suggested otherwise. A six-month delay in signing contracts with newly elected board members — which prevented the board from starting its work — led to the resignation of independent member Timothy Stone.
As a result, the supervisory board never obtained the legally required majority of independent members. And it subsequently failed in its responsibilities:
Controlling management activities: Regular reporting, risk assessment, and personnel decisions are basic tools the board should have applied.
Establishing an effective internal control system: Compliance, risk management, and internal audit mechanisms at Energoatom proved ineffective. For example, if the whistleblowing mechanism had functioned properly, the so-called “bar gate scheme,” in which officials stole $100M of state money through kickbacks, could likely have been detected much earlier.
Ensuring transparency: The suspension of financial and non-financial reporting during wartime — although justified as protection from external threats — effectively facilitated internal abuse by corrupt officials.
Members of supervisory boards at SOEs must fully understand their fiduciary duties.
If a board cannot explain what it has done over the past year to prevent or detect corruption schemes in a company long associated with scandals — and provides only vague general statements — this indicates a lack of due care.
As such, the Ministry of Economy’s position that the supervisory board “was not involved” in the actions under investigation seems unclear. While board members were not beneficiaries or perpetrators of the corrupt schemes, their core responsibility was precisely to ensure such schemes could not occur.
Even more contradictory is the Ministry’s claim that this board “helped establish modern corporate governance processes.” If large-scale corruption was allowed to flourish, it is difficult to describe the system as modern or effective.
A comparison with the banking sector is instructive: managers and board members whose banks collapse lose their impeccable business reputation and are barred from similar positions. At Energoatom, however, the board under whose watch corruption thrived was essentially thanked for “building modern corporate governance.”
Throwing the baby out with the bathwater
One of the government’s first reactions to the scandal was to prematurely terminate the powers of this board.
At first glance, this may seem logical: the board is the key element of the corporate governance system and is accountable to the state as the owner.
However, the way the government went about it — firing from the hip while ignoring legal procedures —may suggest that it’s more interested in sweeping the problem under the rug than solving it.
1. The premature dismissal of the board
The Law On the Management of State Property Objects contains an exhaustive list of grounds for early dismissal of supervisory board members.
Nothing on that list says you can fire the board based on a subjective assessment of ineffectiveness.
The decision must rely on a formalized performance evaluation. Since no proper evaluation was conducted, the government likely lacked legal grounds for the dismissal.
Even the government’s amendments adopted on 11 November, allowing evaluations to be conducted solely by Energoatom’s owner (the Cabinet of Ministers through the Ministry of Economy) — without independent consultants — do not eliminate the requirement to actually perform the evaluation.
Under the legally-mandated procedure:
All board members must complete questionnaires
Company data must be analyzed
Each element within the scope of evaluation must be given a score
An action plan to fill identified gaps must be prepared
Board members must be allowed to give their explanations
None of this could reasonably have been completed in a single day. The absence of a published evaluation report, which is explicitly required by law, further indicates that the evaluation did not take place.
If this violation of a core reform safeguard is ignored, protection of SOE supervisory boards from political interference will collapse. If Energoatom’s board can be dismissed in this manner, any SOE board could be dismissed next, regardless of objective justification.
2. Appointment of a new supervisory board in one week
The Ministry of Economy stated that, in coordination with G7 partners, it would propose a new board composition within a week.
However, the procedures established by law and Cabinet resolutions 142, 143, and 777 require:
a formal decision to launch the selection;
competitive selection of a recruiter;
publication of candidate requirements;
acceptance and evaluation of applications;
shortlisting by a nomination committee;
Cabinet approval.
This process typically takes at least three months. Completing it in seven days is not realistic under current rules.
Some stages may be accelerated in exceptional circumstances, but bypassing transparency and competition is not flexibility — it is regression. Transparent, merit-based selection is a cornerstone of sound corporate governance. Any informal or opaque approach will further erode trust.
The inconsistency is striking: the government can amend resolutions overnight when it seeks to weaken transparency (as with the evaluation procedure), yet has failed for months to approve reforms aimed at strengthening selection rules — despite these being legal obligations and long-overdue IMF benchmarks.
This explains why official claims of “commitment to reform” now face skepticism.
3. Dismantling the supervisory board performance evaluation mechanism
A key win of the 2024 reform was the introduction of regular performance evaluations of SOE supervisory boards. The law required the Cabinet to define procedures and specify cases where an independent consultant is mandatory.
The core principle was clear: board effectiveness must be assessed based on objective evaluation, not political judgment.
However, on 11 November, the government decided that, during martial law, evaluations will be conducted solely by the ministry that owns the SOE.
This enables ministries to unilaterally determine supervisory board effectiveness without independent oversight.
This marks a return to direct state control over these companies. Any supervisory board can now be dismissed at a ministry’s discretion — a practice common before the 2024 reform.
Also, the legality of the amendment is highly questionable. The 2024 reform law clearly defines the list of exceptions allowed during martial law — and none of them involve evaluating a supervisory board’s performance.
Reform on the brink
Corporate governance cannot be strengthened by methods that undermine its core principles: procedural integrity, transparency, and independence.
Operation Midas demonstrated that Ukraine still operates within a framework of simulated corporate governance.
The reform will become real only when:
Supervisory boards are held personally accountable for their actions and inaction;
Transparency and accountability of SOEs and managerial decisions are ensured;
The government refrains from political interference in corporate processes.
Violating established rules in pursuit of a “quick result” is not reform — it is dismantlement. Unless these decisions are reversed, Operation Midas will be only the first in many similar scandals to come.
Oleksandr Lysenko is an independent corporate governance and legal consultant, who co-authored the 2024 corporate governance reform for Ukraine's state-owned enterprises.
Ukraine has begun serial production of its new Octopus interceptor drone designed to take down Russia’s Shahed-type attack UAVs, Ukrainian Minister of Defense Denys Shmyhal announced on Friday. The technology has been handed to three manufacturers, with another eleven preparing production lines.
Shaheds are Iranian kamikaze drones regularly used by Russia to strike Ukrainian cities, industry, and energy facilities. They are often launched in large groups to strain air defenses and cause maximum damage. Ukraine has pushed to expand its own interception capabilities as these drones continue to hit civilian areas and critical infrastructure across the country.
Ukrainian-developed Octopus system confirmed in combat conditions
Shmyhal said Octopus is a Ukrainian-developed system created by the Armed Forces and confirmed in combat. It can operate at night, under electronic jamming, and at low altitude - conditions that often make Shahed attacks difficult to counter with standard air defense assets.
He said the launch of mass production will accelerate the deployment of interceptors “so they can begin protecting Ukraine’s skies as soon as possible.”
He added that the Defense Ministry is continuing to cooperate with domestic drone manufacturers to move new designs quickly from innovation to regular frontline use.
Eight Baltic and Nordic countries announced a joint $500 million weapons and munitions military aid package for Ukraine on 13 November.
The package is designed to strengthen Ukraine’s defence capabilities ahead of winter, as Russia intensifies strikes on civilian and energy infrastructure. It will supply critical weapons and ammunition sourced from the United States through NATO’s Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative.
Eight northern allies declare "Ukraine's security is directly connected to ours"
The countries involved - Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, and Sweden - confirmed the package during the Nordic-Baltic Eight (NB8) Defence Ministers’ meeting in Helsinki.
In a joint statement, they reaffirmed their commitment to Ukraine’s security, calling it “fundamental to European security” and emphasizing the need for long-term, coordinated military support.
The statement said the package is one of many ways the NB8 supports Ukraine’s ability to deter future Russian aggression. “We will not allow [Russia’s war of aggression] to succeed. Ukraine’s security is directly connected to ours,” the ministers said.
Finland, Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden announced today that they will fund a USD 500 million package of defence materiel for Ukraine sourced from the United States.
How NATO's PURL initiative pools allied funds for urgent Ukraine weapons deliveries
The Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) allows NATO allies to pool funds to purchase US-supplied weapons, munitions, and military equipment for Ukraine.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte welcomed the announcement: “This equipment is extremely important as Ukraine enters the winter months, and deliveries through PURL are flowing into Ukraine. NATO Allies will continue to deliver essential equipment and supplies.”
The aid package will provide high-priority military equipment such as missiles, precision weapons, air defence systems, long-range artillery shells, HIMARS rockets, and guided aerial bombs.
Norway’s Defence Minister Tore O. Sandvik noted that PURL ensures Ukraine receives urgent equipment quickly, and Sweden highlighted the package’s contribution to strengthening Ukraine’s air-defence capabilities.
Norway leads with $200M, Lithuania commits funds through 2026
Norway is contributing the largest share at roughly NOK 2 billion (~$200 million), Sweden $60 million, Denmark around 400 million Danish kroner (~$53 million), and Lithuania $30 million.
Lithuania also earmarked funds for next year and stressed the importance of using frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine’s defence spending.
Beyond weapons: Nordic-Baltic Eight expands brigade training in Poland
The NB8 meeting also addressed broader initiatives, including training Ukrainian brigades in collaboration with Baltic, Nordic, and Polish forces. Lithuania will contribute €12 million worth of equipment, ammunition, grenades, and a mobile training team to the OP-LEGIO Training Centre in Poland.
Ministers emphasized that Russia’s aggression poses a long-term threat to European security, the transatlantic community, and the rules-based international order.
Estonia’s Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said maintaining support for Ukraine will remain central to the NB8’s agenda during Estonia’s presidency next year.
An escalating corruption scandal at Ukraine's state nuclear operator Energoatom and the ongoing prosecution of former Ukrenergo chief Volodymyr Kudrytskyi are converging into a crisis that threatens Ukraine's ability to weather Russian attacks on its grid.
With Kyiv residents now enduring blackouts lasting 12 to 16 hours, the political turmoil has exposed gaping holes in protection for key energy sites—failures that current and former officials attribute to corruption and political interference, rather than Russian firepower alone.
The political crisis triggered a cascade: Western donors withdrew, protective construction stalled at critical energy facilities, and Ukraine's most vulnerable infrastructure faced Russian strikes without proper defenses.
Why this matters
A Russian strike destroyed a Ukrainian power plant in March 2024 along with the control panel. Photo: DTEK via X/Twitter
The combined effect of corruption and political persecution deepened Ukraine's energy crisis by shutting down the main channel of Western financial support. International aid through Ukrenergo dropped to just 5-10% of previous levels after Kudrytskyi's September 2024 dismissal—from €1.5 billion over 18 months to a trickle.
Meanwhile, zero protective shelters were built for transformers at Energoatom, thermal power plants, and regional energy companies until autumn 2024, despite Ukrenergo completing approximately 60 such structures at its own facilities by September.
Oleksandr Kharchenko, director of the Energy Industry Research Center, told Suspilne that this loss of international backing is directly responsible for the severity of current blackouts—a consequence of institutional breakdown rather than Russian missiles alone.
When protection worked—and when it didn't
Volodymyr Kudrytskyi, then-head of Ukraine’s energy company Ukrenergo, and Christian Laibach, a member of the Executive Board of German KfW development bank, in June 2024. Source: Volodymyr Kudrytskyi Facebook
The protection systems built at Ukrenergo, Ukraine's national electricity transmission system operator, and Energoatom, Ukraine’s nuclear operator, tell a tale of two radically different management systems.
Under Kudrytskyi's leadership, Ukrenergo partnered with the government's Agency for Restoration and Development of Infrastructure to construct approximately 60 anti-drone shelters for critical transformers by September 2024. These massive concrete structures—up to 25 meters tall—were designed specifically to withstand mass Iranian Shahed drone strikes.
The effectiveness proved remarkable. According to the Verkhovna Rada's temporary investigative commission cited by Kharchenko, out of 74 protected objects built by Ukrenergo and the Agency, only one autotransformer was destroyed by a direct hit from a heavy missile. The rest survived repeated attacks.
Kudrytskyi explained to Espreso that Ukrenergo secured several billion euros in aid—significantly more than Ukraine's entire Energy Ministry obtained. Western partners trusted the company's management and saw results. Between 2020 and 2024, Ukrenergo attracted $1.5 billion in grants and loans, becoming the second-largest recipient of international aid in Ukraine after the state itself.
But outside Ukrenergo's network, the picture was bleak. At the time of Kudrytskyi's dismissal in September 2024, zero protective shelters had been built for transformers at non-Ukrenergo sites—including Energoatom facilities, thermal power plants, and regional energy companies, according to Kudrytskyi in his interview with the BBC.
Kharchenko confirmed that Energoatom didn't even begin tendering for protective construction until late summer or early autumn 2024. The unprotected Energoatom substations and open switchgears became priority targets, he explained, and current blackouts stem directly from this failure to protect key generation facilities.
The delayed protection had a simple reason, Kharchenko suggested: some officials questioned whether such expensive fortifications were necessary at all.
The $100 million corruption scheme
Tymur Mindich, Zelenskyy's partner in the Kvartal95 comedy club, is accused of orchestrating a scheme that stole $100M of Energoatom state funds on kickbacks. Photo: djc.com.ua
On 10 November 2025, Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau unveiled Operation Midas—a 15-month investigation documenting systematic corruption at Energoatom. Over 1,000 hours of surveillance recordings captured contractors openly discussing "Shlagbaum" (bar gate)—slang for the 10-15% kickbacks demanded from anyone wanting to work with the nuclear operator.
The scheme operated from a Kyiv office tied to Andrii Derkach, a former Ukrainian MP whom the US Treasury sanctioned in 2020 as "an active Russian agent" for election interference, and who now serves as a Russian senator.
Investigators identified businessman Tymur Mindich—President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's former comedy studio partner—as "Carlson," coordinating the money-laundering network.
Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko, who previously served as Energy Minister, appeared in recordings under the codename "Professor."
Mindich crossed Ukraine's border at 02:09 on 10 November—hours before NABU detectives arrived at his residence, raising immediate questions about information leaks. He's now believed to be hiding in Israel or Austria.
When asked about the $100 million NABU alleges was stolen through the Energoatom kickback scheme, Kharchenko was skeptical: "100 million—this is, well, maybe, 10%." The implication: the full corruption scale could reach $1 billion.
Explore further
Zelenskyy tried to kill NABU. Then it exposed his friend’s $100M scheme.
Political prosecution and collapsing Western trust
Volodymyr Kudrytskyi in court, 29 October 2025. Photo: Suspilne
Between 2020 and 2024, Ukrenergo chief Kudrytskyi secured $1.5 billion for Ukrenergo from Western partners—triple what Ukraine’s entire Energy Ministry obtained. He ensured shelters were built from donor funds: "We didn't spend a single budget kopeck on those shelters that Ukrenergo built," he told Espreso.
He was dismissed in September 2024—and the money flow stopped. Western partners noticed: Two Western board members—Daniel Dobbeni and Peder Andreasen—quit Ukrenergo, calling the firing "politically motivated."
The dismissal triggered a financial crisis. While talking to Suspilne, Kharchenko explained that Ukrenergo failed to restructure its Eurobonds in coordination with Ukraine's sovereign debt restructuring, pushing the company into technical default. International lenders won't provide new credits to an entity in default, and grant-makers grew cautious.
This funding flow, built around trust for Kudrytskyi, collapsed. "When Kudrytskyi was dismissed, the main channel of Western support through Ukrenergo was effectively closed," Kharchenko explained. "We lost international support for Ukrainian energy. We've lost at least 80% of what we could have received."
The aid flow plummeted from €1.5 billion over 18 months to just 5-10% of previous capacity. Naftogaz now maintains Western trust with quality corporate governance, but can only support gas infrastructure—not the devastated electricity sector.
Kudrytskyi now faces fraud charges stemming from a 2018 fence reconstruction project. The case centers on bank guarantees that Ukrenergo properly collected when a contractor failed to complete work—a standard commercial transaction where the state suffered no losses.
Ukraine's Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko visits the Zmiivska thermal power plant, damaged in a Russian missile attack. Photo: DTEK
The charges materialized 14 months after his dismissal, following his public criticism of infrastructure protection failures by Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko—who was exposed in the Mindich tapes under the code name "Professor" within the criminal organization, according to information from the NABU investigation and reports from lawmakers.
For international donors—whether financial institutions or government aid agencies—trust and reputation of recipients matter fundamentally.
"When these donors see corruption scandals, or political interference in corporate governance, or political cases not backed by facts and made in half a day, this creates additional obstacles," Kudrytskyi told Espreso. "We don't have time to heroically overcome obstacles we create for ourselves."
Explore further
A tribute to blackout Kyiv: Top 15 photos
Information monopoly and presidential isolation
Kudrytskyi has been accused of failing to ensure energy security, despite having left his position 14 months earlier. The disconnect puzzled observers.
Kharchenko offered an explanation. He sees that people in Zelenskyy's circle are exclusively friendly to Halushchenko—the former Energy Minister now serving as Justice Minister. "Herman Valeriyovych knows how to communicate with people—I assure you, in person he's very pleasant, charismatic, professional, and convincing," Kharchenko said. Most people surrounding the president evidently receive information through one channel.
"I don't see the president, in the energy sphere, inviting people who broadcast any alternative thoughts and assessments, and listening to what's wrong," Kharchenko told Novyi Vidlik.
The monopolized information flow means alternative assessments of infrastructure failures and protection gaps never reach decision-makers. "When you have energy being attacked and negative things happening, and people around you point fingers at each other or say everything's fine, but it's evidently not fine—a manager in such a situation would invite an alternative viewpoint," Kharchenko said. "I don't observe this situation."
Ukraine energy crisis winter forecast: Attack, collapse, recover, repeat
Fire at a thermal power plant in Kharkiv Oblast after Russian missile strikes in spring 2024. Credit: BBC; Illustrative photo
Kharchenko predicted a predictable winter pattern: major Russian attack, followed by three to four days of severe disruption with 12-16-hour blackouts, then a gradual recovery until the next strike.
Three cities face the worst schedules: Kyiv, Odesa, and Kharkiv—massive consumption centers with insufficient internal generation. Kyiv and Odesa each face roughly one gigawatt power deficits. These cities will consistently endure the longest outages.
"I'm not an adherent of winter armageddon," Kudrytskyi told Espreso. "I don't think the energy system will collapse or there will be catastrophic consequences. We'll still survive the next winter. But of course, the question is the duration of outages and the degree of damage Russians can achieve to our facilities."
The strategic solution, both Kudrytskyi and Kharchenko emphasized, is accelerating distributed generation: replacing 15-20 large Soviet-era power plants vulnerable to missile strikes with hundreds of small gas, solar, and battery storage facilities scattered across Ukraine. Such a network would be exponentially harder for Russia to destroy and provide crucial regional resilience.
But distributed generation requires coordination, funding, and institutional trust—precisely what corruption and political persecution have destroyed.
The institutional breakdown
The failure wasn't technical or financial. In summer 2023, authorities identified several hundred critical infrastructure objects requiring protection—not just Ukrenergo substations, but power plants, gas infrastructure, and other essential facilities.
From summer 2023, Ukrenergo and the restoration agency built protection for Ukrenergo substations. But what happened at other facilities?
In his Espreso interview, Kudrytskyi posed the critical questions:
Why didn't the Energy Ministry coordinate protection for all other objects at the same time Ukrenergo was building shelters?
Why didn't it determine budget sources for such protection?
And if there were no budget funds, why didn't it approach donors who were ready to help Ukrainian energy?
The answer emerged in November 2025 surveillance recordings: some officials were too busy organizing kickback schemes to focus on infrastructure protection.
Anti-corruption lawyer Daria Kaleniuk wrote that persecution of government critics through fabricated criminal cases had become a trend. Western board members Daniel Dobbeni and Peder Andreasen quit Ukrenergo in September 2024, calling Kudrytskyi's dismissal "politically motivated."
Now Ukrainians endure 12-16 hour blackouts at the heart of this energy crisis—not because Russia attacks, though it does, but because institutions failed to build protection systems, maintain donor trust, or prioritize infrastructure over personal enrichment.
"Any effective action against corruption is very much needed," Zelenskyy said after the NABU raids. But the damage was done. The coordination failure between protection, prosecution, and politics left Ukraine's grid more vulnerable than Russian missiles alone could have achieved.
Trained in international relations, Maxim Volovich spent two decades as a diplomat and now covers regional and foreign policy issues as a journalist at Euromaidan Press.
A 6,600 km strike to sever Russia's North Korean lifeline
Ukrainian military intelligence (HUR) released a video showing what it says was a sabotage operation that disrupted freight traffic on the Trans-Siberian Railway in Russia’s Khabarovsk Krai.
The Trans-Siberian line moves military cargo across Russia, including weapons from abroad. HUR has carried out similar operations against rail lines, depots, and supply routes in recent months, aiming to slow Russian logistics far from the front.
According to HUR, an explosion hit the line near the village of Sosnovka, about 6,600km from Ukraine, on 13 November, halting cargo movement along a route used for transporting weapons and ammunition, including supplies from North Korea.
Sabotage proofs followed by a direct threat
HUR said the blast derailed a freight train and damaged the track. The agency described the operation as part of broader efforts to target Russian logistics.
The published video shows the placement of an explosive charge along the rail line and the controlled detonation.
Screenshot from HUR video with text: "Explosive devices were planted with controlled remote detonation."
HUR added that Russian security services failed to protect one of the country’s critical transport corridors and said such actions would continue.
Explosions were recorded in Novorossiysk overnight on 14 November as Ukrainian forces conducted a combined missile and drone strike on the Russian Black Sea port city, 300-400 km from the southern sections of the frontline in Ukraine. Fires were observed at an oil terminal and military installations, with video footage, satellite imagery, and local reports confirming multiple impact sites across the area.
The attack is part of Ukraine’s ongoing deep-strike campaign in the Russo-Ukrainian war. Kyiv employs drones and missiles to hit fuel facilities, defense plants, energy infrastructure, and military sites across Russia and occupied territories. Oil refineries, depots, and fuel transport infrastructure have been among the key targets, aiming to disrupt Moscow’s military fuel logistics and undermine oil export revenues that finance the war.
Ukrainian drones and missiles hit multiple targets in Novorossiysk
The attack began around midnight, with explosions reported in various districts of Novorossiysk in southern Russia's Krasnodar Krai.
Ukrainian Telegram channel Exilenova+ publishedmultiplevideosandimagesfrom the scene. In one of the videos, a woman is heard descibing an explosion she saw before starting to film the video and then reacting to a new sudden blast: “It lit up just like this.”
Eyewitness footage showed significant fires and rising smoke in multiple locations.
The site, a strategic end-point for Transneft’s pipeline network, lies 300–400 km from the frontline and plays a key role in Russia’s Black Sea oil exports. Exilenova+ pic.twitter.com/XFq2OmwYOH
Several videos captured Russian air defense launches, including one missile falling into the sea and another—or the same recorded from the opposite angle—illuminating the horizon.
Posting twoclips of a particularly large explosion, Exilenova+ first stated that the strike hit military unit 52522, likely at an ammunition depot, and identified the point of view's coordinates as 44.6714567471, 37.7787317922. An updated post said a suspected S-400 air defense system position was located behind a “Lenta” mall, seen in the clips. Open-source researchers from the Cyberboroshno community stated that S-300 or S-400 positions belonging to military unit 1537 of the Kuban anti-aircraft missile regiment were hit.
Not just the oil terminal: Another strike on Novorossiysk captured from two angles
Videos showed that during the air assault, fires broke out at Transneft's Chernomortransneft oil terminal in the Sheskharis area of Novorossiysk following the aerial attack. The site is a key point in the Transneft pipeline network. NASA’s FIRMS satellite system also recorded numerous fire outbreaks in the Novorossiysk area.
Due to the overnight attack, the airports in Krasnodar and Gelendzhik temporarily suspended operations.
Ukraine reveals new Neptune launcher platform
On 14 November, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy published a video showing a modified launcher for the “Long Neptune” cruise missile.
Ukraine launched its Long Neptune missiles at targets in Russia, Zelenskyy said
He didn't specify the exact targets, but last night's footage of a powerful explosion suggests that at least one Neptune has struck Russia's Novorosiysk. TG/Zelenskyy https://t.co/j6P01SKzNMpic.twitter.com/d3K4KZPJA6
Militarnyi notes that the system is mounted on a Tatra chassis and fitted with square transport-launch containers designed for two longer missiles. Zelenskyy said that Ukrainian forces used the Long Neptunes successfully overnight against designated targets in Russian territory.
The Ukrainian strikes came amid Russia's massive air and drone attack on Kyiv. Zelenskyy called the Ukrainian strike a “just response to continued Russian terror” and stated that Ukrainian missiles demonstrate growing accuracy and effectiveness each month.
Although Zelenskyy did not name specific strike locations, video footage of a large explosion in Novorossiysk suggests that at least one Long Neptune missile was used in the operation.
Russia issues official statements
Russia’s Ministry of Defense claimed that its air defense forces shot down 66 Ukrainian drones over Krasnodar Krai during the night.
The emergency task force of Krasnodar Krai acknowledged damage to the oil depot at the Sheskharis transshipment complex and a "civilian" ship in the port — possibly an oil tanker of Russia's "shadow fleet," used to circumvent G7's oil sanctions.
It also claimed that drone debris have fallen in several areas of the city.
Ukrainian forces launched a large drone strike on Russian positions in occupied Donetsk on Thursday evening, according to local Telegram channels.
Donetsk in eastern Ukraine has been under Russian occupation since 2014. The city hosts major industrial sites and remains one of the main rear areas supporting Russian forces in the east.
Residents reported the sound of dozens of drones around 8pm, followed by intense Russian anti-aircraft fire across several districts.
Videos show gun and machine-gun fire directed at low-flying targets, which Ukrainian defense portal Militarnyi says suggests earlier strikes may have disabled some Russian missile and radar systems.
Donetsk-based sources report a drone attack on the occupied city.
Footage from the scene includes the sound of drone engines, Russian anti-aircraft fire, an apparent strike, and what may be a fire at the Donetsk Metallurgical Plant. The full outcome of the attack remains… pic.twitter.com/94CksVPsDt
Footage from the scene captures the sound of drone engines, bursts of anti-aircraft fire, and at least one blast. A major fire was later visible at the Donetsk Metallurgical Plant, with several thick columns of smoke rising from the area.
Parts of the city lost power during the attack, pointing to possible damage to energy infrastructure. Witnesses said the drones arrived in waves and circled over the city for an extended period.
Militarnyi reports, based on the released clips, that the strike appears to have involved FP-2 kamikaze drones produced in Ukraine.
Today, there is important news from the Pokrovsk direction.
Here, Ukrainian units launched a massive wave of coordinated counterattacks along the entire Dobropillia frontline to block and cut off the Russian pincer above Myrnohrad. As the Russians were forced to quickly react to the unfolding developments, the Ukrainian command ordered to execute the most important move of the entire Pokrovsk operation.
Synchronized strikes eliminate Russian positions near Rodynske
Ukrainian units counterattacked near Dobropillia, combining airpower, tanks, and precision-guided munitions in a synchronized strike that put Russian positions in great danger.
The operation began when aerial reconnaissance detected Russian drone operators setting up in the territory of a local mine east of Rodynske. Within minutes, the coordinates were transmitted, and a Ukrainian Su-27 delivered a precise strike with a GBU-62 Jdam bomb, annihilating the launch site.
Moments later, Ukrainian surveillance drones spotted Russian troops attempting to fortify a building on the outskirts of Rodynske. Another airstrike followed, again using Jdam bomb, wiping out the infiltrators and several Russian officers who had been directing operations in that area.
Later, Ukrainian drones identified fresh groups of Russian soldiers attempting to regroup in another building inside Rodynske, but a Ukrainian tank opened fire on one structure, clearing it of enemy forces. Inside an industrial complex nearby, more Russians were spotted, so Ukrainian jets launched Jdam's again, with the first one missing slightly due to Russian electronic warfare interference, while the second flattened the site successfully.
These air strikes were part of a carefully planned prelude to the main ground counterattack aimed at securing Myrnohrad's northern flank and pushing Russian forces further away from encircling it.
Russian forces shift from offense to defense
Ukrainian forces used the momentum of the air strikes and ground units to simulate a massive assault launched from all sides, catching the attention of the Russian surveillance and forcing them to switch focus from offense to defense. The enemy abandoned temporarily attempts to reach the encircled units and instead focused on holding the line.
Textbook deception enables safe rotation and resupply
Later, it became evident that the Ukrainian counterattack was a well-orchestrated distraction. While the Russian command concentrated all attention on Dobropillia, convinced that the northern flank was the main target, Ukrainian commanders quietly executed a partial rotation of forces in Myrnohrad.
This operation enabled the secure evacuation of wounded personnel and the delivery of vital supplies and ammunition to those still defending the town. It was a textbook deception maneuver: create pressure on one sector, force the enemy to divert reserves, and use the gained window to reinforce or extract troops from another direction.
This first stage of the plan was completed with remarkable coordination. Ukrainian troops conducted the rotation and partial withdrawal from the semi-encircled town with no losses.
The counterattack to the north drew away Russian reconnaissance assets, allowing evacuation convoys to move through safely under electronic countermeasures. Part of the soldiers were safely extracted behind the frontlines, while the remaining defenders in Myrnohrad resupplied and prepared to hold the new line.
Coordinated defense maintains strategic viability of Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad
At the same time, this was not the only distraction for the Russians. While the Dobropillia counterattack tied down their reserves, they were also forced to maintain focus on Pokrovsk, where Ukrainian forces continue to hold the enemy south of the railway line by constant clearing operations against Russian infiltrators.
This persistent defense, the main objective of Ukraine's Pokrovsk operation, is working precisely as General Syrskyi planned. The ability to withdraw, rotate and evacuate forces from Myrnohrad would have been impossible if Pokrovsk had fallen or if Russian units had broken through north of the railway.
Ukrainian troops are thus not only defending two towns but coordinating between them in a way that keeps both strategically viable and linked through controlled logistics corridors.
Overall, the latest events around Dobropillia, Pokrovsk, and Myrnohrad reveal a multi-layered Ukrainian strategy to contain the Russian advance, transform Myrnohrad into a fortress, and force Russia into another slow, attritional fight that costs thousands of lives for minimal territorial gain.
The successful Dobropillia counterattack has already bought Ukraine precious time, destabilized Russian planning, and improved the security of the northern approaches.
If Ukraine continues to hold the railway in Pokrovsk and keeps Myrnohrad supplied, the Russians will face months of bloody stalemate, one that Ukraine will use to strengthen its new defensive lines behind the embattled towns.
In our regular frontline report, we pair up with the military blogger Reporting from Ukraine to keep you informed about what is happening on the battlefield in the Russo-Ukrainian war.
Russian forces continue to advance near Huliaipole and Velykomykhailivka, in the area where three regions—Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Dnipropetrovsk—meet. According to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), they are taking advantage of poor weather and months of targeted airstrikes to weaken Ukrainian defenses and limit drone surveillance.
This comes amid the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war, as Russia has focused its main offensive efforts near Pokrovsk in Donetsk Oblast. With Ukrainian reserves tied down there, Russia is attempting a secondary push further south.
ISW reiterated that recent Russian gains are partly the result of a prolonged battlefield air interdiction campaign targeting Ukrainian ground lines of communication in the Huliaipole and Velykomykhailivka areas. Roads, highways, and railway lines have been under sustained attack. In parallel, deteriorating weather — marked by rain and fog — has made Ukrainian drone reconnaissance far less effective.
Russia intensifies push near Hulyaipole and T‑0401 highway
ISW reported on 13 November that Russian troops continued to press toward Huliaipole in Zaporizhzhia Oblast and along the T‑0401 Pokrovske–Huliaipole highway — a vital supply route for Ukrainian forces. Russian units reached positions near Solodke, Yablukove, and Vesele, located within a nine-kilometer range of the town. Additional infiltration operations were also reported further north toward Danylivka, along the same highway.
ISW assessed that the Russian 5th Combined Arms Army and parts of the 36th Combined Arms Army are working to isolate Huliaipole from the northeast. The goal appears to be to degrade Ukrainian defenses through a mix of battlefield air interdiction, infiltration tactics, and coordinated ground advances. Meanwhile, elements of the 35th Combined Arms Army — previously stationed south and southwest of Huliaipole — have reportedly redeployed to reinforce the 5th Army's efforts.
According to ISW, the Russian military is likely avoiding a southern encirclement attempt, where Ukrainian defenses remain strongest.
Russian flags raised in Danylivka as Ukraine withdraws from Rivnopillya
Geolocated video published on 13 November showed Russian servicemembers raising flags in Danylivka, southwest of Velykomykhailivka. ISW assessed this to be the result of an infiltration mission, likely routed through Tsehelne and Yehorivka — two villages just east of Danylivka.
Map: ISW.
Russian sources claimed the seizure of both Rivnopillya, located northeast of Huliaipole, and Danylivka, with the latter reportedly taken by the Russian 5th Tank Brigade (36th CAA). Ukraine’s Southern Operational Command confirmed on 12 November that Ukrainian troops had withdrawn from Rivnopillya the evening before. On 13 November, Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief General Oleksandr Syrskyi said Russian forces were operating near Solodke, Yablukove, and Vesele — confirming continued Russian advances across multiple villages northeast and east of Huliaipole.
Russian brigades push toward Yehorivka and beyond
Ukrainian military observer Kostyantyn Mashovets reported on 13 November that elements of the Russian 37th Motorized Rifle Brigade reached the Novooleksandrivka–Oleksiivka line, southwest of Velykomykhailivka. The unit reportedly gained a foothold east of Yehorivka and achieved “tactical successes” in the Yehorivka–Danylivka direction over the past two weeks. Mashovets also noted that Russian forces crossed the Yanchur River near Uspenivka, northeast of Huliaipole, and advanced westward to the Solodke–Rivnopillya line — a seven-kilometer movement.
According to Mashovets, Russian command has concentrated forces from up to nine brigades and regiments — including one tank brigade — along a 41-kilometer front. Up to six additional regiment- and battalion-sized units were also identified. Among the reinforcements are elements of the Russian 69th Covering Brigade and 38th Motorized Rifle Brigade (both from the 35th CAA), likely now operating east and northeast of Huliaipole alongside the 5th CAA’s 127th Motorized Rifle Division.
He also assessed that Russian leadership may transfer units from the 58th Combined Arms Army (Southern Military District) and elements of the 98th Airborne Division and 41st CAA (both under the Central Grouping of Forces) to reinforce operations around Huliaipole and Velykomykhailivka.
Russia launched a large-scale overnight missile and drone attack on Ukraine on 14 November, killing at least five civilians in Kyiv and two in Chornomorsk, and injuring about 50 people across multiple regions, according to Ukrainian local and national authorities. Residential buildings, civilian infrastructure, and utility networks were damaged in Kyiv city, as well as in Kyiv Oblast, and several other regions including Odesa, Sumy, Kharkiv, and Kirovohrad.
The attack is part of Russia's ongoing terror campaign targeting civilians in rear cities every night. In recent months, Russia has expanded its drone and missile strikes from solely residential areas to also include power, heating, and gas infrastructure — aiming to leave Ukrainians without electricity and heating during winter, in the hope of forcing them into surrender.
Ukraine's Air Force says Kyiv was the primary target, with Kyiv Oblast, Kharkiv Oblast, Odesa Oblast, Poltava Oblast, and Cherkasy Oblast also affected.
Update: According to Kyiv Mayor Klitschko’s latest update at 19:44, the Russian nighttime attack killed six Kyiv residents and injured 36 people, with six of them in hospitals and five in serious condition.
Kyiv bears brunt of Russian attack with five deaths, apartments hit, power and heating outages reported
All five fatalities occurred in Desnianskyi district, where rescue operations continued throughout the morning. Among the 35 wounded were a 10-year-old child and a 7-year-old with facial injuries, and a pregnant woman who required hospitalization. One man remained in critical condition as of the morning.
The attack damaged dozens of residential buildings across Kyiv's Dniprovskyi, Darnytskyi, Desnianskyi, Podilskyi, Shevchenkivskyi, Solomyanskyi, Holosiivskyi, Sviatoshynskyi, and Obolonsky districts. In Dniprovskyi district, debris hit a five-story building, causing destruction on lower floors and fires in two apartments. Rescue workers evacuated nine people from that building. The district saw three multi-apartment buildings and one private residence damaged, with five people wounded.
A Russian strike on 14 October destroyed 10-year-old Viacheslav’s building in Kyiv.
“Our neighbors died & we couldn’t find our cat,” he says.
A nighttime drone blast blew out windows & set the upper floors on fire. Death toll rises to 6.
Podilskyi district suffered damage to five residential buildings and one non-residential structure, with fires reported on the 10th and 12th floors of different buildings. In Obolonskyi district, fires broke out on the seventh and ninth floors of one residential building. Desnianskyi district saw direct hits and fires in two multi-story buildings, where rescue teams worked through the morning clearing rubble.
A Kyiv woman from Dniprovskyi district described her experience to Suspilne:
"I heard nothing, I started putting out my hair. My hair caught fire, and then I saw that everything was dark, in smoke."
Power and heating facilities targeted
Russia damaged sections of Kyiv's heating networks during the attack, according to Klitschko. Parts of Desnianskyi district lost heating due to an emergency situation on heat transmission lines. Portions of Podilskyi district also experienced heating disruptions. Municipal services worked to determine the extent of damage and began immediate repairs.
Klitschko warned residents of possible electricity and water supply interruptions. Energy workers later reported they had eliminated localized emergency outages caused by the attack.
Last night, Russia launched 19 missiles and 430 drones. Most targeted Kyiv, where they killed at least 4, and injured 30, the authorities say.
Air defenders downed 14 missiles and 405 drones, Ukraine's Air Force says. 13 site were struck by "missiles and 23 strike drones",… pic.twitter.com/KO0Z3wX9kW
Seven more civilians injured across five districts of Kyiv Oblast
Kyiv Oblast authorities reportedno fatalities, but seven people were injured. Regional administration head Mykola Kalashnyk mentioned six injuries, while Irpin Mayor Oleksandr Markushyn reported that the Russian attack also injured a woman in his city.
In Bila Tserkva, a 55-year-old man suffered thermal burns.
In Fastivskyi district, a man sustained multiple shoulder wounds.
In Vyshhorodskyi district, a 47-year-old man, a 56-year-old man, and a 7-year-old child were injured.
In Buchanskyi district, a woman suffered a hand injury.
In Irpin district, a woman was treated for a bruised arm.
Damage to dozens of residential and non-residential buildings was reported, but no fires were recorded in the oblast outside Kyiv city.
Russia possibly deploys Zircon hypersonic missile against Sumy
Russian forces struck the outskirts of Sumy at 7:05 a.m., with Zelenskyy stating that Russia used a Zircon-type missile according to preliminary data. The explosion damaged road pavement, ruptured a fire hydrant causing water leaks, and temporarily closed a road section. Artem Kobzar, acting mayor of Sumy, reported no casualties from the strike.
The 3M22 Zircon is a Russian hypersonic cruise missile that the Kremlin positions as a super weapon without analogues. Russia developed it through the NPO Mashinostroyenia design bureau and first officially presented it in 2019. According to available data, the missile has a range of 400-600 km to over 1,000 km and travels at speeds up to Mach 8-9.
Russian forces also struck Sumy's industrial zone with drones around 9:00 a.m., causing a fire at a production facility. Sumy Oblast head Oleh Hryhorov noted that Russia attacked the industrial zone with drones for the second consecutive day.
Odesa Oblast: two dead, seven injured in Chornomorsk market attack
Russian forces attacked a local market in Chornomorsk, Odesa Oblast, with strike drones, killing two people and wounding seven others. Some of the wounded remained in serious condition, according to Odesa Oblast head Oleh Kiper.
The strike damaged the city square, shop facades, and private vehicles. The blast wave shattered windows in a nearby college. Rescue workers and all relevant services worked at the scene.
Critical infrastructure hit across seven oblasts
Vice Prime Minister Oleksii Kuleba reported heating and water supply disruptions in Kyiv city and oblast, Kharkiv, Odesa, Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Kirovohrad, and Donetsk oblasts. Repair crews deployed and activated reserve systems where needed.
Russian forces struck a non-operational private facility in Chuhuiv, Kharkiv Oblast, with drones, causing a fire in an administrative building, according to Mayor Halyna Minaieva. The attack caused no casualties.
More than 3,000 customers in Tsyrkuny community of Kharkiv Oblast lost gas service due to combat operations, Kharkiv branch of Gazmerezhi reported. The company received information about the gas supply disruption affecting part of Kharkiv district.
In Kirovohrad Oblast, Russian attacks damaged power transmission lines in Novoukrainka district, leaving 16 settlements without electricity. Regional administration head Andrii Raikovych reported that power was restored to all affected settlements by 8:08 a.m.
Ukrainian Air Force: 430 drones and 19 missiles launched
Ukrainian Air Force said air defenders shot down or suppressed 419 aerial targets out of 449 detected. Russia reportedly started the attack from 6:00 p.m. on 13 November using strike drones and missiles from air, ground, and sea platforms.
Moscow fired 430 Shahed and Gerbera long-range strike drones and 19 missiles from several location in Russia and occupied Crimea. Among the missiles used were three Kinzhal air-launched ballistic missiles from Ryazan Oblast, one Zircon anti-ship missile, six Iskander-K and Kalibr cruise missiles from occupied Crimea and the Black Sea, and nine Iskander-M and KN-23 ballistic missiles from Bryansk Oblast.
Ukraine’s Air Force stated that Russian forces launched 449 aerial threats: 430 strike UAVs and 19 missiles (ballistic and cruise). Out of these, 419 were intercepted or suppressed:
405 drones
6 ballistic missiles (Iskander-M or KN-23)
6 cruise missiles (Iskander-K or Kalibr)
2 Kinzhal missiles
The Air Force recorded missile and drone hits at 13 locations and debris falls at 44 locations.
Zelenskyy: attack aimed to maximize civilian harm
President Zelenskyy emphasized the deliberate nature of the Russian attack in his morning statement.
"A deliberately calculated attack to cause as much harm as possible to people and civilian infrastructure," he wrote.
The President emphasized that Russia continues to benefit financially from oil exports by circumventing existing sanctions. He called for these evasion schemes to be effectively shut down, and urged allied nations, particularly in Europe and the United States, to provide Ukraine with additional air defense systems and interceptor missiles.
"A lot of work is being done with partners to strengthen air defense, but not enough. Strengthening with additional systems and interceptor missiles is needed. Europe and the USA can help. We count on real decisions," he added.
US private equity firm Carlyle is considering acquiring Lukoil’s foreign assets, Reuters reports. The potential deal is unfolding under the pressure of a looming 21 November deadline, when Washington's sanctions will block all transactions with the Russian oil giant.
This comes amid Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine. Recently, the US imposed sanctions on two major Russian oil companies, Lukoil and Rosneft. Revenue from Moscow’s oil exports helps finance Russia’s war.
Lukoil, one of Russia’s most active energy firms abroad, has seen parts of its business hit by recent sanctions. Its operations in Iraq, Finland, and Bulgaria have already been disrupted. Carlyle, which manages $474 billion in assets, ranks among the largest private equity and financial services firms in the world.
Carlyle "exploring options to buy" Lukoil’s global oil assets before sanctions lockout
American company Carlyle has begun exploring the purchase of Lukoil’s foreign holdings, sources familiar with the situation told Reuters. The assets are estimated at $22 billion and include refineries, oilfields, and fuel stations across multiple continents. Carlyle has informed Lukoil of its interest but has not yet begun due diligence.
Before it can proceed, Carlyle plans to apply for a US government license to make the deal legal under existing sanctions. The firm could still walk away from the deal, Reuters reports, depending on the outcome of the license application and timing constraints.
Gunvor pushed out after US calls it Kremlin “puppet”
Lukoil had previously tried to sell the same assets to Swiss commodities trader Gunvor. But the US Treasury blocked the transaction, Reuters reported, labeling Gunvor a Kremlin “puppet.” The move forced Gunvor to withdraw. That left Carlyle, which experts told Reuters is more likely to win approval from Washington.
Lukoil has applied for an extension of the 21 November deadline, Reuters reported earlier this week. If the deadline stands, deals involving the company will be banned after that date.
$22 billion portfolio spans oilfields, refineries, and retail stations worldwide
Lukoil’s foreign assets produce 0.5% of the world’s oil and include three refineries in Europe, stakes in oilfields in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Mexico, Ghana, Egypt and Nigeria, and hundreds of fuel stations — including some in the US.
The company’s total global output amounts to about 2% of worldwide oil production. Its foreign portfolio, based on 2024 filings, is valued at roughly $22 billion.
Courts have detained five suspects while President Zelenskyy sanctioned two businessmen who fled Ukraine hours before raids in the expanding $100 million Energoatom corruption probe.
The scandal strikes at a particularly vulnerable moment. Ukraine generates over half its electricity from nuclear power after Russia seized the Zaporizhzhia plant, while citizens endure 12-hour blackouts from systematic Russian infrastructure strikes. The alleged theft—equivalent to 27 Patriot missiles or 40,000 interceptor drones—occurred while contractors built defenses for facilities under active bombardment, raising questions whether corruption functioned as simple enrichment or deliberate sabotage benefiting Moscow.
Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) 10 November revelations based on 15 months of surveillance, two cabinet ministers have resigned, the government has dissolved Energoatom's supervisory board, and authorities have announced comprehensive audits of all state enterprises.
Courts detain five suspects as investigation expands
Ukraine's High Anti-Corruption Court has ordered pre-trial detention for five individuals connected to the scheme, with bail options ranging from UAH12 million ($285.5K) to UAH126 million ($3.0M).
The court detained:
Ihor Myroniuk, former adviser to Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko, with bail set at $3 million. Prosecutors identified Myroniuk, codenamed "Rocket" in surveillance recordings, as having taken control of Energoatom's procurement processes alongside the company's security director.
Dmytro Basov, Energoatom's former executive director for physical protection, faces 60 days detention with $951.7K bail.
The court also detained three back office employees allegedly involved in money laundering: Liudmyla Zorina $285.5K Lesia Ustymenko $594.8K, and Ihor Fursenko.
Zelenskyy imposes sanctions on fleeing suspects
On 13 November, Volodymyr Zelenskyy also signed a decree imposing sanctions on two individuals implicated in the NABU case concerning Energoatom. As of the latest reports, these two individuals are:
Timur Mindich: A businessman and close associate of President Zelenskyy, as well as a co-owner of the president's former production company, Kvartal 95. NABU investigators allege he was the main organizer of the corruption scheme.
Oleksandr Tsukerman: A businessman alleged to have led the "back office" used for laundering the illicit funds (reportedly around $100 million).
Reportedly, both are citizens of Israel and fled Ukraine just hours before NABU detectives arrived to search.
The sanctions, in force for three years, include:
Revocation of state awards of Ukraine
Asset blocking in Ukraine
Restrictions on trade operations
Prevention of capital withdrawal from Ukraine
Suspension of economic and financial obligations
Termination or suspension of licenses and permits
Presidential Commissioner for Sanctions Policy Vladyslav Vlasiuk clarified the decision "provides for a full standard package, including the blocking of assets on the territory of Ukraine, regardless of the citizenship of the persons to whom they are applied," Interfax noted.
The immediate political fallout has been swift, as President Zelenskyy in his address called for the dismissal of two ministers linked to the energy portfolio. Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko, who previously served as Energy Minister, and current Energy Minister Svitlana Hrynchuk both tendered their resignations on 12 November. The Ukrainian Parliament is expected to vote on their dismissal on Tuesday, 18 November.
The Ministry of Economy, Environment, and Agriculture will submit proposals for a new Energoatom Supervisory Board within one week, working in cooperation with G7 partner countries, Ukrinform reported. The previous board was dissolved on 11 November after the Cabinet of Ministers deemed its work unsatisfactory.
"At the direction of Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko, the Ministry of Economy, Environment and Agriculture, in cooperation with G7 partners, will submit proposals to the government within the week for the new composition of the Supervisory Board," the ministry announced. An international advisory firm has been appointed to assist the selection process.
The State Audit Service has launched a comprehensive audit of Energoatom, with procurement review to be completed within 15 working days and a full company audit within 90 days. The findings will be forwarded to law enforcement and anti-corruption agencies.
Prime Minister Svyrydenko on 13 November announced Ukraine will conduct audits of all state-owned companies. "Eradicating corruption is a matter of honor and, most importantly, dignity. We bear responsibility before our defenders," she commented.
Ukraine Energoatom scandal investigation expands to examine Russian links
Some Ukrainian analysts view the scandal through a different lens—as potential evidence of Russian penetration rather than simple enrichment.
Olena Tregub, a prominent anti-corruption advocate, argued that the money-laundering schemes in the energy sector lead back to Andriy Derkach—an officially designated Russian agent and former Ukrainian politician now serving in Russia's parliament. Members of his network were employed inside Energoatom and participated in the alleged corruption scheme.
"This raises an uncomfortable but necessary question: were these officials stealing money simply to enrich themselves and buy luxury properties abroad—or were they intentionally weakening Ukraine?" Tregub wrote. The consequences include increased blackout risks and degraded defense capabilities, which would directly benefit Russia.
The Security Service of Ukraine has opened a separate investigation into Mindich for "assistance to an aggressor state" based on allegations about operations in Russia during the full-scale invasion.
Ukraine's National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NAZK) announced on 10 November it launched a service inspection after being mentioned in NABU's published materials. The agency sent an official request to NABU for relevant information and confirmed readiness for "maximum cooperation with the public, media, law enforcement, and other parties."
"No room for corruption": the view from Brussels and Berlin
The scandal has sent shockwaves to Ukraine's Western partners, who are pumping billions of dollars in financial and military aid into the country. The reaction from European capitals has been one of severe consternation.
Speaking to Reuters on the sidelines of a Group of Seven foreign ministers meeting in Canada, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas stressed the urgency of the situation around the Energoatom scandal. "There is no room for corruption, especially now. I mean, it is literally the people's money that should go to the front lines," Kallas said. "I think what is very important that they really proceed with this very fast and take it very seriously," she added.
The European Commission, which is overseeing Ukraine's complex EU accession process, is reportedly monitoring the government's response closely.
This is particularly true for Germany, which has been a major supporter of Ukraine's energy sector. German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius told DW that Berlin is concerned about reports involving "a sector that receives considerable support from Germany." The government will "very closely monitor developments," he said.
While expressing concern, Kornelius also offered a guarded note of trust: "at the moment we have confidence in the Ukrainian government that it will ensure this be cleared up... and in the anti-corruption authority that it will lay bare this case and it will be brought to a transparent conclusion."
A Russian shadow laboratory for new military tactics is rapidly advancing, according to Kyiv military sources. The most elite drone center, Rubicon (also spelled Rubikon), is now focused on eliminating Ukrainian operators and operates in hot spots along the front, the Financial Times reported.
Ukrainian soldiers say the defense of Pokrovsk was “like a holiday” for Ukrainian forces before Rubikon entered this sector of the front.
Armed, aggressive Russia is experimenting with new methods of warfare. Without support from the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the form of air defence, electronic warfare, and intelligence, Russian offensives become more dangerous.
New survival rule on the front
“Be humble, be silent, mask your position, and don’t move when it’s not necessary. Best to sit in your trench and watch Instagram,"jokes Ukrainian operator Dmytro.
According to experts, Rubikon has roughly 5,000 fighters and large financial resources. Its task is to disrupt Ukrainian logistics, destroy drone command teams, and train other Russian units.
Russian Rubikon has no days off
“They have a lot of people, and that means they can work 24 hours a day, seven days a week. They can change teams every five hours, they can sleep. It’s more difficult for us because we don’t have many people to rotate all the time, and we still need to sleep," said another Ukrainian soldier.
Meanwhile, Rob Lee of the Philadelphia-based Foreign Policy Research Institute notes that Rubikon has become a center of Russian army innovation, developing new tactics and technologies.
"It’s more than a unit; it is a centre — a centre for all kinds of unmanned systems development," he says.
Now Kyiv must counter the highly organized Rubikon strategy by developing its own clear, centralized battle plan, he added.
In response, the Ukrainian forces are creating their own “anti‑drone” groups, changing tactics, better camouflaging positions, and restricting movement.
Earlier, LIGA.net reported that Russian military intelligence and Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov stand behind the Rubikon center, according to a Ukrainian Defense Intelligence officer with the callsign "Azimut".
The officer added that Rubikon shows “strong political will and a large role” of Russian special services directly in organizing this structure.
The intelligence officer also noted that elitism indeed exists within Rubikon. For example, recruiters for this unit have the right to take personnel from any units.
“They simply arrive — and have full access to pilots from other combined-arms units," said the officer.
Therefore, he noted, due to political will, this formation has “maximum opportunities for its development and maximum access to financing and technologies.”
Earlier, the Ukrainian Defense Intelligence reported that its soldiers had discovered the Rubikon base in Avdiivka, Donetsk Oblast. The city fell under Russian control in 2014.
Using precise coordinates of Russia's position, Ukrainian intelligence operators directed its new FP-2 unmanned aerial vehicle, equipped with a 105-kilogram warhead, toward the Russian target amid dense urban terrain.
As a result of the strike, Ukrainian Intelligence eliminated Russian officers and drone operators from the unit who were inside their headquarters.
The possibility of using €140 billion of frozen Russian assets for a reparations loan to Ukraine is a unique opportunity for the state. Especially since the US has ceased military aid following Donald Trump's election. However, legal challenges in using these assets are compounded by concerns over how the money might be utilized amid the backdrop of a new corruption scandal, La Repubblica reports.
On 10 November, EU-backed anti-corruption agencies uncovered a large scheme, "Midas", involving four Ukrainian ministries and the country's top energy company. The case is especially painful to the ordinary Ukrainians, who continue to endure up to 12-hour blackouts following Russian missile attacks.
According to investigators, the perpetrators demanded kickbacks amounting to 10–15% of Energoatom contract values. Contractors had to pay to avoid blocked payments or the loss of supplier status. Timyr Mindich, one of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's closest associates, oversaw the operation of a so-called “laundromat”, where funds were stolen.
The embezzlement of state funds in the energy sector, exceeding $100 million, has raised significant concerns in Europe.
The "Midas" corruption case under Europe's scrutiny
During the Eurogroup meeting on 12 November, where instruments for financing Ukrainian resistance over the next two years were again discussed, several finance ministers repeatedly referred to this corruption case.
Moreover, the scandal in Ukraine erupted after the release of the latest European Commission report on the EU candidate countries, presented last week. It provides a clear assessment that Ukraine has made limited progress in the fight against corruption.
The report also mentions the temporary suspension in July of the independence of the anti-corruption agencies, which are currently handling the case involving the embezzlement of $100 million in state funds. These institutions, according to the report, report growing pressure from state authorities.
Taiwanese companies continue to supply precision industrial machines for factories that fuel Russia’s war machine, in defiance of sanctions, according to an investigation by Ukrainian watchdog organization StateWatch.
Precision tools process high-strength alloys used in the production of artillery barrels, missile bodies and drones. Russia imports at least 70% of its Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines from companies in Europe and Asia. Most countries involved have banned selling Russia equipment that can be used to make war materiel.
Moscow gets around these bans, largely by working with middlemen in countries like China and Türkiye. However, “even Taiwan, a strategic partner of the US, has been implicated in these supply chains,” StateWatch wrote in its 13 November report.
Since 2022, millions of dollars worth of dual-use machinery has made its way into Russia through Taiwan’s involvement. These include brands like Fedek, Sunmill, and Golden Machinery.
The recipients include companies linked to Russia's military-industrial complex, including Zenik, Kami-Group, Intervesp, Metalmash, and Stanki Tekhnologii Instrument.
At least 70% of Russia's CNC machinetools are imported, largely from the US, EU, and Japan. Over 80% of all CNCs end up in Russia's military production facilities.
Over $10 million worth of industrial equipment
LNS Group is a global company that manufactures bar feeders and CNC lathes. According to Russian customs data, LNS machines worth nearly $5 million have entered Russia since the start of the full-scale invasion.
These exports were mainly facilitated by Taiwanese company TWT Global Enterprise limited. Kami-Group, which sells machine tools, is the largest Russian recipient, according to the report.
Russian company Zenit published a YouTube video in December 2024, showing LNS’s Fedek-branded equipment at its factory.
A flashlight manufacturer, Zenit also makes red-dot and thermal sights, laser target designators, and tactical firearm accessories for Russia's troops and intelligence agencies, on top of donating products to Russian troops in Ukraine.
Fedek machines have also been spotted at the G.I. Petrovsky Plant in Nizhny Novgorod, which makes equipment for the Russian Navy, engineering troops, and manufactures avionics.
Zenit's video also shows Sunmill machines. The manufacturer, Jeenxi Technology Co, of Taiwan, “supplied high-precision equipment directly to Russia’s military sector” also to the tune of $5 million, as of December 2024, according to StateWatch.
Russian state contractors Intervesp and Intervesp-M, both of which are internationally sanctioned, were reportedly among the recipients.
Taiwanese Golden Machinery Co, which manufactures beverage bottling equipment, supplied $800,000 worth of industrial machines to Russia, according to customs data.
The main recipient was Stanki Tekhnologii, which trades in metalworking equipment and its website shows it regularly signing contracts with Russian defense enterprises.
Stanki Tekhnologii got $430,000 worth of equipment directly from the manufacturer and the rest via a Turkish intermediary.
South Korean firms also implicated
South Korean brands have also been spotted in Russia, according to a recent report by the Economic Security Council of Ukraine, a Kyiv think tank.
Between 2024 and 2025, more than $3.7 million worth of Korean-made cutting tools and CNC machines got into Russia through complex transshipment networks involving China, Türkiye, India, Uzbekistan, Lithuania and Thailand.
Products from at least three South Korean precision toolmakers were exhibited at the annual Metalloobraboka expo in Moscow in May.
“The key issue is not simply covert shipments,” Olena Yurchenko, director for analysis and investigations at ESCU, wrote in a statement to Korea JoongAng Daily and Euromaidan Press.
“What we find alarming is that products made by South Korean brands, which are de facto banned from Russia [since 2022], are now being openly advertised and promoted in Moscow."
Moscow casts a wide net
These figures are a drop in the bucket compared to the $18 billion worth of machine toolsreportedly supplied to Russia from Europe and China.
This includes 57 CNC machines worth over $26.5 million from European subsidiaries, along with components and consumables valued at more than $9.5 million.
In October, Germany raided Spinner, a high-precision machine tool manufacturer suspected of knowingly supplying equipment to Russia's military industry. Three individuals have already been charged with violating sanctions.
Kenya says more than 200 of its nationals are fighting for Russia in Ukraine, with recruitment networks still operating in both Africa and Russia, according to a statement issued on 12 November by Kenya’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as reported by Reuters.
Amid heavy losses in its ongoing invasion of Ukraine, Russia has sought to replenish its military ranks by offering contract-based enlistment in place of widely unpopular mobilization. This effort includes recruiting not only Russian nationals but also foreign fighters — at times using deceptive methods.
The announcement followed a statement from Ukraine last week claiming that over 1,400 citizens from three dozen African countries are currently fighting on Russia’s side. Ukraine’s foreign minister, Andriy Sybiha, described the contracts offered to African recruits as “equivalent to ... a death sentence,” and called on African governments to warn their citizens.
Nairobi confirms citizens misled into joining war
The Kenyan Foreign Ministry said its citizens are being recruited into Moscow’s war effort through networks active both in Russia and in Kenya, Reuters reported. According to the statement, “over two hundred Kenyans may have joined the Russian military,” with officials warning that recruitment activities are still ongoing.
Explore further
Kenyan athlete says he was lured to Russian army, but Ukrainian fighters who captured him aren’t so sure about that
The Ministry added that its embassy in Moscow had recorded injuries among some of the Kenyan recruits. Those injured had allegedly been promised up to $18,000, covering visa costs, travel, and accommodation. But instead of receiving non-combat roles, they were deployed to the battlefield.
According to the Ministry, those recruited had been misled into believing they would be doing civilian support tasks. These included assembling drones, handling chemicals, and painting — not direct involvement in combat operations.
Explore further
Russia’s war needs bodies: Kenyan recruits rescued before being shipped to Ukraine frontline
21 rescued in Kenyan raid tied to recruitment ring
Kenyan security services conducted a raid near Nairobi in September that resulted in the rescue of 21 citizens who, according to the foreign ministry, were being prepared for deployment to Ukraine. The ministry said the individuals had been deceived about the nature of their roles.
A months-long political deadlock ended as Montenegro’s parliament approved the deployment of its troops to NATO's Ukraine training mission, according to RFE/RL Participation in the mission will be limited strictly to NATO member states’ territory. NATO’s broader role involves coordinating training for Ukraine’s security forces. Montenegro is expected to contribute to a second Ukraine-related initiative — the EU Military Assistance Mission Ukraine (EUMAM) — approved earlier this year after similar delays.
Montenegro joined NATO in 2017 under the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), which lost power in 2020. Some current officials, including Speaker Andrija Mandić, have shown open hostility to NATO and support for Russian President Vladimir Putin. Mandić, who leads the pro-Russian Democratic Front, has previously voted against a resolution condemning Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Parliament authorizes Montenegro’s troops to join NATO mission for Ukraine
On 12 November, Montenegro’s Skupština voted to allow the country’s military to participate in NATO’s security assistance and training activities for Ukraine, according to RFE/RL. The decision, passed after nine months of delay, saw 44 out of 81 lawmakers in favor, with five voting against and two abstaining.
The plan to include Montenegro in NATO’s NSATU (NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine) initiative was originally adopted by the country’s Defense and Security Council on 7 February. The council includes President Jakov Milatović, Prime Minister Milojko Spajić, and parliamentary speaker Andrija Mandić.
Montenegrin Defense Minister Dragan Krapović noted the decision aligns with the support path adopted at the NATO summit in Washington last year.
Ruling coalition split over supporting Russia or Ukraine
Despite government backing, the Democratic People's Party (DNP), part of the ruling coalition, opposed the decision. DNP lawmaker Vladislav Bojović claimed that the move could “further endanger our relations with the Russian Federation,” adding, “It would be wiser to stay neutral when it comes to other people’s conflicts.” Speaker Mandić’s party also opposes sanctions Montenegro imposed on Russia.
The US has imposed new sanctions on 32 legal entities involved in the supply network for components used to produce Shahed-136 kamikaze drones. Among them are two companies registered in Ukraine, according to the US Department of the Treasury.
Ukrainian companies under foreign control
The adversary may aim to use this information as “evidence” of corruption, internal collaboration with the enemy, or other theories. While the companies are formally registered in Ukraine, control is effectively in foreign hands.
An Iranian citizen, Bahram Tabibi, “used his Ukrainian shell companies” to “purchase and supply aerospace materials” for the Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industrial Company, the producer of the Shahed drones.
Since 2022, Iran has been supplying these drones to Russia for attacks on Ukraine, until Moscow established domestic production of the drones, mostly in the Republic of Tatarstan. The Shahed model, assembled in the Alabuga factory, contains 294 imported components.Of those, around 120 come from China and Taiwan, and 100 from the US.
The supplies included position indicators, magnetometers, AC generator components, engines, and other equipment.
The companies named are LLC "GK Imperativ Ukraine" and LLC "Ecofera"
According to the Opendatabot portal, LLC "GK Imperativ Ukraine" was registered in 2018 in Kharkiv and is engaged in trade. The company’s owner is an Iranian citizen, Bahram Tabibi Jabali.
As for LLC "Ecofera," no publicly available information has been found.
Ukrainian forces are disrupting the plans of Russian invaders. Commander of the Unmanned Systems Forces Robert Brovdi, also known as Madiar, reports that Ukrainian soldiers destroyed a storage and maintenance base for Russian Orion strike-reconnaissance drones in temporarily occupied Crimea near the settlement of Kirovske.
Kyiv continues its long-range strike campaign in response to Russia's attacks, targeting its military, military‑industrial, and logistics sites.
The commander emphasized that these drones carry aerial bombs and air-to-ground missiles, can remain airborne for up to 24 hours at altitudes of up to 7,500 meters, and have a wingspan of 16.3 meters.
“Madiar’s Birds” unit carried out a precise strike on 13 November
According to him, fighters from the "Madiar’s Birds" unit struck the base at night.
"The Topot unit of the 414th Brigade of Madiar’s Birds shot down such a 'parrot' in the air on September 13, 2025, with AI and Google assistance. Tonight, the Birds of the 1st Separate Unmanned Systems Center (transformed from the 14th Regiment) finally pecked the lair," said Brovdi.
Synchronized strikes on Russian and temporarily occupied territories
On 13 November, Ukrainian Defense Forces struck dozens of targets on Russian territory and temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories, using Flamingo missiles among other weapons.
In Crimea, the strikes hit a petroleum storage facility of "Morskoy Neftyanoy Terminal", helicopter parking areas, unmanned aerial vehicle storage and preparation sites at Kirovske airfield, and an air defense radar station near Yevpatoria.
Ukrainian strategy: targeting Russian logistics and aerial capabilities
These strikes demonstrate how Ukrainian Defense Forces systematically degrade Russian capabilities in temporarily occupied territories, destroying key logistical and technological Russian nodes, particularly those supporting strike-reconnaissance drones.
Some European countries believe that Russian leader Vladimir Putin will eventually win in Ukraine, according to Bundestag member Jürgen Hardt from the ruling Christian Democratic Union, UkrInform reports. This conviction persists despite Ukraine successfully defending against the attacks of the world’s largest country for 11 years.
Over the past year, Moscow has occupied only 1% of Ukrainian territory, but in total, Moscow controls about 18% of Ukraine. That is the amount of territory Russia has managed to occupy since 2014. The only regional center Russia captured in Ukraine since 2022 was Kherson, which Ukraine liberated the same year.
How to defeat Russia?
If Putin realizes the risk of defeat, the chances for real, fair negotiations without Kremlin diktat increase. Therefore, the German government plans to provide about €1 billion per month in military support to Ukraine, Hardt confirmed.
The German government plans to increase defense aid to Ukraine by an additional €3 billion in 2026, compared to the previous budget plan, bringing the total to over €11.5 billion.
These funds are intended for Ukraine’s military needs, to maintain its armed forces, and to continue resisting the Russian attack, the politician clarified.
Hardt noted that Ukraine finances part of its needs from its own tax revenues, but a significant portion comes from external sources, and Germany is one of the leading contributors. He emphasized that Germany is Ukraine’s largest financial donor and politically one of its strongest allies.
The Bundestag member said the federal government is working to mobilize more resources, including providing Ukraine with loans secured by Russian assets that are currently frozen; pushing the European Union to do more; and encouraging other European partners, such as the UK, to increase their engagement so that the circle of actively supporting countries expands.
He also expressed hope that the US can be convinced that it is in America’s interest to help create a strong Ukraine as soon as possible. Since the US President Donald Trump's administration took office, not a single military aid package has been announced for Ukraine.
Russia must lose this war
Currently, Hardt acknowledged, there is no consensus that the best way to contain Russian aggression is to make Ukraine so strong that Putin is forced to recognize the possibility of failure. Meanwhile, in some capitals, there is still a belief that the Russian leader will eventually win.
Currently, he believes he will win this war as well. When he realizes, or believes, that defeat is possible, there may be a chance for truly fair and sensible peace negotiations without diktat. This is the purpose of the aid. Russia must lose this war, he added.
A major fire broke out today, 13 November, at one of the petrochemical plants in Nizhnekamsk, Tatarstan. According to preliminary reports, the blaze started in one of the production units of the “Nizhnekamskneftekhim” enterprise, which is among the key facilities in Russia’s petrochemical industry, Astra reports.
Black smoke over the industrial zone as a signal of problems in Russia’s economy
Photos shared on local social media show thick black smoke rising above the industrial area. No casualties have been reported to date, and the cause of the fire has not been officially determined.
The plant specializes in the construction, repair, and modernization of petrochemical and energy industry facilities, performing the full cycle of work, from manufacturing metal structures to installing technological equipment.
Experts note that such incidents reduce the production capacity of Russia’s petrochemical sector — one of the industries directly financing the war against Ukraine. Even if officially labeled as “fires,” the real economic damage to Russia could be significant.
A war that destroys not only Ukraine but Russia itself
Nizhnekamsk is located more than 1,000 kilometers from the Ukrainian border, but the war Russia is waging increasingly “comes back home,” damaging its economy, technological potential, and sense of security.
Ukraine has started equipping its Mi-8 helicopters with American-made M134 Minigun systems to counter Russian Shahed kamikaze drones, according to footage published by the Instagram account aero.tim and reported by Militarnyi.
Russia launches swarms of Shahed kamikaze drones at Ukrainian cities every night, overwhelming air defenses with sheer numbers. These Iranian-designed attack drones are difficult targets for expensive surface-to-air missiles. Helicopter-mounted machine guns give Ukraine another option for intercepting drones without burning through costly missile stockpiles.
The video shows a Mi-8 door gunner firing several bursts at an incoming drone, which then veers off course and crashes. The modification gives the Soviet-designed helicopters a major boost in firepower against low-flying targets that have become a constant threat across Ukraine.
Why Ukraine is putting American miniguns on Soviet helicopters
According to Ukrainian defense portal Militarnyi, the M134 Minigun is a six-barrel, electrically driven machine gun chambered in 7.62×51 mm NATO. It can fire between 2,000 and 6,000 rounds per minute - about eight times faster than the standard PKT machine guns typically mounted on Mi-8s.
Often seen on US helicopters such as the Black Hawk and Huey, the Minigun can be mounted in fixed or swivel configurations, allowing gunners to cover a wide firing arc. Beyond defending against drones, the weapon is also effective for close air support and suppressing enemy firing positions.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov used a media interview to unleash a barrage of accusations against the Baltic States, echoing the same narratives Russia once used to justify its invasions of Ukraine. According to the Institute for the Study of War, this signals a renewed Kremlin effort to set long-term pretext conditions for a possible future attack on Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania.
This comes amid the ongoing Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Many experts and officials have warned that if Ukraine falls, the Baltic nations could become the next target of Russian aggression.
Lavrov escalates anti-Baltic rhetoric in major narrative shift
The Institute says Russia is "conducting multiple information operations against the Baltic States as it did to justify the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, likely as part of Phase Zero conditions-setting for a possible attack on the Baltic States at some point in the future." ISW, however, doesn't predict an "imminent Russian attack on the Baltics" yet.
Lavrov’s comments, given in a 11 November interview to Russian media, combined several long-running Russian propaganda claims into a single statement. He accused Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania of harboring “Russophobia,” promoting “anti-Russian” sentiment, and mistreating Russian speakers. He also alleged that the Baltic States had violated agreements with Russia and painted them as pawns of the United Kingdom. According to Lavrov, they had lost their sovereignty and were no longer truly European.
ISW noted that these narratives have appeared individually in past Kremlin messaging, but their combination in one statement is “noteworthy.” The Kremlin has used similar accusations against Ukraine to justify the 2014 occupation of Crimea and the 2022 full-scale invasion.
No signs of imminent attack, but groundwork being laid
ISW assessed that Lavrov’s statements are part of ongoing Russian Phase Zero operations — a strategy to set informational conditions for possible military aggression. It emphasized that such efforts can last for years and do not necessarily result in an attack. ISW said there are no indicators of imminent military preparations against NATO states.
Still, the think tank stressed that these activities echo pre-2022 Russian efforts toward Ukraine and warned against ignoring the parallels.
"ISW’s assessments that these and other activities constitute Phase Zero conditions-setting efforts are meant to call attention to the parallels with pre-2022 Russian conditions-setting efforts vis-à-vis Ukraine but are not an imminent attack warning at this time," the think tank wrote.
Last night, Ukrainian Telegram channels reported several Ukrainian attacks within Russia and in the occupied part of Ukraine. Long-range drones and Flamingo missiles were used in the attacks, according to monitoring accounts and videos. Later, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine confirmed an attack on occupied Berdiansk, confirmed attacks inside Russia without specifying the targets, and reported an attack in occupied Crimea.
Amid the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war, Kyiv continues its long-range strike campaign, targeting Russian military, military‑industrial, and logistics sites inside Russia. Ukraine is also hitting Russian power facilities in retaliation for Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s energy grid as winter approaches.
Explosions reported in Belgorod, Krasnodar, Oryol, occupied Zaporizhzhia and Crimea
Around 17:00 on 12 November, Ukrainian Telegram channel Supernova+ shared photos showing fire and smoke near Nikolskoe in Russia's Belgorod Oblast north of Ukraine. The caption stated there were “reports of a UAV attack.”
Later, the same channel posted an image from Gulkevichi in Krasnodar Krai, southern Russia, showing a fire, reporting a power substation "incident" that left nearby Novokubansk without electricity.
Exilenova+ shared videos from occupied Berdyansk (Zaporizhzhia Oblast) late on Nov 12, reporting a drone attack, Russian air defense activity, and two possible hits. pic.twitter.com/LIFzkxXyia
Late on 12 November, Ukrainian Telegram channel Exilenova+ shared video footage of air defense activity in occupied Berdiansk, Zaporizhzhia Oblast. The channel noted that local residents reported two strikes, adding that this information “requires clarification.”
In the early hours of 13 November, Exilenova+ posted additional videos from Afipsky, a Russian settlement in Krasnodar Krai that hosts an oil refinery. Locals were heard complaining about the work of air defense systems during the apparent attack.
Exilenova+ posted footage from Oryol, Russia, where locals reported an attack, and burning debris was seen falling.
A later photo shows damage at the Oryol TPP, which was reportedly targeted with Ukrainian Flamingo missiles. Exilenova+, Nikolaevsky Vanyok pic.twitter.com/6fJs7VO8GI
The same channel also reported an attack on Oryol, a city in western Russia. One of the videos showed burning debris falling from the sky. Later, Exilenova+ shared a photo showing structural damage at the Oryol thermal power plant — specifically, a large hole in a wall of one of its workshops. A Ukrainian airspace monitoring account, Nikolaevsky Vanyok, stated that Flamingo missiles had been used in the Oryol attack, sharing photos of a missile marked with the user’s avatar.
In occupied Crimea, explosions were reported in Feodosiya on the peninsula’s eastern coast. The Krymsky Veter Telegram channel said powerful blasts were heard in the area.
General Staff confirms hits in Berdiansk, Crimea, and unspecified targets in Russia
Ukraine’s General Staff says Defense Forces hit several dozen targets overnight in Russia and occupied Ukrainian territories.
The strikes involved UAVs, jet-powered drones, and Ukrainian-made Flamingo, Bars, and Lyutyi systems. General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine pic.twitter.com/u9uOnEkuIk
According to the military, "a number" of enemy targets were hit overnight in both occupied Ukraine and inside Russian territory. The specific extent of damage was still being assessed.
In occupied Zaporizhzhia Oblast, Ukraine confirmed a hit on an oil depot near Berdiansk, as well as forward command posts belonging to Russia’s 5th Combined Arms Army and the 127th Motor Rifle Division.
In occupied Crimea, Ukrainian forces reported strikes on multiple military facilities. Targets included the Maritime Oil Terminal, helicopter parking areas, and drone preparation sites at the Kirovske airfield, and an air defense radar station near Yevpatoriya on the western coast. The General Staff did not mention the location of the oil terminal, but the report likely refers to the facility in Feodosiya.
While no specific Russian regions were mentioned, the General Staff stated that targets in Russia were also hit. The report emphasized that the strikes were part of a systemic campaign to degrade the logistical and offensive capabilities of Russian forces.
The General Staff noted that Ukraine employed various long-range strike systems in the operation, including domestically developed Flamingo missiles, and the drones such as Bars and Lyutyi.
The UK will ban its firms from providing shipping or insurance services for Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports starting in 2026, aiming to curb Moscow’s fossil fuel revenues that fund its war against Ukraine.
While Britain and the EU banned direct imports of Russian LNG years ago following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Western companies have still been allowed to transport and insure Russian gas bound for other markets - a gap campaigners have fought for years to close.
Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper announced the move at a G7 meeting in Canada, describing it as a coordinated effort with the EU, which plans to phase out Russian LNG imports under long-term contracts by early 2027.
Britain banned direct imports in 2023, but its maritime and insurance sectors have continued to handle shipments from Russia’s Yamal terminal.
Campaigners welcome the move, urge faster action
A recent report by the Ukrainian group Razom We Stand identified Glasgow-based Seapeak Maritime as having facilitated about 4 million tons of Russian LNG in the first half of 2025 - nearly 40 percent of exports from Yamal. The group said the UK’s new measures mark a long-awaited success after more than three years of advocacy.
“The government’s move is a long-overdue and welcome step,” said Razom We Stand founder Svitlana Romanko. “But the UK must not slow-walk the phase-out, and Prime Minister Starmer should immediately cancel the indefensible energy contract with TotalEnergies - a firm still collaborating with Russia and helping raise billions for its war machine.”
Razom We Stand also urged London to align with upcoming G7 and EU sanctions and to consider secondary sanctions targeting Russian LNG exports and the shadow fleet that carries them.
Coordinated Pressure on Russia’s Energy Sector
Western allies have increasingly targeted Russia’s remaining energy revenues as oil price caps and pipeline gas embargoes lose impact. The G7 is discussing further restrictions on LNG transshipment and the use of Western shipping insurance - key pressure points in global trade.
By joining these measures, the UK seeks to limit Russia’s ability to reroute gas through intermediary countries and close off financial channels that have helped sustain its war economy.
Cooper said the UK’s approach “shows unity with our partners in cutting off Russia’s access to the revenues it uses to wage this illegal war,” adding that London “will keep tightening sanctions until Putin ends his aggression.”
Ukraine has received €5.9 billion from the EU under ERA Loans and the Ukraine Facility, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has announced. A key feature is that part of these funds is financed from profits on frozen Russian assets.
These funds are granted to Ukraine specifically for implementing and achieving a series of important reforms. Key priorities remain the fight against corruption and money laundering. On 10 November, EU-backed anti-corruption institutions exposed a scheme that facilitated the embezzlement of €100 million in kickbacks from an energy company that operates nuclear power plants.
“Today, there is an important decision in support of our country from our partners. Importantly, the ERA Loans mechanism is financed from profits from frozen Russian assets, which makes Russia pay for its aggression,” Zelenskyy said.
Ukraine aims to access €140 billion of frozen Russian assets in Europe and use them to support the war effort
According to Zelenskyy, only pressure can work to achieve peace, so efforts must be intensified to use Russian assets.
The majority of these funds are held in the Euroclear financial depository in Belgium. A decision on whether to transfer the funds to Ukraine is expected in December 2025, Politico reports.
Previously, Zelenskyy stated that it would be a significant loss for Russia if Ukraine were to succeed in accessing €140–160 billion of frozen Russian assets.
“We are counting on a swift political decision regarding the reparations loan and full use of these funds for Ukraine’s defense. I thank President Ursula von der Leyen for her leadership and support of Ukraine,” he summarized.
ERA Loans and Ukraine Facility — financial instruments for security and reforms
Meanwhile, Ukrainian Prime Minister Yuliya Svyrydenko has explained that €4.1 billion under ERA Loans is the final tranche of an €18 billion program, financed from profits on frozen Russian assets.
“This is an example of how Russia begins to pay for its crimes. At the same time, it is a signal of European solidarity and determination to support our ability to endure,” the official noted.
An additional €1.8 billion was received under the Ukraine Facility, reflecting confidence in Ukraine’s implementation of reforms and its European integration.
Ukrainian forces are losing Pokrovsk but winning the battle north of the city
The 1st Azov Corps is mopping up Russian troops north of Pokrovsk and may soon redeploy elsewhere
It's probably too late to save Pokrovsk, but Ukrainian troops defending Huliaipole in the south badly need reinforcements
Every deployment decision is painful for Ukrainian commanders facing a 5-to-1 troop disadvantage
The Ukrainian 1st Azov Corps is mopping up the last Russian positions in a 40-square-kilometer salient north of Pokrovsk in Donetsk Oblast, winning a two-month battle that could free up hundreds—possibly thousands—of troops. Meanwhile, Pokrovsk itself is falling to Russian infiltrators after a yearlong siege, and 100 kilometers south, Russia's 90th Tank Division is advancing across open terrain toward the logistics hub of Huliaipole in Zaporizhzhia Oblast.
The victories north of Pokrovsk create a brutal dilemma: Ukrainian commanders can use these freed-up troops to buttress the new defensive line forming north of the fallen city—or rush them 100 kilometers south to Huliaipole, where Russia's 90th Tank Division is advancing across open terrain toward Zaporizhzhia.
Outnumbered five-to-one, they don't have enough troops to do both.
Ukrainian forces gain ground north of Pokrovsk
Counterattacks by the Ukrainian 1st Azov Corps since mid-August have steadily reduced a 40-square-kilometer salient that the Russian 132nd Motor Rifle Brigade had carved out of the front line north of Pokrovsk a few weeks earlier. The salient bent toward the village of Dobropillia, which sits astride one of the main supply lines into Pokrovsk.
Liberating the village of Kucheriv Yar late last month and defending the nearby village of Shakhove from repeated Russian mechanized assaults, Ukrainian forces have the momentum in the salient battle. Now they're killing, capturing, or forcing out the last few Russians.
Ukraine faces a dilemma: either reinforce positions north of Pokrovsk or tackle the Huliapole advance. Map by Euromaidan Press based on Deepstatemap
The armed forces of Ukraine "are continuing to mop-up the Dobropillia salient, successfully recapturing several positions around the village of Shakhove," the pro-Ukraine Conflict Intelligence Team reported last week. "These successes may allow Ukrainian reserves to be redeployed from this sector to strengthen the Pokrovsk direction."
In other words, Russian commanders may have viewed the Dobropillia salient as a "counter-fixation axis for Ukrainian reserves," according to military theorist Delwin. The Russians devoted just enough troops and vehicles to the salient battle to keep the 1st Azov Corps fixated on fighting north of Pokrovsk—so the corps wouldn't shift its attention to Pokrovsk proper.
Explore further
Dobropillia diversion: did Russia trick Ukraine into losing Pokrovsk?
Pokrovsk likely lost despite northern gains
The problem, however, is that the Russians have the momentum in Pokrovsk—and it may be impossible for the Ukrainians, outnumbered five to one, to seize it from them. "Russian forces will very likely seize Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad," the Institute for the Study of War in Washington, D.C. concluded Tuesday.
The Russians succeeded in infiltrating Pokrovsk following a brutal yearlong siege in part because the salient battle drew the 1st Azov Corps into fighting north of Pokrovsk—keeping it from fighting in Pokrovsk, which was garrisoned by two exhausted Ukrainian units. The 68th Jaeger Brigade and 155th Mechanized Brigade began retreating north in late October.
Now that the 1st Azov Corps is on the verge of winning the salient fight, it's probably too late to do much for Pokrovsk. A few elite Ukrainian units, including one commando team that helicoptered into the city on 29 October, are clinging to fighting positions on the northern edge of Pokrovsk, holding open a narrow escape route for any Ukrainian troops still attempting to flee that city or neighboring Myrnohrad.
Pokrovsk, a once-thriving mining city of 60,000 people, is almost certainly lost—as is smaller Myrnohrad. The Ukrainian forces romping to victory in the disappearing Dobropillia salient may end up staying in the area, buttressing a new defensive line north of Pokrovsk.
Southern front threatens Huliaipole logistics hub
Or they may head south to the junction of Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts, where a powerful force led by the Russian army's biggest division, the 90th Tank Division, has been steadily advancing across unfortified open terrain, pushing back an outgunned and outnumbered Ukrainian force.
"Unfortunately, over the past few weeks, Russian forces have made a series of gains toward Huliaipole and, more broadly, achieved notable advances in the southeastern sector," explained Tatarigami, founder of the Ukrainian Frontelligence Insight analysis group.
Reinforcements could stiffen Ukrainian defenses around Huliaipole. But Ukrainian commanders must choose carefully where they send their precious few reserves.
Their choice to fight so hard over the Dobropillia salient may have hastened Pokrovsk's fall. Likewise, rushing troops south to Huliaipole could weaken the new defensive line forming north of Pokrovsk.
At the same time, stiffening that defensive line at the expense of Huliaipole could accelerate Russian gains in the south. As long as Russia has more troops than Ukraine has, there are no easy choices for infantry-starved Ukrainian commanders.
Explore further
Ukraine dominates with drones—until fog arrives in Pokrovsk
Russian drones and aircraft have breached NATO airspace. This is a strategic attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to intimidate European allies supporting Ukraine, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy told Bloomberg.
This fall, European states have faced drone attacks, with most of the targets reportedly being reconnaissance type. They started with a massive assault on Poland during the Zapad-2025 drills in Belarus. Ukraine's Defense Intelligence has called it a preparation for a potential war with the West from Belarusian territory. After the attack, Poland itself saw an unprecedented surge in anti-Ukrainian sentiments, fueled by fear of war and Russian propaganda. Thus, the Russian strategy is working.
Special operation of fear against Europe, the biggest Ukraine's ally in Russia's war
According to the Ukrainian president, the drone attacks were "psychological intimidation, without a doubt." They scared some European leaders from sending air defense systems to Ukraine.
His words echo German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's statements that Putin is fighting not only against Ukraine, but he is attacking all of Europe. He said the Russian president unleashed a hybrid war against Germany and is trying to undermine Europe's political order.
“I think he scared them, that was his goal, and he achieved it,” Zelenskyy said.
Russia wants to drive the Ukrainians from their homes by winter terror
Meanwhile, Russia has moved from a strategy of conquering Ukraine to a strategy of its destruction. This year, Putin has lost hundreds of thousands of soldiers in exchange for less than 1% of Ukraine’s territory. This means Moscow is ready to pay any price for the occupation.
Russia is conducting thousands of air strikes on the power grid, central heating, and gas infrastructure as winter approaches.
The goal is to render parts of the country’s east uninhabitable, crash the industry, and provoke mass emigration and panic.
Romanian church challenges Moscow's religious foothold
Romania's Bessarabian Metropolis fired back at the priest expulsions, declaring that the "Moldovan Orthodox Church" name itself misleads believers. The Romanian church says the organization is simply "a local church structure of the Moscow Patriarchate" masquerading as Moldova's national church.
Before that, he Synod of the Orthodox Church of Moldova has stripped 11 more priests of their holy orders, after they transferred from the Archdiocese of Moldova to the Archdiocese of Bessarabia.
"The announced 'excommunications' have neither canonical nor legal force, since the mentioned priests together with their communities have not been under Moscow Patriarchate jurisdiction for many years," the Bessarabian Metropolis stated, calling the move an expression of "frustration at the return of more and more communities and priests to the Romanian Orthodox Church."
The Romanian church also accused some Moldovan church hierarchs of "direct and aggressive" interference in Moldova's electoral processes.
"After the direct and aggressive involvement of some hierarchs and clergy of the Moscow Patriarchate in the country's electoral and political processes—actions publicly condemned by civil society, the press, competent authorities, and also by the Bessarabian Metropolis—today's statement 'firmly condemns' the Church's involvement in politics," stated Besarabian Metropoly in Chișinău.
Despite the Moldovan church denying all accusations, this October, Moldovan police registered six cases of church representatives interfering in electoral campaigns on behalf of pro-Russian political parties.
Moscow-linked church denies Russian control
The Moldovan Orthodox Church called allegations from the Romanian church's Bessarabian Metropolis "unfriendly and dangerous."
Cathedral of the Nativity, Chișinău. Photo: Olga Hnatkova / NewsMaker
In a synod statement, church officials insisted they represent "all people living in the Republic of Moldova," regardless of nationality, and claimed to be "free and independent in its governance."
Drawing parallels to Ukraine, where the Russian-linked church faces a ban because of security concerns, the Moldovan church labeled Romania's accusations as an attempt at "division," pointing to "similar experience in a neighboring country"—an apparent reference to Ukraine—where attempts to restrict the Moscow-linked church led to "failures and deep social upheaval."
"The Republic of Moldova should not repeat others' mistakes, but the time has come to maintain balance and wisdom for the common good of our people," the church statement declared.
In fact, the church dispute in Moldova follows a pattern familiar from Ukraine, where the Moscow Patriarchate used religious institutions as tools of political influence for years. Ukraine's own Orthodox Church declared independence from Moscow in 2022, shortly after Russia's full-scale invasion, though the split remains contentious.
Ukrainian forces continue resisting Russian pressure in the heavily contested city of Pokrovsk in Donetsk Oblast, where close-quarters fighting is ongoing and logistics remain operational, according to Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Syrskyi. The general noted that reports that Russian forces have taken control of the city of Pokrovsk or have operationally encircled Ukrainian forces are false.
In recent months, the Pokrovsk direction has remained the epicenter of fighting in Donetsk Oblast. Russian forces have attempted to encircle Pokrovsk from the northeast and southwest, and have redeployed additional units to intensify their efforts. Pokrovsk is now in a pocket, surrounded from three directions — mirroring the situation in Bakhmut and several other cities where Ukrainian forces ultimately had to withdraw in previous years.
Syrskyi rejects claims of Russian control in Pokrovsk
Syrskyi stated on the morning of 13 November that Russian forces have not captured Pokrovsk and Ukrainian troops in the area are not surrounded. He emphasized that the stabilization of the Pokrovsk–Myrnohrad operation depends on coordinated actions between military leadership, combat units, and subunits carrying out assigned tasks.
To address the evolving situation, Syrskyi says he has visited the Pokrovsk direction, where he and local commanders evaluated the results of previously defined objectives and planned further operations. He stressed that the Pokrovsk axis remains the main focus of Russian offensive activity, with the highest number of daily enemy assaults recorded there. A significant portion of Russia’s forces in Ukraine is now concentrated on this front.
Syrskyi noted that Russian forces are attempting to use difficult weather conditions to their advantage. However, he underlined that Ukrainian troops continue to perform their tasks and prevent the enemy from moving freely or establishing positions.
Urban fighting and logistics under pressure, search-and-destroy missions ongoing near Pokrovsk
According to Syrskyi, Ukrainian troops are engaged in continuous combat with small Russian assault infantry groups both on the outskirts and within Pokrovsk’s urban areas. There are also occasional engagements involving the destruction of light Russian vehicles.
Ukraine’s key objectives in this sector, he said, include gradually regaining control of designated areas, maintaining and defending current logistics routes, and organizing additional supply lines. These efforts are aimed at ensuring the timely delivery of essential materials to frontline defenders and the uninterrupted evacuation of wounded personnel.
Fighting also continues in the nearby Ocheretyne direction. Syrskyi reported that over the past seven days, Ukrainian forces have cleared 7.4 km² of Russian sabotage and reconnaissance groups in the Pokrovsk district through search-and-strike operations.
"There is no question of Russian control over Pokrovsk or an operational encirclement of the Ukrainian Defense Forces grouping," Syrskyi said.
Meanwhile, the General Staff of Ukraine has released video footage showing Ukrainian forces targeting Russian troops and retaking previously lost positions in Pokrovsk. The footage from the 425th Separate Assault Regiment showed the use of tracked vehicles in logistics operations and the elimination of Russian soldiers during urban combat.
Ukraine's 425th Assault Regiment “Skelia” conducted offensive operations in Pokrovsk
"This is footage of our equipment entering the area... You can see additional assault units are moving into the eastern part of the city," said Ukraine's General Staff The General Staff pic.twitter.com/UxoAGSwT0e
Russian troops recently exploited poor weather conditions—specifically heavy fog—to penetrate parts of Pokrovsk. Separately, the Russians recently launched a mass assault on the city using light vehicles along the Selydove–Pokrovsk highway, achieving partial success.
Currently, the Institute for the Study of War assessed that Russian forces control around 46% of Pokrovsk and 10% of nearby Myrnohrad.
Today, there are interesting updates from the Pokrovsk direction.
Here, the battle for the town has slowly become a lethal war of shadows with almost no chance of survival. The Russian army is disintegrating under the weight of its own losses, and its push to capture Pokrovsk turns into a slow-motion collapse of morale and unit-level desertions.
For many Russian soldiers, the order to attack Pokrovsk has become synonymous with a death sentence.
Soldiers whisper among themselves that entering Pokrovsk means certain annihilation by Ukrainian artillery and drones, as videos from the area reveal the growing panic within the Russian ranks. In one, an agitated officer films two soldiers who refuse to go into the town, both saying they prefer prison over suicide missions. One claims a medical condition, the other shows a wound, but the officer is unmoved. He records them as proof to strip them of their pay, while threatening that they will be transferred to a penal unit and ultimately will be pushed into Pokrovsk at gunpoint anyway.
Such scenes are no longer rare, as the Russian army's losses in the sector are so extreme that many contract soldiers, who once enlisted for bonuses, now see imprisonment or even death in custody as preferable to the slaughter awaiting them on the front.
But these men will not be sent back to Russia to serve prison terms, as the Russian command sacrifices such penal battalions as cannon fodder and bait to reveal Ukrainian fire positions.
Drone-dominated battlefield spawns war of shadows
Inside Pokrovsk itself, the battle has evolved into a war of shadows, with the mass assaults of the first two years of the Russian invasion gone. Now, a dispersed conflict is fought by small, almost autonomous groups, with both sides having adapted to the drone-dominated battlefield that prevents large-scale movement.
The Russians use micro-units of infiltrators, two or three men slipping through rubble, hiding in basements, probing for Ukrainian strongpoints. The Ukrainians counter them with their own ghostly patrols, reconnaissance teams that move in pairs or trios, each guided by a drone in the sky with thermal vision, while the soldiers themselves carry portable electronic warfare devices.
These patrols are silent, highly mobile, and lethal, despite engagements that rarely involve more than a handful of soldiers on each side. One street, one courtyard, or one collapsed apartment block may become a self-contained battlefield for hours.
This war of shadows is a direct consequence of the omnipresence of surveillance and FPV drones, as any concentration of troops or vehicle movement is immediately detected and destroyed.
Main forces remain outside as small units fight street by street
The main forces of both sides now remain roughly ten kilometers outside the town limits, unable to advance through the open fields that have become killing grounds. Inside Pokrovsk, only the smallest, bravest, and most disciplined units can survive.
For the Russians, infiltration serves to maintain a symbolic push forward and to create the illusion of control, while for the Ukrainians, the mission is to contain, hunt, and eliminate these infiltrators before they can threaten logistics or weaken defensive cohesion.
The defenders operate with speed and precision: detect the enemy, fix them in place by surrounding and suppressing them, neutralizing the trapped soldiers with rifles, grenades, bombs, or drones, and withdraw before Russian drones can kill them in return.
Skill-based warfare becomes unsustainable meat grinder for Russia
This new model of urban warfare rewards skill, awareness, and endurance more than numbers. Yet for the Russians, whose units are filled with unwilling conscripts and penal soldiers, it has become an unsustainable meat grinder. Their desertions and refusal to fight are the logical outcome of a system that sends men to die for objectives already lost in the chaos of the grey zone.
Ukraine's strategic focus: Hold the railway line
Overall, despite the terrible nature of this fighting, Ukraine's army does not need to reclaim every block of Pokrovsk. What matters is keeping Russian territorial control south of the railway line, serving as a tactical barrier from the still-defended north.
While the Azov units push east of Rodynske to relieve pressure and reopen Myrnohrad's northern approach, Ukrainian defenders inside Pokrovsk only need to hold long enough to keep that corridor alive. If Myrnohrad's connection stays open, the town can continue to resist, or if necessary, conduct an organized withdrawal under cover of the northern fields.
In our regular frontline report, we pair up with the military blogger Reporting from Ukraine to keep you informed about what is happening on the battlefield in the Russo-Ukrainian war.
Russian war criminals can be held accountable. A Ukrainian court has found a Russian unit commander guilty of raping women during the occupation of the city of Makariv near Kyiv. Following a public prosecution by the Prosecutor General's Office, he has been sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Rape and any form of sexual violence are grave violations of the Geneva Conventions and are classified as war crimes.
The commander from Buryatia who brought terror to Kyiv Oblast received just punishment
On 7 March 2022, he and his brigade swept through the area, breaking into homes, looting, threatening, and killing civilians.
The commander, together with a subordinate, broke into a woman’s home, held her at gunpoint, and, under threat of execution, forced her into a neighboring house, where he physically assaulted and raped her.
The convicted man is a native of Makhachkala, who served as section commander and combat vehicle leader of the 9th Motorized Rifle Company, 37th Separate Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade (military unit 69647, Kyakhta, Buryatia, Russian Federation).
Makariv was occupied by Russian forces for several weeks but was liberated by the Armed Forces of Ukraine on 1 April 2022, during the counteroffensive. During the occupation, the town was about 40% destroyed, and 132 civilians were executed, as per Stratcom.
Russian troops destroyed many private and apartment buildings, and razed hospitals and kindergartens.
Since 2022, Ukraine has documented 190,000 Russian war crimes.
Russian forces are likely to collapse the Ukrainian pocket around Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad in Donetsk Oblast, but the impact depends on how Ukraine manages its withdrawal, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) reported on 12 November. ISW noted Russia had already denied Ukraine use of Pokrovsk as a logistics hub by July 2025. Meanwhile, Kremlin-linked milbloggers are prematurely declaring Pokrovsk’s fall, though ISW confirms Russian control over only 46% of the city.
This comes amid the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war, as Moscow is focused on seizing the rest of eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast.
Russian troops push into Pokrovsk as Ukraine maintains defense and logistics
ISW says Russian forces are advancing around Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad, supported by motorized assaults and glide bomb strikes. On 12 November, geolocated footage confirmed Russian progress in northern Pokrovsk. Moscow’s Ministry of Defense and milbloggers claimed the seizure of Sukhyi Yar and advances southwest of Rodynske, in eastern Novopidhorodne, and south of Molodetske — all near Pokrovsk.
Despite this, Ukrainian troops reportedly maintained or even regained positions in northern Pokrovsk and in the Zakhidnyi Microraion of central Myrnohrad. The Ukrainian 7th Rapid Reaction Corps reported Russia launched a multi-day assault on Pokrovsk using light vehicles along the M-30 highway. The unit confirmed Russia had established firing positions in several parts of Pokrovsk, but added that Ukrainian forces still controlled supply lines to the city.
Map: ISW.
A spokesperson for a Ukrainian drone battalion operating in Myrnohrad also said Ukrainian units continued receiving supplies there. Russian sources, meanwhile, acknowledged a Ukrainian counterattack near Rodynske, though they claimed the settlement remained in Russian hands.
Russian troops are also using glide bombs to strike Ukrainian ground lines of communication into Myrnohrad.
ISW questions significance of Russian advances
According to the Institute for the Study of War, the strategic impact of Russia’s possible seizure of Pokrovsk hinges on how Ukraine withdraws — whether in an orderly fashion or under pressure. The think tank said Russian control of Pokrovsk as a logistics hub was already effectively achieved in July 2025.
What happens next depends on whether Ukrainian troops can stabilize defenses after a potential collapse of the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad pocket and how effectively Russian forces exploit such a development.
Kremlin-linked sources exaggerate battlefield control
Russian milbloggers, many linked to the Kremlin, are mounting an aggressive information campaign claiming Pokrovsk is nearly or fully seized. One blogger said Russian troops gained "firm control" of the city by using heavy fog to advance, referencing footage of Russian soldiers entering Pokrovsk on motorcycles. Others declared that most of Myrnohrad is now a contested "gray zone."
Multiple milbloggers also circulated AI-generated videos allegedly showing mass Ukrainian surrenders in Myrnohrad. However, these were debunked by Ukraine’s General Staff and even by some Russian bloggers themselves. One milblogger even claimed Ukraine had shared the fake footage to discredit real videos from the front — while still insisting Russia held more ground than available evidence supports.
The Institute for the Study of War stated it had only confirmed Russian control over about 46% of Pokrovsk and 10% of Myrnohrad.
Canada has unveiled a new package of sanctions designed to strike at Russia’s energy revenues, military suppliers, and digital warfare infrastructure, according to the Canadian Government. The measures form part of a wider G7 strategy aimed at raising the economic cost of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, now approaching its fourth year.
This comes amid the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022. Since then, the G7 countries and the European Union have imposed multiple rounds of sanctions aimed at cutting Russia’s export revenues used to fund the war and blocking the transfer of military-use technologies. Russia, however, continues and escalates its military actions in Ukraine while constantly devising new sanctions evasion schemes, sourcing weapons and matériel from North Korea and Iran, and acquiring technology from China.
Canada adds new wave of sanctions against Russian vessels, drone developers, and cyber enablers
On 12 November 2025, Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand announced a sweeping expansion of sanctions under the Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations. The updated list targets 13 individuals and 11 entities, many of them directly involved in supplying or developing military and hybrid warfare tools used by Russia in its ongoing aggression against Ukraine.
For the first time, Canada imposed sanctions on Russian entities that support cyber infrastructure tied to Moscow’s hybrid operations. The government also sanctioned several developers and operators linked to Russia’s drone program.
In addition, the new sanctions hit several Russian liquified natural gas companies. Ottawa stated that energy revenue continues to play a major role in financing Russia’s war of aggression.
Another key component of the sanctions package is the inclusion of 100 Russian ships. Described as part of Moscow’s “shadow fleet,” these vessels have been used to transport "goods and property for the benefit of Russia" or Russian-linked persons. Canada previously sanctioned over 400 such vessels as part of earlier actions coordinated with its allies.
Minister Anand said Canada remains “unwavering in its commitment” to Ukraine’s sovereignty and will continue to apply pressure until Russia halts its invasion. The announcement aligns closely with sanctions introduced in October by the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom.
Measures part of long-term sanctions strategy
The Canadian Government described the move as a direct response to Ukraine’s current priorities on the battlefield and as reinforcement of the G7’s coordinated pressure campaign. The update also signals Ottawa’s continued alignment with G7 member states on sanctions policy and military support.
Since 2014, Canada has sanctioned more than 3,300 individuals and entities involved in violating Ukraine’s sovereignty, human rights abuses, or aiding Russia’s military operations.
UN traces Kherson's "human safari" up the chain of command — to Putin himself. Erik Møse, Chair of the UN Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, which has declared Russia's drone terror a crime against humanity, explains how investigators traced a direct chain of command—from drone operators on the Dnipro's left bank to the Kremlin itself.
Ukraine announced the return of a group of children and teenagers from Russian-occupied territories through the Bring Kids Back UA initiative, according to Presidential Office head Andriy Yermak.
The returns underscore the ongoing challenge of recovering Ukrainian children from Russia's systematic deportation campaign. Since February 2022, Russia has deported 19,546 Ukrainian children according to the Children of War portal, with only 1,791 returned as of 12 November 2025—a war crime for which the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants against Russian President Vladimir Putin and children's rights commissioner Maria Lvova-Belova in March 2023.
Children face harassment, forced assimilation under occupation
Among those returned was a 10-year-old girl whose classmates bullied her for her Ukrainian heritage, Yermak stated on Telegram. Her younger brothers at kindergarten were forced to sing Russian songs and collect money for the occupying army.
A 7-year-old girl and her 2-year-old brother lost their mother due to Russian doctors' inaction. Occupation authorities attempted to send the siblings to an orphanage despite having living relatives in Ukraine.
Another young person returned, now 19, had endured torture and execution threats from Russian military personnel because a relative served in Ukraine's Armed Forces. After reaching adulthood, occupation authorities placed him on the military registry.
Recent investigations reveal Russia systematically channels deported Ukrainian children through cadet schools and military training programs. The militarization campaign targets children as young as eight, subjecting them to years of pro-Russian indoctrination before conscripting them into occupation forces.
Russia weaponizes children as political leverage
The returns come as Russia uses deported Ukrainian children as bargaining chips with Washington, according to the Institute for the Study of War. Russian officials frame limited returns as goodwill gestures toward the United States while continuing mass deportations.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently highlighted the Bring Kids Back UA initiative as the primary channel for facilitating children's returns. An international coalition of 41 countries now works to support these efforts.
"We are fulfilling the president's task—to return all Ukrainian children," Yermak said on his Telegram, thanking Save Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine's Joint Center, and international partners.
Members of Ukraine’s EU-backed anti-corruption agency and the FBI are coordinating actions in the 2025 top energy investigation, which involves the alleged laundering of $100 million, ZN.UA reports, citing its own sources.
Recently, representatives from both agencies met in connection with the case of Energoatom, Ukraine's sole nuclear operator.
According to investigators, the perpetrators demanded kickbacks amounting to 10–15% of Energoatom contract values. Contractors had to pay to avoid blocked payments or the loss of supplier status. Timyr Mindich, one of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's closest associates, oversaw the operation of a so-called “laundromat”, where funds obtained through illegal means were laundered.
In the embezzlement case, five individuals have been detained, and seven alleged members of the criminal organization have already been formally charged. Among those searched were Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko, who has since resigned, and Mindich, who is hiding abroad.
FBI returns to Ukrainian investigations
A new FBI officer has recently arrived in Kyiv, and one of his first meetings was specifically focused on the Mindich case. The FBI representative works within the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine under an interagency memorandum originally signed during the bureau’s founding.
The case highlights Ukraine’s commitment, with strong European Union support, to eradicating corruption at the highest levels of government. However, the investigation must yield results and lead to the arrest of jail officials involved in the scheme. The case is especially painful to ordinary Ukrainians, who continue to endure up to 12-hour blackouts following Russian missile attacks.
For comparison, the stolen $100 million could have purchased27 Patriot missiles or 40,000 Sting interceptor drones.
After a brief technical pause that coincided with the US President Donald Trump administration, the document was re-signed following NABU Director Semen Kryvonos’s visit to the US. Since then, constant operational cooperation between NABU and the FBI has been restored for cases involving high-level corruption.
Germany maintains its confidence in Ukraine following a major corruption scandal in the country's energy sector, according to German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius in comments to DW
"The federal government will now very closely monitor developments," Kornelius said on 12 November. "We are in the closest confidential contact with the President [of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy and continue to be at his side, especially in such situations. Now we will observe the development in this particular case. And, if necessary, we may have to take measures in this matter as well."
The spokesman was responding to questions about whether the scandal would lead Germany to tighten control over how Ukraine uses aid.
"At this moment we have confidence in the government of Ukraine that it will take care of resolving this issue itself, as well as in anti-corruption bodies - that they will solve this case and bring it to a logical conclusion," Kornelius emphasized.
He added that corruption is not on the agenda for German-Ukrainian intergovernmental consultations scheduled later this year, and its discussion is not planned.
Finland previously reported that the corruption scandal in Ukraine's government would not negatively impact the European Union's plans to provide financial assistance to Kyiv.
The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) announced on 10 November an investigation into a large-scale corruption scheme at the National Nuclear Energy Generating Company "Energoatom," codenamed "Midas." Businessman Tymur Mindich, co-owner of Kvartal-95 and former partner of President Zelenskyy, was identified as the scheme's organizer. The prosecution stated that Mindich exerted influence on former Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko and former Defense Minister Rustem Umerov.
On the morning of 12 November, Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko announced that Halushchenko, now serving as Justice Minister, had been suspended following the NABU investigation.
Suspects in the case include a businessman described as the head of a criminal organization, a former advisor to Energy Minister Herman Halushchenko, the executive director for physical protection and security at Energoatom, and four individuals involved in the back office for money laundering. Former Deputy Prime Minister and ex-Minister of National Unity Oleksiy Chernyshov also received suspicion.
Two government members will be dismissed in the near future - Energy Minister Svitlana Hrynchuk and Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko.
Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha discussed the corruption scandal with international partners during a meeting in Canada with counterparts from France (Jean-Noël Barrot), Germany (Johann Wadephul), Italy (Antonio Tajani), and the EU (Kaja Kallas).
"I informed our partners about the situation on the battlefield, efforts to achieve peace and the fight against corruption. I confirmed that those involved in corruption schemes will be held accountable - this is the firm position of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and our government," Sybiha wrote on X following the talks.
Russian negotiators came to peace talks in Istanbul with detailed dossiers on every member of Ukraine's delegation and proposed creating WhatsApp groups to simulate progress rather than discuss substantive peace terms, according to Ukraine's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergiy Kyslytsya.
In an interview with The Times, Kyslytsya described three rounds of negotiations held on 16 May, 2 June, and 23 July in the Turkish city, where Russia's lead negotiator Vladimir Medinsky opened discussions with a lecture denying Ukraine's separate identity.
"He had the entire line-up of Ukrainian defence ministers, generals and diplomats, and still they deny your identity, your nationality," Kyslytsya said.
The Ukrainian delegation had anticipated this approach and agreed beforehand to avoid engaging with historical arguments, he explained.
"They know very well the background of every one of us and sometimes they do say provocative things and quite nasty," the diplomat told The Times. The tactic was designed to distract Ukrainian negotiators and create grounds to blame them for derailing talks.
Medinsky concluded his opening remarks by stating "we, the Russians are killing Russians," Kyslytsya recalled. The Ukrainian team let Russian negotiators speak as long as they wanted before attempting to move to their agenda.
Russian representatives repeatedly refused to discuss concrete proposals, instead offering to establish working groups and messaging channels that could create an illusion of diplomatic momentum, according to Kyslytsya.
"You have to put your arguments on the desk too, then the other side also puts their arguments on the desk. Then you try to figure out, where is the common ground? What is a grey zone? Where is the batch of the arguments that are totally unacceptable? We never reached that point," he said.
The only ceasefire proposal Russia's delegation would consider was a two-hour truce to collect bodies from battlefields. All other discussions of temporary cessations of hostilities were rejected.
Kyslytsya explained that Russian negotiators operated under rigid mandates from the Kremlin. "In a dictatorship, you can't have creative discussions with negotiation teams representing the dictator. They come with a very rigid mandate and they have to defend whatever positions they were given," he said. "So in the Russian system, you have to deal directly with the dictator."
The deputy foreign minister, who was appointed by President Zelenskyy to oversee Ukraine's peace process with Russia and Western allies, said talks aimed to deceive American officials into believing negotiations were progressing to avoid punitive measures.
Before the Trump administration imposed sanctions on Russian oil companies Rosneft and Lukoil on 22 October, Kyiv worked to demonstrate Russian deception to Washington. Kyslytsya said he had confronted Trump's negotiator Steve Witkoff about accepting Kremlin rhetoric at face value.
"I told him at one of the meetings, you know, Mr Witkoff, your problem is that you are too American. Americans, overall are very direct, they hear what you say and they say what you want heard. While the eastern European and Byzantine attitude is very ornate and very difficult, full of hints and references," Kyslytsya recounted. "Witkoff was really buying at face value what the Russians were telling him."
Kyslytsya was in the room when Trump met with Zelenskyy a week before the sanctions announcement and had lobbied Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on economic cooperation, including proposals to use Ukraine's underground gas storage network for American liquefied natural gas destined for Europe.
The Istanbul talks have since been abandoned. Kyslytsya said Ukraine's focus has shifted to pressuring international partners to force Putin into direct negotiations with Zelenskyy.
Ukraine has a drone edge, but fog can blunt that edge—by blinding the drones
Smart Russian commanders wait for foggy days to attack
Bad weather over Pokrovsk in recent days has allowed hundreds of Russians to advance
Ukraine has too few infantry to plug the drone gaps
The overcast and foggy weather that rolled in with the winter months is an opportunity for Russian forces to rush infantry and vehicles across the drone-patrolled no-man's-land and secure new positions in Pokrovsk, Myrnohrad, and other contested settlements.
That's because bad weather means poor visibility for drones—and drones are now the main means of defense for infantry-starved Ukrainian formations.
If the drones can see, the Russians struggle to advance. If the drones can't see, the Russians advance quickly—and in large numbers.
This was dramatically evident this weekend. "During recent days, the Russians have intensified efforts to penetrate Pokrovsk on light equipment through the southern suburbs," the Ukrainian 7th Rapid Response Corps, which defends Pokrovsk and neighboring Myrnohrad, explained on social media on Tuesday.
A map of Russian gains near Pokrovsk during 7-12 November 2025, by Euromaidan Press, based on Deepstatemap data
"For this, the enemy used adverse weather conditions, including thick fog," the corps added. "This reduces opportunities for our aerial reconnaissance."
How fog blinds Ukrainian drone defenses in Pokrovsk
Videos from Pokrovsk during the stretch of bad weather depict dozens of Russian troops motoring into the city on bikes and in compact cars and trucks. Yes, videos also depict some Ukrainian drone strikes on the intruding Russians—but too few and too slow to halt the Russian advance.
"There are currently more than 300 Russians in the city," the 7th Rapid Response Corps warned. "Their goal remains unchanged—to reach the northern borders of Pokrovsk with a further attempt to surround the agglomeration."
Explore further
First Russian truck enters Pokrovsk as fog blinds Ukrainian drones
The Russians were already creeping into Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad before the weekend fog, but much more slowly. Now with the advantageous weather, Russian forces have accelerated their advance dramatically—and the fragments of two Ukrainian brigades still in Myrnohrad face potential encirclement.
Russian commanders exploit weather to bypass drone surveillance
One Ukrainian drone operator has been warning for months—years even—that fog and other obscurants can blunt Ukraine's drone edge, assuming Russian commanders have the foresight to take advantage of the concealment.
"Need to say that Russian [paratroopers are] trying to use fog and a lot of smoke at the battlefield," drone operator Kriegsforscher reported a year ago. "And it really helps."
Four months later in March, the Russians continued to attack under the cover of smoke and fog in Kriegsforscher's sector. "I need to say that because of the smoke, it was hard for us to find them," the drone operator stated. "It's effective."
The fog that protected the Russians back in the spring is even thicker now. In late October, analyst Moklasen observed the Russian 336th Naval Infantry Brigade attacking toward the village of Dobropillia, just north of Pokrovsk.
336 naval infantry. late october, heavy fog - bikers clear the road of munitions for turtle mtlb assaults toward dobropillia, & bike casevac pic.twitter.com/eOTUuQHBMT
"Heavy fog," Moklasen observed. The concealment allowed Russian bike troops to sweep a road of Ukrainian munitions and clear a path for up-armored Russian vehicles to assault toward Dobropillia while the bikers fetched the wounded and sped them back toward Russian lines.
Dobropillia remains in Ukrainian hands despite the foggy Russian attacks, but the same can't be said of Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad. After a yearlong siege, the settlements are on the cusp of falling to the larger Russian force.
The loss underscores an important truism. Infantry can fight through fog in a way drones can't, but Ukraine has too few infantry to fill the aerial gaps when the drones can't fly or see.
"Drones and artillery help, but infantry still matters," Finnish analyst Joni Askola explained. "You need soldiers to hold ground. Ukraine does not have enough."
Explore further
Dobropillia diversion: did Russia trick Ukraine into losing Pokrovsk?
Why Ukrainian troops are vulnerable to foggy weather:
Ukrainian forces rely heavily on drones to compensate for infantry shortages
Fog and smoke render drone surveillance largely ineffective
Traditional infantry can operate effectively in low-visibility conditions
Ukraine lacks sufficient ground troops to hold defensive positions when drones fail
Russian forces exploit this gap during adverse weather conditions
Ukraine has become a drone superpower, producing about 4 million unmanned aerial vehicles of various types each year. For comparison, some estimates put US military drone production at roughly 100,000 units per year, Bloomberg reports.
Ukraine’s drone era began with Turkish Bayraktar TB2s. Ukraine purchased its first Bayraktar TB2 unmanned aerial vehicles in 2019. These drones have significantly strengthened the capabilities of Kyiv's forces since the beginning of Russia's full-scale war. Today, Ukraine produces most of its drones itself with the support of its allies.
Ukraine's drone variety exceeds NATO arsenals
Now, Ukrainian companies, facing acute funding shortages, are eager to share their drone expertise and create safer production lines aimed at European armies that want to stockpile weapons.
“It’s not just the quantity of drones, it’s the variety. Probably more than all NATO countries combined right now," said RAND analyst Michael Bohnert.
That variety includes long-range strike drones, as well as inexpensive first-person-view (FPV) attack drones.
Increasingly, Ukrainian air defenses are also using interceptor drones. Ukraine and the UK plan to begin joint production of such drones in the coming months to counter swarms of Russian drones.
FlyWell wants $50 million to manufacture drones on European soil
Some Ukrainian drone makers have already entered the EU market. For example, Skyeton opened a facility in Slovakia and has announced partnerships with Denmark and the UK. The company produces reconnaissance UAVs capable of flying for up to 24 hours.
Another Ukrainian firm, TSIR, is now operating in Finland and is preparing to launch a production line for tactical quadcopters that can cover up to 15 kilometers and are used for reconnaissance and strikes along the front line, in a joint venture with Finnish partner Summa Defence Plc.
FlyWell brings together several Ukrainian companies that produce aerial, ground, and maritime drones intended for reconnaissance and strikes on Russian targets from the front line to ranges of up to 2,000 kilometers. FlyWell plans to raise about $50 million to fund European manufacturing and R&D projects.
Currently, Summa Defence is self-funding production and has already created prototypes of three models that could enter mass production immediately after testing in Ukraine, CEO Yussi Holopainen said. Some of the output is intended for NATO countries, but Ukraine remains the priority.
Offices in Berlin and Copenhagen
Denmark allocated nearly $77 million this year to help Ukrainian arms manufacturers establish operations on its territory. The first project is expected to begin producing rocket fuel this year for Fire Point, a Ukrainian company developing the Flamingo cruise missile with a range of 3,000 kilometers.
Ukraine plans to open offices in Berlin and Copenhagen this year to market weapons, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on 3 November. This is about joint production and the export of weapons that Ukraine can afford to sell in order to raise funds for domestic production of scarce items that Kyiv currently lacks funding for.
The southern front, lacking forests and urban fortifications, remains one of the most challenging areas for Ukraine to defend. Therefore, Kyiv forces don't have options to hide somewhere to repel the rapidly advancing Russian attacks to the center of Zaporizhzhia Oblast, says military observer Denys Popovych, according to NV.
The region's center, the city of Zaporizhzhia, would give Russia a stronghold for an offensive toward Kryvyi Rih and Dnipro. Its capture would also be accompanied by war crimes and crisis, including population displacement and the suppression of cultural identity, as it has been in other occupied territories.
He explains that Russia is attempting to recreate the same scenario in the Huliaipole area of Zaporizhzhia, as it was inPokrovsk and Myrnohrad in Donetsk Oblast.
Russian invaders are trying to encircle this city, which is important from a logistical point of view, to surround it from the north.
“If we look at the map, we can see that such pockets are forming there, and this threatens that the city could be encircled from the north and the scenario of the Pokrovsk–Myrnohrad agglomeration could be repeated,” Popovych says.
At the same time, he added that if the Defense Forces fail to stop Russia in this direction, the occupiers may first threaten Huliaipole, and then move closer to Zaporizhzhia, he adds.
According to the expert, the difficulties for Ukrainian defenders lie, in particular, in the fact that in the south of Ukraine, there are neither forests nor urban areas convenient for building defensive lines.
Kyiv forces withdraw to save personnel's lives
On 11 November, Vladyslav Voloshyn, Spokesperson for the Defense Forces of the South, stated that the situation in Zaporizhzhia has rapidly deteriorated, per RBC. The Ukrainian Armed Forces withdrew from positions near five settlements.
“In Zaporizhzhia, particularly in the Oleksandrivka and Huliaipole directions, intense fighting has been going on for several days. The Russians are using all types of available weapons to push the Armed Forces of Ukraine out of their positions,” said Voloshyn.
According to him, in the past few days, up to a hundred combat clashes have been recorded on the Zaporizhzhia front.
As a result, Ukrainian forces were forced to withdraw from positions near the settlements of Novouspenivske, Nove, Okhotnyche, Uspenivka, and Novomykolaivka in order to preserve the lives of personnel. There, the Russian assault fired more than 400 artillery shells daily, using about 2,000 munitions.
“Unfortunately, the numerical advantage of the Russians is making itself felt ... which could endanger Huliaipole,” the DeepStateemphasized.
According to the experts, Huliaipole had long remained impregnable to the Russians, who attempted to attack it from various directions, including the Marfopillia area. Now, there is a risk of opening a new route that could complicate the defense of this strategic point.
Ukraine's Soft Loan Program delivered UAH 5 billion ($119 million) to 80 defense industry enterprises during its first year of operation, the Ministry of Defence announced on 12 November. On top of that, the ministry approved an additional 16 loan applications worth nearly UAH 700 million ($17 million), while 52 applications totaling over UAH 4 billion ($95 million) remain under review.
This financing is significant because it addresses a fundamental challenge for Ukraine's defense transformation: manufacturers need capital to transition from prototype development to mass production to meet immediate frontline demands.
How the Soft Loan Program works
The program offers manufacturers two financing options:
Working capital loans: Up to UAH 100 million ($2.4 million) for three-year terms.
Investment project loans: Up to UAH 500 million ($11.9 million) for five-year terms.
Defense enterprises pay 5% interest while the state covers the remaining percentage. Companies can apply through five partner banks that meet security requirements. The Ministry of Defence implements the program alongside the Ministry of Finance, the Business Development Fund, and participating Ukrainian banks.
"Safeguarding the workforce of defense industry enterprises is a matter of national security. Many key production facilities continue to operate under extremely difficult conditions to ensure that the army receives modern weapons and equipment on time. We are enhancing the conditions to ensure their continuous operations," stressed Deputy Minister of Defence of Ukraine Anna Gvozdiar.
Bridging the gap from prototype to production
Loan recipients use funds for production modernization, equipment acquisition, manufacturing expansion, and serial production development. The structure reflects a broader pattern in Ukrainian defense financing: companies build battlefield-tested prototypes and secure military contracts, but then need capital to scale.
While Ukrainian defense manufacturers can produce $35 billion worth of equipment annually, the loan program addresses the gap between this technical capability and the actual production volume. Companies often demonstrate successful designs but lack the working capital to purchase components, hire workers, and expand facilities to meet demand.
The loan program complements direct government procurement. For instance, Ukraine's Defence Procurement Agency paid UAH 104.2 billion ($2.5 billion) to 76 drone manufacturers during 2024-2025, demonstrating how rapid scaling responds to battlefield requirements. Manufacturers need both contracts and capital—procurement orders create the demand, while these soft loans provide the financing to fulfill those orders at scale.
Ukraine is fighting enemies both abroad and within the system. Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, during meetings in Canada with his counterparts from France, Germany, and Italy, assured that all those involved in corruption schemes in Ukraine will be held accountable.
An investigation into the alleged embezzlement of $100 million from Energoatom, Ukraine's only company that operates all of the nuclear power plants, is underway. It has been revealed EU-backed anti-corruption agencies have uncovered a large-scale bribery and $100 million scheme involving four ministries. The case is especially painful to ordinary Ukrainians, who continue to endure up to 12-hour blackouts following Russian missile attacks.
The minister is visiting Canada to take part in the G7 foreign ministers’ meeting at the invitation of Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand.
The talks are expected to be dominated by Russia's escalating war in Ukraine, stalled US-led peace initiatives, and growing trade frictions within the alliance.
Ukraine is working on building the trust of its international allies
“Those involved in corruption schemes will be brought to justice,” he emphasized.
In a high-profile corruption case involving Energoatom, Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau and Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office have detained five individuals. In total, seven members of the criminal organization have been formally charged.
The special operation to document the group’s activities lasted over 15 months, beginning in the summer of 2024. During this period, investigators collected a substantial amount of data, including thousands of hours of audio recordings.
Reports indicate that the head of the scheme is businessman Timur Mindich, who is also a co-owner of the entertainment studio Kvartal 95 and an associate of the president.
Mindich reportedly fled abroad a day before the raids, in which millions of dollars in cash were seized. This has raised suspicions that he may have been forewarned about the operation.
“I reaffirmed that those responsible for corruption will be held accountable. This is the firm position of President Zelenskyy and our government,” Sybiha claimed.
On social media, Sybiha called the meeting with French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani, and the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs,Kaja Kallas, "productive."
Sybiha: winter defenses needed, Russian assets must be seized
He also noted that discussions covered the 20th EU sanctions package and efforts to use frozen Russian assets.
“We also focused on strengthening our air defense and energy resilience ahead of winter, including through the PURL and SAFE mechanisms,” the foreign minister added.
Sybiha thanked allies preparing new military and energy aid packages and invited his colleagues to visit Ukraine.
Rubio arrives in Niagara: talks on Ukraine and Gaza continue
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also arrived in the Niagara region of Canada to participate in the G7 foreign ministers meeting. He is expected to address questions from G7 partners regarding President Donald Trump’s initiatives to end the war in Ukraine, as well as the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire agreement.
The meeting comes shortly after efforts to organize a summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump were suspended last month, Reuters reports. Officials cited that Moscow’s refusal to cease hostilities in Ukraine overshadowed the planned negotiations.
An investigation into the alleged embezzlement of $100 million from Energoatom, Ukraine's only company that operates all of the nuclear power plants, is underway. On 12 November, a Ukrainian court ordered 60 days of pre-trial detention for Energoatom’s Executive Director for Security, Dmytro Basov, after EU-backed anti-corruption agencies uncovered a large-scale bribery and kickback scheme, UkrInform reports.
The case highlights Ukraine’s commitment, with strong European Union support, to eradicating corruption at the highest levels. However, the investigation must yield results and lead to the arrest of jail officials involved in the scheme. The case is especially painful to ordinary Ukrainians, who continue to endure up to 12-hour blackouts following Russian missile attacks.
For comparison, the stolen $100 million could have purchased27 Patriot missiles or 40,000 Sting interceptor drones, as per Business Insider.
The court set bail at $951,000 for Basov. If posted, he must:
appear upon summons by investigators,
surrender his international passports,
remain at his registered residence,
refrain from contact with witnesses in the case.
What was Basov's role in the scheme?
The investigation has implicated at least four ministers from Ukraine’s Cabinet of Ministers. Over 70 searches have been conducted across several regions.
According to NABU (National Anti-Corruption Bureau) and SAP (Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office), members of the criminal network demanded and receivedkickbacks of 10–15% from Energoatom contractors. During raids, officials seized over $4 million in cash, RBC reports.
Basov, codenamed “Tenor” in investigative materials, allegedly coordinated the shadow network, overseeing procurement and financial operations.
Elite property and Mercedes GLE 300D
Basov previously led a department in the Prosecutor General’s Office investigating organized crime and later worked at the State Property Fund before becoming Executive Director for Physical Protection and Security at Energoatom.
He was dismissed from the Prosecutor General’s Office in 2019 amid corruption scandals but was later reinstated through court proceedings, receiving $59,500 in compensation for “unlawful dismissal.”
After joining Energoatom, Basov’s family’s wealth grew rapidly. In 2024, Nataliia Basova, his wife, purchased a 70 m² apartment in the elite White Lines residential complex in Kyiv.
Journalistic investigations reveal that over the past few years, she has spent approximately $360,000 on luxury assets, including another apartment (127 m²) in the French Quarter complex, valued at no less than $140,000, and several vehicles, such as a Mercedes GLE 300D, a Range Rover, and a Mercedes GLC 220D.
Her declared income does not justify these expenditures. Shortly before the purchases, the couple officially divorced.
EU Response
The European Commission has declined to comment on the ongoing investigation but reaffirmed that fighting corruption remains one of the key prerequisites for Ukraine’s EU accession, Suspilne writes.
“Combating corruption requires sustained efforts to ensure strong institutional capacity and respect for the rule of law. The independence of anti-corruption bodies must be safeguarded — they are a cornerstone of Ukraine’s rule of law as a future EU member state,” the Commission’s press service stated.
The EU has urged Ukraine to consolidate its progress in major corruption cases, particularly in asset seizure and confiscation, and to prioritize those with the highest public impact.
“We will continue to closely monitor the rule of law situation and stand ready to provide support,” the statement added.
Ukraine remains heavily dependent on EU support as it continues to resist Russia’s war. Ukrainian citizens endure immense hardships but remain steadfast in their commitment to defending their sovereignty.
Meanwhile, Moscow seeks to exploit such scandals for propaganda purposes, attempting to spread narratives suggesting that Western nations should reduce their aid to Kyiv.
Ukrainian forces hit the Starobesheve thermal power station in Russian-occupied Donetsk Oblast late on 11 November, triggering a large explosion and subsequent fire that disrupted electricity supply across occupied territories from Donetsk to Mariupol.
The strike extends Ukraine's systematic energy warfare campaign into territories Russia has occupied since 2014. Ukrainian forces have conducted retaliatory strikes on Russian power infrastructure since October, after Moscow's winter terror campaign destroyed over half of Ukraine's pre-war generating capacity in early 2025. The Starobesheve attack shifts focus from Russian territory to energy supplies sustaining occupation administrations.
The Starobesheve thermal power plant, located in Novyi Svit settlement, has a reported electrical capacity of about 2,300 MW and serves as the primary source of power supply for the occupied territories, Militarnyi reported. Purported videos posted on social media appear to show a large explosion and subsequent fire emanating from the Starobesheve power plant, captured by local residents.
Petro Andriushchenko, head of the Center for the Study of Occupation, noted that the plant was damaged and out of order, which caused massive power outages in the occupied cities—from Donetsk to Mariupol. Residents say electricity in homes is intermittent, with some appliances malfunctioning, according to RBC-Ukraine.
The facility has been under Russian control since 2014. After Ukraine disconnected the occupied parts of Donbas from its national grid in 2017, the Starobesheve and Zuiivska thermal power plants remained the main electricity sources for the Russian-occupied territories, RBC-Ukraine reported.
Ukraine expands deep-strike energy campaign
The Starobesheve strike is part of Ukraine's broader campaign targeting Russian energy infrastructure:
Days before Starobesheve, Ukrainian forces launched a coordinated assault on fuel and drone infrastructure in Volgograd, Crimea, and Donetsk
Ukrainian forces conducted more than 160 precision strikes on oil refineries and energy facilities in 2025, reducing Russia's oil production by up to 90% and causing a fuel shortage of over 20%, according to Security Service of Ukraine chief Vasyl Malyuk
Ukrainian drones and missiles have hit power facilities deep inside Russia for several consecutive nights, demonstrating both reach and precision
The International Energy Agency estimates Ukrainian strikes cut Russia's refining output by 500,000 barrels per day, keeping processing rates low until at least mid-2026
President Zelenskyy warned that if Russia resumed its winter terror campaign on Ukrainian energy infrastructure, Ukraine would strike back in kind.
Kyiv strikes Russia’s military economy. On 12 November, Ukraine's General Staff reported that Kyiv troops targeted the infrastructure of Stavrolen LLC, a petrochemical enterprise, in Stavropol Krai, nearly 300 kilometers away from its border. The strike diminishes Russia’s ability to produce weapons used to kill Ukrainian civilians.
The Ukrainian operation was precise and technological, with no innocent casualties, in stark contrast to Russia’s attacks on hospitals, schools, and energy infrastructure. Since 2022, Kyiv has documented 190,000 war crimescommitted by the Russians.
Reducing the capacity of products for the needs of Russia's military-industrial complex
“The plant has a full cycle of hydrocarbon processing and produces polymers for manufacturing composite materials, body parts, seals, and insulation for various types of Russian military equipment. Among other things, it also produces components for UAVs,” the statement reads.
The Stavrolen LLC in Stavropol Krai, Russia. Image: Supernova
Multiple explosions and a large fire were recorded in the target area. The results of the strike are being clarified.
Ukraine neutralizes threats in Russian depots
Additionally, to reduce the Russian offensive potential, an ammunition depot was struck in the temporarily occupied settlement of Novyi Svit, Donetsk Oblast.
“A direct hit and explosions were recorded. The extent of the damage is being clarified,” the General Staff said.
Special Operations Forces drones hit the target
Ukraine's Special Operations Forces have also confirmed the strike.
“On the night of 12 November, Deep Strike units of the Special Operations Forces carried out a successful fire strike on the Stavrolen petrochemical plant in Budyonnovsk, Stavropol Krai, Russia," it reveals.
Several Ukrainian deep-strike drones reached their targets. Local residents confirmed the explosions on social media, while local authorities claimed the fire was caused by falling debris.
Foreign ministers from the Group of Seven (G7) nations convened in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Canada, on 11-12 November 2025, for tense discussions on global security.
The talks are dominated by Russia's escalating war in Ukraine, stalled US-led peace initiatives, and growing trade frictions within the alliance.
The gathering comes as the G7 confronts a dual challenge: maintaining a united front against Russian aggression while navigating sharp internal divisions over US trade policies and defense spending demands.
Divisions over Ukraine and US peace efforts
The summit opened amid clear divisions on how to handle the war in Ukraine. Most G7 members have adopted a tougher line on Russia than US President Donald Trump, who has prioritized his own peace proposals. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul stated before the meeting that Russia's "continuing war of aggression against Ukraine" challenges global freedom and security, requiring a united G7 front.
According to a report from Euronews, European allies are particularly concerned about uncertainty over US efforts to end the war, as well as a separate US-brokered ceasefire plan in Gaza that is reportedly faltering.
The German foreign minister emphasized that his country is providing an additional €40 million to help Ukraine endure another winter, specifically to counter Russia's "targeted terror attacks on the civilian gas and heat supply." This financial support directly translates into tangible resilience, helping Kyiv maintain civilian morale and infrastructure stability—a strategic goal to prevent Russia from breaking the country's spirit.
Trade tensions and defense spending
The talks were also marked by strained relations over US trade policy. As reported by The Associated Press, President Trump's imposition of tariffs on Canadian imports has created friction with the host nation. This economic pressure is coupled with Trump's demand that NATO partners, including all G7 members except Japan, spend 5% of their GDP on defense.
The AP noted that Canada and Italy are the furthest from this goal, though Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand stated Canada plans to reach the target by 2035. In a social media post, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio framed the US position, stating the focus is on "putting the safety and security of Americans FIRST."
Indo-Pacific and critical minerals
While Ukraine and trade dominated, the ministers also addressed long-term strategic challenges, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. Kyodo News reported that Japan's new Foreign Minister, Toshimitsu Motegi, planned to "bring an Indo-Pacific perspective into G7 discussions and advance concrete cooperation."
A central part of this strategy is a G7 initiative to establish alternative supply chains for critical minerals to diversify away from China’s market dominance. This effort is a direct attempt to bolster the G7's economic and defense security by mitigating reliance on geopolitical competitors, a crucial step in the world's current volatile geopolitical situation.
The Russian army is punishing military personnel who failed to meet recruitment targets for the occupation army. They have begun to send them directly to the front, according to Ukraine's Defense Intelligence.
Such an attitude toward soldiers is part of the same culture of devaluing human life that leads to war crimes against civilians in Ukraine.
The Russian regime is ready to destroy anyone, even its own citizens, to continue the war
In the Far Eastern regions of Russia, where the recruitment campaign has consistently failed, the Kremlin’s army command has introduced punishments for unsatisfactory replenishment figures of the occupation forces, says the agency.
Those responsible for recruiting soldiers, mostly sergeants and officers, are being transferred to assault units if they fail to meet the recruitment plans set by Moscow.
In particular, in the Republic of Sakha, seven heads of recruitment offices were sent to the front to motor-rifle regiments of the 5th, 35th, and 29th armies.
The average shortfall at the region’s recruitment points is about 40% of the norms established by Moscow.
Recruiters are being sent to the front in areas of responsibility where either the required number of male population to meet the set norms is absent, or it is impossible to carry out the recruitment campaign within the established timeframes.
“This indicates the Kremlin’s complete unawareness of the state of affairs in the controlled regions and the urgent need to replenish losses,” writes Ukraine's Defense Intelligence.
Russia punishes its citizens with death, but Ukraine fights so everyone can live
The agency adds that every Russian soldier who does not want to die in “meat assaults” has a chance to save his life. To do this, they need to apply to the special Telegram bot. Named "I Want to Live", it helps Russian soldiers to surrender to do so safely.
The project is implemented by the Coordinating Headquarters for Prisoner of War Affairs, in coordination with the Ukrainian Defense Intelligence.